Reddit Reddit reviews A Theory of Justice: Original Edition (Oxford Paperbacks 301 301)

We found 6 Reddit comments about A Theory of Justice: Original Edition (Oxford Paperbacks 301 301). Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Books
Law
Law Practice Reference
Law Practice
A Theory of Justice: Original Edition (Oxford Paperbacks 301 301)
Belknap Press
Check price on Amazon

6 Reddit comments about A Theory of Justice: Original Edition (Oxford Paperbacks 301 301):

u/DarthBarney · 6 pointsr/Denver

You've not been here long I take it. Andrew Romanoff was the youngest Speaker of the House in our history. He was term limited & he is well liked and respected.

Take some time to get to know him, he's more qualified for the position than everyone else combined. He earned a bachelor's degree from Yale University, took time off from Yale to work at the Southern Poverty Law Center, where he researched the Ku Klux Klan. He also worked at the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination and taught English in Nicaragua and Costa Rica. During his time in Nicaragua, his political philosophy was shaped by reading A Theory of Justice by liberal philosopher John Rawls.

Then he earned a Master's degree in public policy from John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. Prior to earning a law degree from the University of Denver Sturm College of Law, Romanoff worked for Democratic Congressman David Skaggs.

u/satanic_hamster · 3 pointsr/CapitalismVSocialism

> So, if black people choose to remain in the country, they have to abide by how they're treated? What about being poor, if they don't like the country they should move somewhere else?

Don't get what black people have to do with anything. If you want to import irrelevant context to imply something I never said, you're welcome to do it, but you're arguing in bad faith at that point.

The basic point is that to the extent that you and I are citizens (I'll take it to be for the sake of argument you live in the US as do I) of this country, we consent (insofar as we continue to accept and be okay with things, despite whatever reservations we have) to one degree or another to the way things currently are, and we have a say and a share in a wide variety of things, as members:

  • We get to participate in the economy.
  • We are afforded certain protections under the law.
  • We get to benefit from communal and public enterprises.

    And which also includes our right to challenge the status quo (as has been done many times in our history). And you can go down the line as far as you want to, part of which I illustrated to another person a while ago.

    > The social contract is the equivalent of saying it's okay for you to beat your wife because she hasn't left you yet.

    Contractarianism is a highly sophisticated and nuanced moral philosophy. One that I adhere to with respect to certain tenets. And you hardly do it justice with one sentence that sweeps it under the rug. If you have any actual interest however, I'd start with John Rawls. You know as well as I do that statement is pure nonsense.
u/Tangurena · 2 pointsr/AskReddit

Utilitarianism says that the best action is one that increases the overall good. Rioting reduces "good" for lots of people (especially those who have their stuff destroyed or stolen) by reducing the overall "good" in society.

Some basic reading:
Utilitarianism and Other Essays.
On Liberty and Other Essays.
A Theory of Justice.

Utilitarianism is one of the major philosophies behind human/animal rights and abolition (of slavery). John Stuart Mill's writings have had a large impact on various political philosphies as well as science.

u/jackatman · 2 pointsr/askphilosophy

I'm found John Rawls' theory to be quite persuasive.

The essential bit is how would you structure society if you didn't know where in society you will be born into. The analogy I remember is making rules for a card game before you know the hand you will be dealt. It gets a little trickier when you ask what the point of the game is. One clear winner? No clear loser? Even distribution of points no matter what? The chance for even a shitty hand to win?

For the lazy.

u/perfect_edge13 · 1 pointr/books
u/[deleted] · 1 pointr/AskReddit

I think that we need to band together, start a fund to buy and distribute thousands of copies of John Rawls' Theory of Justice

I think a little bit of informed dissent will go a lot further than this drum-beating BS.