Reddit reviews Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Fixed Lens for Canon SLR Cameras
We found 24 Reddit comments about Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Fixed Lens for Canon SLR Cameras. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
100mm macro USM lens with f/2.8 maximum aperture for Canon SLR camerasFocal length: 100mm, Closest focusing distance : 1 foot (film plane to subject)Secondary diaphragm blocks stray light at f/2.8 for increased contrast, Ultra-sonic monitor provides outstanding autofocusing speed at all distances3-group floating system for exceptional close-up performance; full-time manual focusMeasures 3.1 inches in diameter and 4.7 inches long; weighs 21.1 ounces; 1-year warrantyOptional tripod collarLens not zoomable
It's pretty expensive: Canon 5d Mark ii with 100mm macro lens.
You are correct that the 55-250 isn't meant for macro - no lens is unless it's specifically advertised as one, like the Canon 100mm 2.8
A good start.
Macro is one of the most technical sides of photography, a good starter lens is the 100mm macro from canon http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00004XOM3?pc_redir=1410422622&robot_redir=1
If you want more magnification after that you can add extension tubes to the lens, but then is getting hard to manage the focus of the lens and the working distance can be awkward http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B000U8Y88M?pc_redir=1410295973&robot_redir=1
Finally if what you are really after is a microscope like magnification the 65mm macro from canon will do the trick, This is a highly specialised lens and I will not recommend it to a beginner. http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00009XVD5/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1410489652&sr=8-1&pi=SX200_QL40
That's what you're going to pay for a used one on eBay, so that sounds like a nice entry level kit there.
If you go Canon for the Macro, I'd recommend this one as a nice balance between price and performance.
1.) Something that is grey.
2.) Something reminiscent of rain. (It sprinkles all over you!)
3.) I've heard these are delicious
4.) For my best friend because birthdays! Also he loves superheroes!
5.) You must read this because I mean... V for Vendetta. The movie was fantastic, this will blow you away
6.) Well, it can be... ;)
7.) I am the crazy cat lady, so...
8.) I mean... It's beautiful
9.) Not the actual movie
But seriously, everyone needs to see this movie. It changed my life, really. I mean, it changes how you perceive things. Even your littlest actions. Not to mention, fantastic movie score... 10/10 would recommend.
10.) May not be real, but it still shoots...
11.) Definitely this or this but they're wicked expensive. The lens would absolutely change my photography career so much because photography is a lot more about equipment than people like to admit. The Macbook would help me with my photo editing, music mixing, and even my coding and programming. These things would open up so many possibilities for me...
12.) Ugh, stupid add-on... I just want to cure my chapped lips! :(
13.) This is the most expensive and I'd love it for photography... The MacBook, my second dream item, is only $100 less...
14.) Definitely bigger than a bread box...
15.) Earring are small.
16.) This smells glorious
17.) Because neurology <3
18.) This would be extremely helpful!
19.) I CAN'T STOP. I also may or may not have already finished the second volume...
20.) THIS COMIC OMFG but seriously, it is one of the best comics ever (according to statistics)
Thank you for the contest! :) <3
EDIT: Bonuses
fear cuts deeper than swords.... muahahahahaa!
There are three options I can think of for your use:
Look at prime lenses my friend.
Regarding your Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8: If you're shooting wider than 15mm make sure you take off the hood, otherwise you'll end up with some funky vignetting. :)
Have you compared that one to this one? I'm wondering how big of a difference that red stripe makes.
This is the one I have. I have read that it has the same optics, but just doesn't have the image stabilization that the L version has (I read that, but I can't promise it is true). For the macro shots I wanted to take, stabilization wasn't very important.
Skip the extension tubes especially on crop body and just get a real macro lens.
The non-L version of the 100mm f/2.8 can be had for $550 after rebate right now at Amazon - http://amzn.com/B00004XOM3?tag=amz-link-20 - and it's a great lens that nearly matches it's L-series counterpart in almost every way.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00004XOM3?pc_redir=1395934335&amp;robot_redir=1
>Macro is one of the most technical sides of photography, a good starter lens is the 100mm macro from canon http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00004XOM3?pc_redir=1410422622&amp;robot_redir=1
This lens, my god. This lens is one of the best purchases you'll ever make in the lens department. It's phenomenal for portraits, excellent for macro, and it's fast! It's nearly identical to the L version except without IS. Buy this lens, you'll keep it forever!
