Reddit reviews Confessions of a Serial Alibi

So you expect Gov. Hogan to run Maryland's Twitter feed?

Do you really think the State of Maryland is wasting money on a PR campaign for a PCR proceeding? Maybe I'd agree with you if there was a pro-guilt podcast, or a celebrity taking up the banner for Hae's family, or even Hae's family taking an active part in the media surrounding the case. None of that is happening.

On the other hand, we have TV shows in which Adnan's defense team and advocates were interviewed, but the State's weren't (http://www.investigationdiscovery.com/tv-shows/adnan-syed-innocent-or-guilty/).

We have TV segments in which Adnan's defense team and advocates are interviewed (http://www.msnbc.com/shift/watch/the-docket-serial-special-part-ii-422338627656).

We have Adnan's alibi witness going on television shows (http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/twist-adnan-syed-serial-murder-trial-41610902).

We have two books discussing Adnan's innocence (https://www.amazon.com/Adnans-Story-Search-Justice-Serial/dp/1250087104 and https://www.amazon.com/Confessions-Serial-Alibi-McClain-Chapman/dp/1682611582/).

And I haven't even reiterated the things I mentioned earlier in this thread. Take a look at all that, and tell me which side appears to be using the media in this case.

She is a terrible witness because she is a publicity hound who has made a second career out of being the Adnan Alibi lady. I mean, just look at her book, it tells you all you need to know:

https://www.amazon.com/Confessions-Serial-Alibi-McClain-Chapman/dp/1682611582

>If you wait long enough for witnesses to die

Gutierrez and Davis.

>if you destroy enough evidence

Where is Davis' report on the Public Library?

> if you tamper with enough "witnesses,"

"HE WROTE A LETTER TO A GIRL TO
TYPE UP WITH HIS ADDRESS ON IT
BUT SHE GOT IT WRONG."

>if you become famous enough that "witnesses" can figure out a way to make a buck

https://www.amazon.com/Confessions-Serial-Alibi-McClain-Chapman/dp/1682611582

So actually everything I said was right.

Except not: "Confessions of a Serial Alibi" (http://www.amazon.com/Confessions-Serial-Alibi-McClain-Chapman/dp/1682611582/180-8424432-2962149?ie=UTF8&*Version*=1&*entries*=0). You do see the difference, don't you? The OP was being unfair, and tendentious, since Asia has never claimed to be "the alibi", just "an alibi" for a particular period of time. So it is not unusual that she would have no claim about whether Adnan was guilty or not, because her evidentiary knowledge is limited to what she experienced first hand..

It did. Became big news for a while

Also ruined her for any lawyer.