Reddit Reddit reviews Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects

We found 16 Reddit comments about Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

History
Books
American History
United States History
Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects
Check price on Amazon

16 Reddit comments about Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects:

u/ShellOilNigeria · 38 pointsr/worldnews

There is actually a fairly good but hard-to-follow book that was written about who might have been "driving the ship" within the U.S. government.

It's called Another Nineteen.

https://www.amazon.com/Another-Nineteen-Investigating-Legitimate-Suspects/dp/1489507833

u/rockytimber · 29 pointsr/worldnews

And Lee Harvey Oswald had ties to the US Emabassy in Moscow.

People need to realize that 9/11 was years in the planning, starting during the Bill Clinton administrations.

What did Zelikow's cover up have to say about the dancing Israelis?

About Dick Cheney getting a count down report on a jet approaching Washington DC?

About Larry Silverstein's financial arrangements for the WTC complex and who managed security there (hint: Marvin Bush was tied into it).

Pick any one of Kevin Ryan's writings, for example https://www.amazon.com/Another-Nineteen-Investigating-Legitimate-Suspects/dp/1489507833

rather than be played for by these tantalizing bits of excrement from the official cover up

Or read about Atta and his gang hanging out in Florida https://www.google.com/search?q=Atta+and+his+gang+hanging+out+in+Florida&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

u/Greg_Roberts_0985 · 6 pointsr/911truth

> Chris Bollyn and Kevin Ryan

These two people have vastly different opinions on 9/11.

Chris Bollyn is a hack, a disinformation specialist who masquerades as an investigative journalist and isn't a credible source of information on anything pertaining to 9/11, he is on the same level as Judy Woods and her dustification and Dimitri Khalezov with his nuclear bombs nonsense.


Kevin Ryan on the other hand is a well respected, prominent 9/11 researcher who uses a scientific evidence based approach on the subject and not a speculative, fantasy based approach like the three that are mentioned above.

He also does not believe Israeli did 9/11 like you implied, his excellent book, Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects is evidence of that fact.

u/Acanthas · 4 pointsr/911truth

Kevin Ryan might have some answers: Demolition Access to the WTC Towers: Part Four - Cleanup by Kevin Ryan February 11, 2010 http://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p4.html

His book "Another 19"- http://www.amazon.com/Another-Nineteen-Investigating-Legitimate-Suspects/dp/1489507833

Interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-yMe2Nla5M

u/Necronomiconomics · 3 pointsr/conspiracy

Possibly because United 93 was, for whatever reason, unable to make its pre-scheduled stop at WTC7.

There are numerous reports that people in WTC7 were told to evacuate because "another plane was incoming".

If it was wired for collapse (like the other two towers may have been), it had to be destroyed. When United 93 didn't arrive, they may have risked being exposed due to the evidence of the explosives remaining in the building. (As well as all the other paperwork stored there to be destroyed). Also, if WTC7 was a staging area for coordinating some aspect of the attacks, that would be incriminating as well.

Kevin Ryan's new book details the officials (& others including JSOC & Navy explosives experts) who were in WTC7 that morning, the ones who fled, and the ones who never showed up but were supposed to be there.

u/NAM007 · 3 pointsr/911truth

> Paul Bremer

I think Kevin Ryan did some excellent research regarding Paul Bremer, in his book "Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects"

Here's a video which I think covers that at least in part

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pogjpH20va8

u/rawrock5 · 2 pointsr/conspiracy

I haven't read it personally but this book might cover it:

http://amzn.com/1489507833

u/toekneemontana · 1 pointr/911truth

Not a message board, but a blog by scientist/engineer Kevin Ryan who also wrote the thoroughly investigated book "Another 19" called Digwithin

u/PortOfDenver · 1 pointr/conspiracy

Daniel Hopsicker says "These guys, their bench doesn't go very deep."

Each of the 9/11 commissioners are tied to major conspiracies from recent U.S. history.

Example:

Richard Ben-Veniste was Barry Seal's lawyer. This arrangement was set-up by George H.W. Bush. Ben-Veniste arranged to have Barry Seal transferred to a halfway-house, where Seal was then assassinated.

Seal, the famous CIA cocaine trafficker, was trained as a pilot by David Ferrie (played by Joe Pesci in Oliver Stone's JFK) and was friends with Oswald through Ferrie.

After Ben-Veniste got Seal killed, Poppy Bush's son made him a "statesman" who deserved to be on the 9/11 Commission.

http://spitfirelist.com/for-the-record/ftr-503-the-death-of-barry-seal/

Both David Ray Griffin & Kevin Ryan dismantle Zelikow as well.

If you haven't read Kevin Ryan's Another Nineteen or heard the 5-hours of interviews, many of the 9/11 suspects were on "terrorism commissions" that "predicted 9/11" years before, including Michael Canavan.

Many of the terrorism commissions studied things like hijackings and the effects of terrorism on mass psychology, and all of the people involved wound up in some way connected to 9/11, in key positions on the day of 9/11 or on the 9/11 Commission.

It's a small world, after all.

u/spays_marine · 1 pointr/Documentaries

>I agree conspiracies are real but that does not mean everything is a conspiracy.

Nobody made that claim. But 9/11 very clearly is.

>You look at years worth of investigations by experts that present perfectly plausible explications for the events and just dismiss it because "they're in on it".

That sentence doesn't even make sense. YOU were the one uttering the line "they were in on it". It's ridiculous to assume that anyone would reject what they say for merely making the assumption that they were part of the conspiracy. We reject what they say because it is bunk science that is not supported by the evidence they themselves provide. Let alone the evidence they tried to ignore, cover up, and ship off to China.