But also, Canon makes both a 50mm and a 60mm macro. You can look into those as they will be cheaper and more versatile for everyday photography.
I do have the 100mm 2.8L macro lens BUT if I could redo the purchase I wouldn't get the L series. It's a beautiful lens but it was just shy of a grand. I could have gotten the 100mm non L lens for half the price. I am a fan of the STM lenses and of course the USM lenses but I do shop with price considered now. The L isn't my first reason to look at a lens. Plus there are lots of lens rental websites so you can try before you buy or for using a lens once for vacation or something.
If you want to talk macro, PM me. I live macro photography. I'm no professional but I love seeing the details you miss all the time on small things. Super macro is also fun and quite challenging. http://digital-photography-school.com/super-macro-photography/
The prices have gone up a bit but still a decent price for what you get. I use my 100L fit family portraits too.
Non L is 600. Not cheap but not terribly expensive. It's an achievable goal if you really want it.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00004XOM3?cache=a0071f54bb81555881641ed403b15faf&amp;pi=SX200_QL40&amp;qid=1407817888&amp;sr=8-2#ref=mp_s_a_1_2
I have the 100 mm non L version by canon. Very very nice lens
100 mm
here is a review of the lens as well.
100 mm canon macro review
Just any macro lens?
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-100mm-Macro-Lens-Cameras/dp/B00004XOM3
But you probably want one compatible with your camera's mount and within your price range.
Thanks! I bought the camera to film chemistry reactions in macro :P, was using a friends Canon 6D before.
This lens - https://www.amazon.com/Canon-100mm-Macro-Fixed-Cameras/dp/B00004XOM3
With the Metabones Canon EF adapter for the new Lumix G40.
This is why a decent macro lens costs 600USD, without camera body. See https://www.amazon.com/Canon-100mm-Macro-Fixed-Cameras/dp/B00004XOM3.
This looks like a benign melanoctic nevus. You may want to visit a plastic surgeon. Remember, anything can be removed including your left eye. However, the most important question is the final cosmetic outcome: will it be better or worse than baseline? Can you live with the result?
There is a non 'L' version which is 'cheaper' and just as good optically. You can find them cheaper used (which is mine is too).
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-100mm-Macro-Lens-Cameras/dp/B00004XOM3/ref=pd_cp_p_0
This is a good lens to go with for that...
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-100mm-Macro-Lens-Cameras/dp/B00004XOM3/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1417540319&amp;sr=8-2&amp;keywords=100mm+macro
It's big brother in the L series is here for a little more:
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-100mm-Macro-Digital-Cameras/dp/B002NEGTSI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1417540319&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=100mm+macro
A Macro lens will say "Macro" on it and have a focusing distance of much closer. They're more expensive because of this.
You'd want something like this lens to do really close up shots like you're talking about.
I had a kit very similar to yours before Christmas. I had the T1i, and the same two lenses (assuming you meant EF-S, since I've never heard of EF lenses coming in those numbers). I found myself wanting to do more and more macro work, so I ended up with the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM. I haven't had much time to play with it yet, but the reviews on Amazon are spectacular. My only complaint is the lack of IS (which both of my other lenses have), but it certainly wasn't worth the extra $300 to get the next lens up.
Is that macro you listed on the left the same as this one?
Here are some links for the product in the above comment for different countries:
Amazon Smile Link: this one
|Country|Link|Charity Links|
|:-----------|:------------|:------------|
|USA|smile.amazon.com|EFF|
|UK|www.amazon.co.uk|Macmillan|
|Spain|www.amazon.es||
|France|www.amazon.fr||
|Germany|www.amazon.de||
|Canada|www.amazon.ca||
|Italy|www.amazon.it||
To help donate money to charity, please have a look at this thread.
This bot is currently in testing so let me know what you think by voting (or commenting). The thread for feature requests can be found here.