Reddit reviews After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90's
We found 3 Reddit comments about After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90's. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
The book appears real, with a listing on Amazon showing a publishing date of 1989. However, its importance seems highly exaggerated. The book only has 25 reviews on the website, and the majority of those are from just within the last few years, by conservatives complaining about it, and the book doesn't have an entry on Wikipedia. Again, not a definitive indication, but a pretty good one.
Want to see something scarier? This is something that has been happening for awhile, but most aren't even aware of it, and it's literal propaganda more or less.
https://www.amazon.com/After-Ball-America-Conquer-Hatred/dp/0385239068/ref=sr_1_6?keywords=After+the+Ball&qid=1551050012&s=gateway&sr=8-6
>Bible-believing
Demonstrate it.
> At that point it's a much more nuanced debate that requires a careful look at the whole of scripture,
It's so obvious just reading Leviticus 20:13, Romans 1, the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, etc. that homosexuality is a wicked sin in of itself. Cultural peer pressure to accept homosexuality is purely the result of what can be accurately called a psyop. Almost none of what the LGBT crowd proposes is based on logical propositions derived from fundamental principles of truth. Rather, it's based on emotional manipulation (think how the word bigot is used), collective shame (think what happened with Chick-Fil-A and the author, Orson Scott Card), and repetitive propaganda dissemination techniques (homosexual characters in sitcoms, now children cartoons, to the point where "it's not a huge deal).
Think, a few decades ago, homosexuals weren't as ostracized as previously, but it wasn't culturally condemned to hate or revile them. At this time, people who can be described as propagandists and agitators wrote about using effective propaganda techniques in order to switch the moral paradigm. Why is it that you can look back on the past today, and think of how "backwards" people of the past were? It has nothing to do with us being "better," it's because the paradigm of morality and tradition was different. Because moral paradigms are never intrinsically true or universal, even if they're hypothetically based on true and universal morals.