Reddit Reddit reviews Does the Center Hold?: An Introduction to Western Philosophy

We found 2 Reddit comments about Does the Center Hold?: An Introduction to Western Philosophy. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Books
Philosophy
Philosophy History & Survey
Politics & Social Sciences
Does the Center Hold?: An Introduction to Western Philosophy
Check price on Amazon

2 Reddit comments about Does the Center Hold?: An Introduction to Western Philosophy:

u/blue_roster_cult · 3 pointsr/askphilosophy

It wasn't a series, sorry if I gave that impression. I was referring to two separate books, although they may in fact be a part of a series:

Western Philosophy

And the one on Derrida which I wouldn't recommend to a 13 year old for obvious reasons. But a little web searching and you might find it's part of a series or something.

It's been well over a decade since I read either book, so you might take my recommendation with a grain of salt.

u/NicotineGumAddict · 2 pointsr/woahdude

he is saying both sort of. life has no meaning, but meaning isn't found within the struggle exactly, rather we exist in between the struggle and we create our own meaning. we are free, we have only to realize that the rules don't apply.

I can give you some advice for reading existentialism and also some places to start.

just curious, tho, how old are you?

there's several ways to approach reading philosophy.

method 1:
when reading philosophy of any kind you can get bogged down in the references and footnotes. when I was just starting out I would get so overwhelmed by things I didn't understand I would give up. don't give up. and don't worry about what you don't understand, just keep reading and see what you get out of it.

method 2:
BEFORE you read a book, read the Wikipedia page on it. back in the day I had to collect Coppleston's history of philosophy volumes to read commentary, but now it's online. so before you read, do some quick background reading so you know a) where the author is coming from/their general point of view/any important details about their life that pertain to understanding the book B) the author's main argument in the book - this will help you pick out his argument and understand it better.

3) some tips: a) read for pleasure. don't feel bad if you hate a book and just can't read it or make sense of it. sometimes later it makes more sense, but it's ok to hate a writer even if everyone else says they're amazing b) read with a pen or pencil in hand - underline things you like, write "I disagree" if you do, sometimes I even write "LOL" if it made me laugh and related to that B) take some notes as you go along whatever you think is important.. a sentence, a point, I use notes to restate in my own words the argument I just read... it helps me get it better and I have a reference in my own lingo that makes sense to me

where to start I would start with two books:

  1. Donald Palmer "does the center hold? an intro to western philosophy"
    Amazon price ~2$

    get this book if you get no others!

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0073535753/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?qid=1462783700&sr=8-2&pi=SY200_QL40&keywords=does+the+center+hold&dpPl=1&dpID=51hxbBbmgzL&ref=plSrch


    2.Walter Kaufmann "existentialism: from Dostoyevsky to Sartre"
    Amazon price 11$

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0452009308/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?qid=1462783302&sr=8-2&pi=SY200_QL40&keywords=walter+kaufmann&dpPl=1&dpID=41lkh1kWkeL&ref=plSrch

    after that, depends on what you want to learn, but after the above I would read "Notes from Underground" by Dostoyevsky

    then maybe: JD Salinger "Catcher in the Rye"

    this was how I learned... after those two I went back chronologically and read Plato(he's foundational and easy enough to grasp), Kierkegaard, Dostoyesky, Camus and Sartre, then I started skipping around once I had a foundation.

    with existentialism the important thing to remember is that it isn't an exact philosophy. it was at first a reaction against exact philosophies with prescriptive definitions to how we should live. existentialism, rather, is a shared angst (Wikipedia Kierkegaard Angst) about life, an anxiety in the face of the meaninglessness of life. life has no meaning. now what? if life has no meaning, then all the rules are arbitrary, and you are truly free. free to do and be whatever you want.

    good luck on your quest, it's a worthy one.

    and my last piece of advice is this: there's no hurry... if a book takes you a year to digest, that's fine! if another takes you a week, ok! another might require 2 months. don't rush, digest the argument and internalize it.

    and I'm around on Reddit all the time if you have questions. and don't let philosophy snobs tells you you have to blah blah blah... philosophy should be accessible to all, otherwise it's a stupid endeavor.

    again.. good luck.