This is what real experts have concluded, not a handful of bought off crooks who lie through their teeth.

So no, they do not present perfectly plausible explanations for the events, their explanations are completely preposterous in fact, in the case of WTC7, the explanation breaks the laws of physics.

>The federal government planned and executed the most complex conspiracy ever

This just goes to show how little you really know and how much of what you believe is the result of silly things you hear on the internet. Of course "the federal government" didn't orchestrate 9/11.

Here's a book that might interest you. https://www.amazon.com/Another-Nineteen-Investigating-Legitimate-Suspects/dp/1489507833

> in 17 years not one shred of hard evidence has been shown

Coming from someone who claims the official story has a perfectly plausible explanation this is meaningless. I think that you, just like most people who defend the official story, do so because you like the story, it makes sense to you. And the evidence is really irrelevant. If evidence was important to you, then why on earth would you be defending something for which there is no evidence? They can hardly prove any of the hijackers were on board the planes, and at least 7 of them turned up alive after the facts.

"We have no hard evidence linking Bin Laden to 9/11" - FBI

Bin Laden denied responsibility on three separate occasions, and his confession tape was found to be deliberately mistranslated in exactly those spots that were supposed to incriminate him, according to an investigation by German national TV "Das Erste".

Entire books have been written about the issues, have you bothered reading any of them?

>19 guys with box cutters hijacked 4 planes and crashed them into buildings

Of course, if all you did for the past 17 years is mock alternative stories without bothering to look what it actually is that you defend, then yea sure, I'm sure that terrorist story is really comfortable. But that's nothing but an argument from ignorance. There are so many impossibilities you need to believe before the official story is able to stand that anyone who defends it obviously has not taken the time to look into what it entails.

u/moodmomentum · 1 pointr/conspiracy

>I was talking about "The New Pearl Harbor", are they part of the same conspiracy?

"The New Pearl Harbor" was written by PNAC. They are the origin of the phrase.

>I'm going to try to find everyone involed in the set up of 9-11 and research them and see what role each person played, same thing with organisations, and government administrations, etc.

You're biting off more than you can chew. There are dozens of books about this. Your paper would be thousands of pages long.

This book names 19 people "involved in the set-up of 9/11".

If you don't read that book, here are 5 hours of interviews with the author which discuss the 19 suspected individuals:

http://www.kpfa.org/archive/show/34/2013/08

http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/95210

You should skip the first hour -- start with any other hour -- then end with the first hour, which is background information.

If you don't buy the book, the author has many articles on the Internet and his website that contain chapters from the book.

If I were you, I'd skip trying to explain the entirety of 9/11 for your project and work on a much smaller project, such as "Who were PNAC and what did they want". PNAC contains many of the probable 9/11 conspirators who were later in the Bush Administration and government. Looking to explain "everyone in 9/11" will take you years.

u/[deleted] · -1 pointsr/atheism

Every aspect has them. Depends where you want to look. Many consider WTC7 a smoking gun. A large body of work exists on the topic. I suggest you start with these:

http://www.amazon.com/Without-Precedent-Inside-Commission-Vintage/dp/0307276635/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377909626&sr=8-1&keywords=without+precedent

http://www.amazon.com/Classified-Woman-The-Sibel-Edmonds-Story/dp/0615602223/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377909584&sr=8-1&keywords=sibel+edmonds

http://www.amazon.com/11-Synthetic-Terror-Made-USA/dp/1615771115/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377909519&sr=8-1&keywords=9%2F11+synthetic+terror

http://www.amazon.com/The-Big-Bamboozle-War-Terror/dp/1468094580/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377909542&sr=8-1&keywords=big+bamboozle

http://www.amazon.com/Extreme-Prejudice-Terrifying-Story-Patriot/dp/1453642757/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1377909542&sr=8-3&keywords=big+bamboozle

http://www.amazon.com/Crossing-Rubicon-Decline-American-Empire/dp/0865715408/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377909612&sr=8-1&keywords=crossing+the+rubicon

http://www.amazon.com/Towers-Deception-The-Media-Cover-up/dp/0865715734/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377909660&sr=8-1&keywords=towers+of+deception

http://www.amazon.com/The-Commission-Report-Omissions-Distortions/dp/1566565847/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377909689&sr=8-1&keywords=omissions+and+distortions

http://www.amazon.com/Americas-Deadliest-Export-Democracy-Everything/dp/1780324456/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377909754&sr=8-1&keywords=america%27s+deadliest+export

http://www.amazon.com/The-Terror-Conspiracy-Revisited-Happened/dp/1934708631/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377909786&sr=8-1&keywords=terror+conspiracy

http://www.amazon.com/Another-Nineteen-Investigating-Legitimate-Suspects/dp/1489507833/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377909803&sr=8-1&keywords=another+nineteen

http://www.amazon.com/The-Road-11-Wealth-America/dp/0520258711/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1377909829&sr=8-2&keywords=the+road+to+9%2F11

http://www.amazon.com/Black-11-Money-Motive-Technology/dp/1936296462/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377909848&sr=8-1&keywords=black+9%2F11

u/SellsDopeToKidz · -4 pointsr/Libertarian

> Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld. Rudy Guilani, Paul Bremer, Bernard Kerik, Richard Armitage, Colin Powell, Michael Canavan

FTFY

The list of 9/11 suspects and people who were supposed to be doing their job but were absent (those in the towers, Rumsfeld in the Pentagon, WH officials, all the big shots were missing that day), it's a loooong list

Another Nineteen is a book that shows just some of the potential persons of interests in what was obviously an inside job/cover up.