Reddit reviews John Nunn's Chess Puzzle Book
We found 2 Reddit comments about John Nunn's Chess Puzzle Book. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
Gambit Publications
Reddit reviews John Nunn's Chess Puzzle BookWe found 2 Reddit comments about John Nunn's Chess Puzzle Book. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
Ok, cutting and pasting my own post from early in the year. (Sorry about the formatting.) I originally composed this for a friend who claimed he was ready to work on chess for 20 hours/week. I don't think he's kept it up.
-----------------------------------------------------
Here's what I recently emailed someone in the same situation as you - well, his goal was year-end.
If you STUDY chess for 15-20 hours/week for a year, you should be 2000 strength by the end of the year, and 2200 (I expect - much better than me) by the end of next year. Studying is the same as for math and music - it does not include leisure time like playing blitz.
You can break down your chess study into five buckets:
Tactics (start now and continue forever)
Endings (start in April and continue)
Playing/competing (start in February / start reading in July)
Strategy/middlegame planning (start in August and continue)
Openings (start in November and continue)
I think you need to begin them in that order - overlapping, of course.
[1] Tactics - do these books in order. DO the problems, however long it takes - don't look up an answer until you have a solid solution. If the books offer clues on the page (e.g. this page is all pins and skewers), go through and black them out with a marker in advance.
[2] Endings
[3] Playing/competing Play slow games, at time controls of Game/60 to Game/120, preferably against stronger players. Keep score, then analyze and annotate those games in depth, without using a computer. Then go over the games and your analysis with a stronger player, e.g. bring it to Sunday chess club.
I should really stress this - chess is about playing, not just studying. You need to find a variety of strong players, not just computers, and play against them. You might also consider playing correspondence.
If you play in tournaments during this time, DO NOT THINK ABOUT YOUR RATING. Also, NEVER offer or accept a draw, EVEN if the option is losing. During the next two years, your only goal is to learn and improve. Learning comes from playing on.
After a few months of playing and analyzing slow games, read these books:
By "read" I mean go through them slowly, doing every exercise, thinking about every comment to every game. It's hard work.
[4] Strategy/planning
[5] http://www.amazon.com/Build-Your-Chess-Opening-Repertoire/dp/1901983897 [How to Build Your Chess Opening Repertoire]
Of course someone else could construct an equally valid study plan with hundreds of entirely different books, but ... the ones I've chosen are excellent, and I strongly believe that they are sufficient.
I don't mention computers very much. I think they can be most useful as sparring partners for learning your basic endings and (eventually) openings. But don't let your study center around computers or opening databases or internet blitz.
And of course ... don't let it stop being fun. :-) Maybe that's where some blitz comes in. Otherwise, what's the point?
| How much better could some of these titans actually become?
One answer would be: no better than the technology and wisdom he was handed in the tablet.
In John Nunn's Chess Puzzle Book (expanded edition) is the chapter, "The Test of Time" (not to be confused with the same-titled book by Kasparov). The author's thesis - based on his studying of games - is that the world's best players of about a century ago would be about 2100 FIDE strength today.
I'd be most interested if the tablet were handed to Alekhine or Rubinstein, both obsessive perfectionists. Or Nimzowitsch, whose articulate writings were accessible and groundbreaking. Or the hypermodernists, Tartakower, Breyer and Reti, who had wild imaginations. Or God Himself: maybe He would've beaten Steinitz in their games.