Reddit Reddit reviews Applications of No-Limit Hold em

We found 9 Reddit comments about Applications of No-Limit Hold em. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Humor & Entertainment
Books
Puzzles & Games
Applications of No-Limit Hold em
Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
Check price on Amazon

9 Reddit comments about Applications of No-Limit Hold em:

u/CoReCicero · 7 pointsr/math

Any poker math is kind of situational; you need to have a good understanding of poker in order for any of these sources to be interesting. That being said, I love poker and also maths, and reading that I've enjoyed have been:

GTO Range Builder Blog: http://blog.gtorangebuilder.com/

Applications of No Limit Hold 'Em: https://www.amazon.com/Applications-No-Limit-Hold-Matthew-Janda/dp/1880685558

If you're just trying to learn poker, there are some great youtube tutorials and The Grinder's Manual (https://www.amazon.com/Grinders-Manual-Complete-Course-Online-ebook/dp/B01GBFF890/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1482117534&sr=1-1&keywords=the+grinders+manual)
is an incredible introduction, although a bit pricy.

u/aeoncs · 3 pointsr/poker

https://www.amazon.com/Applications-No-Limit-Hold-Matthew-Janda/dp/1880685558

Pretty much the go to definitive source for what you’re asking.

Has a new book out as well, someone else may be able to comment on that one.

u/simism66 · 2 pointsr/askphilosophy

There are no axioms of poker in the sense in which there are axioms of a formal axiomatic system. Given your last comment, I took you to be speaking about such a system, and so, in the relevant sense of "axiom," there are no axioms of poker.

A formal axiomatic system consists in a set of axioms and a deductive system by which things can be proven, given that set of axioms. So, for instance, Peano Arithmetic consists in a set of axioms, formalized in the first-order language of arithmetic, and the deductive system of first-order predicate logic with identity. Mathematical theory can be formalized in this way. Poker theory cannot be, at least not at the moment.

If there is anything that could be called a "poker axiom" it's "Don't make a play that's negative EV." To make the play that has the greatest EV just is what it is to make the correct poker play. But there is no axiomatic theory that enables one to determine, for any situation and any play, the EV of that play in that situation. In the past few decades, poker theory has come a very long way (here's an example of a book that presents much of the contemporary theory), but the fact of the matter is that the game isn't solved yet. As such, there is no way in which poker theory could be presented as a formal axiomatic system.

(Also, I'd say that "Two pair beats one pair" is not an axiom of poker playing, but a fact that defines what the game is. Something like "Don't fold a low straight" assumes knowledge of what the game is (that a higher straight beats a lower straight), and is advice for playing.)

u/chopthis · 2 pointsr/poker

I would recommend these books:

u/[deleted] · 1 pointr/poker

I bought the ebook, you can also find it on Amazon.

u/RampLeViews · 1 pointr/poker

Applications of No-Limit Hold'em Matthew Janda was best poker book i've read. His newer one has slightly more info about solver work, but honestly still is slightly outdated just like every other poker book. It's not that all books have BAD info its just obviously not the most advanced concepts/approach to poker problems, which everyone is still learning and developing from solver work. This book laid out what it is to be "GTO" unlike any other book before tho

Amazon link

2+2 Bundle Deal

PDF Download 1

PDF download 2

More links