Reddit reviews Interpreting the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
We found 3 Reddit comments about Interpreting the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
Orders are despatched from our UK warehouse next working day.
Ummm... like I said, an actual university law professor who specializes in nonproliferation law and has written books like "Interpreting the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty" Oxford University Press; 1 edition (July 21, 2011) http://www.amazon.com/Interpreting-Nuclear-Non-Proliferation-Treaty-Daniel/dp/0199227357
You can believe whomever you want but like I said, the IAEA report itself does not say Iran had a nuclear weapons program; you're just taking some reporter's version
Yes problem because Wikipedia is in general not an authoritative source, and there really is no "varying opinion" on what constitutes a breach of the NPT. The matter is spelled out in minute detail in a legal document called the Safeguards Agreement, previously provided. Note that Acton says what "could" be true, but isn't. Even the Australian fella's claims are not based on the law but on his opinion of what "practical terms" supposedly mean.
The simple fact is that there is no diversion of nuclear material in Iran to non-peaceful uses according to the inspectors, thus Iran has not violated the NPT. Now, instead of relying on wikipedia, I suggest reading one of those things that has paper and covers...called a BOOK.
Interpreting the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty by Daniel Joyner
http://www.amazon.com/Interpreting-Nuclear-Non-Proliferation-Treaty-Daniel/dp/0199227357/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1333117053&sr=8-2
> I don't think there's a "right to enrich", you just do it, but under the non-proliferation treaty, you do kind of have to justify that the enriching you're doing is for non-weapon purposes
Please don't express legal opinions that are silly. First of all, the NPT is not a source of rights. Second, yuo don't have to "justify" anything inclding enrichment, and third, Iran not only allowed all the inspections it was required to allow, it went repeatedly well beyond them and furthermore even suspended enrichment as a good faith gesture for several years.
In fact, the NPT obligates the nuclear-armed coutries like the US to share nuclear technology with other signatories such as Iran, "to the fullest extent possible" and "without discrimination".
May I suggest reading up a bit first at least before expressing opinions on legal arms control matters
https://www.amazon.com/Interpreting-Nuclear-Non-Proliferation-Treaty-Daniel/dp/0199227357
And then
https://www.amazon.com/Irans-Nuclear-Program-International-Confrontation/dp/0190635711