Reddit reviews Career Diplomacy: Life and Work in the US Foreign Service, Second Edition
We found 2 Reddit comments about Career Diplomacy: Life and Work in the US Foreign Service, Second Edition. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
Some General Advice Here:
Career Diplomacy
Inside a US Embassy
*Look into Fellowships
Thomas R. Pickering Foreign Affairs Fellowship
Charles B. Rangel International Affairs Program
Donald M. Payne International Development Fellowship
Payne is for the FS with USAID
I hope that helps!
>The last one had far less controversies than the current administration.
By what objective standard do you make that assertion?
> Russia collusion, pornstar relations, controversial statements regarding ethnicities, xenophobic groups, and other countries only start the laundry list of controversy surrounding the administratio
As opposed to destroying libya for no good reason, fast and furious, the affordable care act's many debacles, the IRS targeting conservative groups...... I could on on, but you get the point. just listing scandals tells you nothing unless you make a rigorous effort to actually compare and contrast.
>. Somewhat unprecedented amounts of high level officials have resigned from the administration within the first two years which leads others to believe that Trump may not have the most sound leadership and control in his own White House.
"which leads others to believe" talk about weasel wording. that's a vague, meaningless phrase. I could just as easily say that the Obama administration's refusal to replace people at senior cabinet posts despite their abject failure leads others to believe that obama isn't in charge of his own white house.
>contrasting economy and energy policies refer to Trumps stance on NAFTA and the Paris Climate Agreement.
>The US doesn't have ambassadors who ultimately make the calls for foreign policy missions and meet with the heads of countries regularly in these countries. Having no official ambassador is unprecedented and a real issue.
It is neither.
>The chief of mission is second to the ambassador. Any simple google search or history textbook can tell you that.
When there's an ambassador he is. When there isn't he's effectively the ambassador. I'm a published expert on the state department, lacking an ambassador changes nothing. but if you don't believe me, try actually reading about subject you're opining on
>China's clearly stepping up in the face of doubts regarding US leadership around the globe.
Yes. that's why, for example vietnam just refused to allow a US carrier to visit! Or why north korea just announced it was refusing to give up nuclear weapons! Or NATO countries are refusing to increase their military spending!
Oh, wait......