Reddit reviews America's Secret War: Inside the Hidden Worldwide Struggle Between America and Its Enemies
We found 3 Reddit comments about America's Secret War: Inside the Hidden Worldwide Struggle Between America and Its Enemies. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
A bit farther back in history, during the Cold War, the United States employed Russian tactics of using guerrilla factional disputes to their advantage by training and arming said factions. The primary principle was to create a buffer zone for weak war fronts.
The US used this strategy (to EXCELLENT effect) against Russia throughout the Cold War arming extremist muslim guerilla factions...most notably to Afghanistan when the USSR invaded in an attempt to "break the line" so-to-speak. The Afghani guerillas maintained a strong defense and managed to contain the USSR and it's communist agenda within it's borders.
Once the conflict was over, the US basically just packed up and went home, leaving a miserable amount of discontent, war-ridden guerrilla fighters in their poor, desperate desert country to fend for themselves...many of whom were exiled for their extremist views. This left quite a bitter taste in the newly trained and armed, however scattered, populous of Afghanistan. The threads of Al Qaeda slowly starting to weave together from this point on.
Edit: America's Secret War by George Friedman, founder and CEO of STRATFOR, can do a much better job delving into the specifics if you're interested. It's a fantastic read by a man with a wonderful and unique perspective on the geopolitical game of chess America has been playing for the past half-century.
Actually, the historical links between AQ and Iraq were only a small part of the justification. More important was any possible future connections Iraq and AQ, something the administration was not willing to take a risk on given the events on 9/11, and some very, very big WMD scares that occurred in the immediate aftermath, including the threat of a rouge soviet suitcase nuke loose in NYC, that was brought to our attention by 3 independent intelligence sources shortly following 9/11 (see below).
The Iraq Resolution cited many factors as justifying the use of military force against Iraq:
We invaded Iraq for multiple reasons:
However, attacking and occupying Iraq achieves three things:
It takes out of the picture a potential ally for al Qaeda, one with sufficient resources to multiply the militant group’s threat. Whether Iraq has been an ally in the past is immaterial – it is the future that counts.
It places U.S. forces in the strategic heart of the Middle East, capable of striking al Qaeda forces whenever U.S. intelligence identifies them.
And possibly most important - a decisive win in Iraq would change the perception of America, which had taken a SERIOUS hit after Black Hawk Down, and Americas resulting retreat under Clinton from the Muslim world, and the perception the America was vulnerable/weak after 9/11.
America need to prove to the Muslim world that it would not take an attack on American soil lightly, and anyone who dared tried ever again would reap the same fate as Iraq.
In early September 2002, Stratfor published a war plan series in which we laid out four possible U.S. strategies for invading Iraq. The war aims listed at that time consisted of:
>Replacing Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein’s regime with one compatible with U.S. interests. Maintaining the territorial integrity of Iraq so that it remains a counterweight to Iran, and so that nationalist ambitions by ethnic Kurds in northern Iraq do not disrupt U.S.-Turkish relations. Eliminating the threat of weapons of mass destruction by having total direct access to all of Iraq. Changing the perception of American effectiveness in the Islamic world. Destroying collaboration between Iraq and al Qaeda. Minimizing U.S. casualties.
https://fabiusmaximus.com/2008/03/04/stratfor-iraq-goals/
>Friedman's book explores the Byzantine details of American and Islamist Realpolitik in a fairly balanced way. He argues that the invasion of Iraq was not completely about WMDs or connections to Al Qaeda or even about oil, but was intended to show the Islamic world (and particularly Saudi Arabia and Pakistan) that the United States meant business and that those who didn't get with the program were going to be dealt with very harshly. The fact that the United States has substantial ground and air forces within easy striking distance of Syria, Iran and Saudi Arabia, among others, has no doubt been noticed by the leaders of those countries, dampening their enthusiasm for tolerating Al Qaeda.
http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/bombshell-new-york-times-reports-wmds-found-iraq/
https://theintercept.com/2015/04/10/twelve-years-later-u-s-media-still-cant-get-iraqi-wmd-story-right/
Suitcase nuclear bomb - https://www.amazon.com/Americas-Secret-War-Worldwide-Struggle/dp/0767917855
https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2002_10/iraqspecialoct02
WMD was a key selling point for the Iraq war, but it wasn't the wars only reason.
Fred Burton was a founding member of the United States' Diplomatic Security Service. He was the DSS's specialist in Middle Eastern affairs, over time he came to be the head of the Counter Terrorism division as well as the vice director of the DSS. His office predicted an Al Qaeda strike against the US but decide the threat wasnt valid enough. He was involved in the arrest Ramzi Yousef and brought up warrants for Imad Mugniyah. He wrote the book Ghost, which is very fun to read.
Edit: For must Reads:The Encyclopedia of the CIA, America's Secret War, and Spies Among Us. Also the aforementioned Ghost and Chasing Shadows