Reddit Reddit reviews Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation

We found 7 Reddit comments about Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

History
Books
Historical Study
Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation
Check price on Amazon

7 Reddit comments about Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation:

u/easily_swayed · 7 pointsr/Anarchism

This + this + this = Socialism and worker autonomy cannot come quickly enough

u/DogBotherer · 3 pointsr/unitedkingdom

>Are the 2 not linked? Genuine question. I would have assumed there was a fair amount of correlation.

Related but distinct. The executive summary of this report helps to clarify.

>You got any links on this? I could do with some in my arsenal.

There are quite a lot of studies out there, it's a fairly consistent finding. There are some references here and some more here, and one of the more famous analyses is contained in books by David Noble such as Forces Of Production.

u/bicycleradical · 3 pointsr/history

There is an excellent book titled Forces of Production by David Noble which begins with the story of the Luddites and draws comparisons between their plight and what skilled machinists underwent in the government subsidized development of CNC technology.

http://www.amazon.com/Forces-Production-History-Industrial-Automation/dp/0195040465

u/[deleted] · 3 pointsr/socialism

You sound like you're not in the workforce yet, and still in college, yeah? If so, take the time to join with radical student organizations and local community groups, and try to find literature on the intersection between engineering and socialism. I've been doing the latter quite a lot, and there is quite a lot to think about in terms of reflecting on the role of the engineer in capitalism, the nature of techno-scientific work, etc.

Here are some books that I highly recommend, that are transforming the way I see myself as an engineer:

u/zawse · 0 pointsr/classic4chan

I know this is an old post, but it really saddens me how much people ignore the truth. There was a study done by David Noble that concluded that the vast majority of our advances in technology could not be done in the private sector. Did private industry put a man on the moon? They certainly want to take credit for it now. It would not be possible without the massive collective effort of the WHOLE WORLD.

You don't have to accept anything, faith is belief without evidence. I'll take evidence any day.

Also, if you had the choice between a government you could (theoretically) vote out if it was abusing you or one which could do whatever they wanted with impunity with no recourse for the citizen, which would you choose?

Maybe you never read about the labor struggles of the past; that only the government could tell private industry to not kill people or provide them basic wages and working conditions.
What do they say? Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it?

u/phoenix_insurgent · 0 pointsr/Anarcho_Capitalism

I actually think ancaps play this game with capitalism. The good things are the result of the market and capitalism, and the bad things are the result of statism and corporatism. But a closer look, like for instance that done by historians like David F. Noble and economists like Mariana Mazzucato shows that, in fact, the history of innovation -- especially technological innovation -- is basically the story of the state. Which lines up nicely with the history, which shows the state was crucial in creating the conditions (via coercion and mass murder) for capitalism to come to dominate society.