Reddit reviews Hooked on Phonics Reading Comprehension: 1st Grade

That's a nice straw man you've built there but if you'll notice I didn't say anything about the drugs themselves were inherently bad just the legal ramifications. Especially so for someone that wants to be LE or some other type of first responder.

I hear that Hooked On Phonics can help with reading comprehension since you seem to struggle with it.

Why did you respond to my comment if all you were going to do was accuse me of lying? It adds nothing to the discussion at hand (light reading vs heavy reading), and it just makes you look bad because you went out of your way to make a pointless comment. It also makes it look like you have nothing to support your original comment.

I do care, but you seem to be missing what I actually care about and why I responded to you in the first place. I've already told you why I care twice, so rather than repeating myself again, I'll just leave you this so you can come back and decipher my point for yourself at some point. Think of it as a goal for the future. Good luck!

https://www.amazon.com/Hooked-Phonics-Reading-Comprehension-Grade/dp/1933863943

No, the comments are on Vice. You failed to read the entire article,

>Politic365's content is distributed widely, and High has published a slew of anti-net neutrality op-eds at the Huffington Post.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kristal-high/modernizing-the-telecommunications_b_5257163.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kristal-high/broadband-progress-on-the_b_4364985.html

And misinterpreted the parts you did read...

> For a story about how civil rights groups with funding from Comcast and other telecom companies wrote a letter to the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) supporting the agency’s proposal to gut net neutrality, High showed up in the comment section to call me "paternalistic."

You might try something more your speed first: http://www.amazon.com/dp/1933863943

that sure isnt a quote of where I said "why are you saying this is going to affect your gaming experience"

ill be waiting

if you remove the non existent implication itll still say the same exact thing

i asked "why would it matter to you or anyone else if everyone got compensation"

and in the next sentence I put my two sense in, logically if I was trying to IMPLY you said that I would not separate the two sentences NOR would I ask you why it mattered if everyone got the compensation

here's the link for you; http://www.amazon.com/Hooked-Phonics-Reading-Comprehension-Grade/dp/1933863943

Thats a great bot. Also look at you taking what I said out of context, and missing the point I was attempting to make.

Once again here is the full quote:

>Since we are both making assumptions based off very little evidence, I will assume you are a virgin. See how that works?

The point behind this statement was not to call you a virgin (I dont care where you stick your dick or whatever genitalia you have). The point was to show that anyone can make baseless assumptions based on very little evidence. As an example, I called you a virgin. Why must you take everything I say out of context? Do you need this? That might help you out dude, I suggest you purchase it....