Reddit Reddit reviews A History of Vector Analysis: The Evolution of the Idea of a Vectorial System (Dover Books on Mathematics)

We found 2 Reddit comments about A History of Vector Analysis: The Evolution of the Idea of a Vectorial System (Dover Books on Mathematics). Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Science & Math
Books
Mathematics
Vector Analysis Mathematics
Applied Mathematics
A History of Vector Analysis: The Evolution of the Idea of a Vectorial System (Dover Books on Mathematics)
Check price on Amazon

2 Reddit comments about A History of Vector Analysis: The Evolution of the Idea of a Vectorial System (Dover Books on Mathematics):

u/dolichoblond · 5 pointsr/math

same here. In the rush to get everyone ok with matrix arithmetic, I feel like most students never realized that the matrix was just a nifty way to do bookkeeping. And it's not a bad thing; it's a great tool to use and if you're on the STE side of STEM majors there might not be a lot of reason to go above it. But it does make for a wild transition when/if you ever go up a level in abstraction.

I, for example, had no idea at all. Then I was helping a friend with some programming and we stumbled onto quaternions for 6DoF modeling. Talk about a 180. I feel like I'm still re-wiring all of my algebraic understanding from that point backwards. This book was fun to read when I made that turn too.

u/nikofeyn · 2 pointsr/math

to me, the most interesting mathematical history books are those with a targeted goal, meaning they cover the historical aspect of a specific topic, time period, person or group of people, etc. these, at least in my opinion, provide the most insight, as some of the more general books, particular those written for the general public, are too overarching to get much out of. also, another suggestion is to find biographies of mathematicians or physicists. i personally do not find any math history prior to the 1500-1600s or so that interesting, so all of my suggestions are appropriately biased.

a few suggestions are: