Reddit reviews Logic For Dummies

Don't tell me I don't support a thing that I support so that you can criticize me for not supporting it, lmao.

You lot aren't too bright, eh? I guess it's easier to argue against us when you just make shit up on the spot. Here's a book for you, since you like reading so much.

>Basic. Ass. Film. Theory. Read a mutherfuckin book nigga. Movie's are >not just flat images.

Read lots of books. Maybe you should try one as well. How about http://www.amazon.com/Logic-For-Dummies-Mark-Zegarelli/dp/0471799416/ref=pd_sim_b_1

>What evidence do you have that it won't sink her campaign?

I never made that claim. I never made any statement of fact about the outcome of the campaign.

This is where you get yourself into trouble. You confuse facts and evidence and opinions.

You have made several subjective conclusions that are entirely based on opinion, and now you're confused and think they're statements of fact and therefore a certainty that requires an evidential rebuttal.

Here's a book that might help you.

https://www.amazon.com/Logic-Dummies-Mark-Zegarelli/dp/0471799416

And here you go! Since you failed to explain yourself, it is much needed, I suppose. Lets play this shitpost game together then. It seems that I won't have any kind of reasonable answer from you, so why not engage in some tomfoolery?

Oh! I have even better book for you:

http://www.hpmor.com

It has something about giving proper arguments and explanations, I'm sure. Cannot recall it though - its been a while since I read it last time.

What? The fact that you BOUGHT a stolen laptop shows that they ARE NOT worthless. Maybe this would help you out?

If you'll read this, I'll buy it for you.

1. There was a sign on the machine stating the legality of the action, he admitted to doing the transgression multiple times, and was aggressive when confronted. Therefore, he is a thief.
   
   read this: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/04/17/man-facing-525-federal-fine-after-not-paying-for-soda-refill-at-va-hospital/
   
   
2. "If refills aren't free, keep the goddamned fountain behind the counter and don't allow self-serve."
   
   Your statement either assume that people can not be trusted and/or follow basic directions.
   
   My 8 year old niece and I both feel that you should also read this: http://www.amazon.com/Logic-For-Dummies-Mark-Zegarelli/dp/0471799416

Bhai, thoda paisa kharch karke apne liye kuch achha kar lo. 1 2

You’ll be needing these:

https://www.amazon.com/Logic-Dummies-Zegarelli/dp/0471799416/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?keywords=logic+for+dummies&qid=1569879203&sprefix=logic+for&sr=8-3

https://www.amazon.com/Critical-Thinking-Skills-Dummies-Martin/dp/111892472X/ref=mp_s_a_1_5?keywords=logic+for+dummies&qid=1569879203&sprefix=logic+for&sr=8-5

>Thinking that holding a purse makes you less of a man indicates that you view purses negatively because they are associated with women. That makes you sexist.

Whoa, whoa, whoa. Learn some logic, pal. Here's Logic For Dummies, which will suit you perfectly.



This is not sound logic:

John views purses negatively.

Women use purses.

Therefore, John views women negatively.

I mean come the fuck on. Personally, purses don't bother me because they're associated with women; purses bother me because I think purses are fucking stupid. Women use purses to carry around a bunch shit they don't need, but society tells them they need. For example: make-up, lipstick, hair-brushes, combs, nail-polish, and so much other shit. That's why I hate purses. It has nothing to do with what gender is associated with purses, it has to do with the fact that purses are fucking stupid. In conclusion, you're a jackass that needs to learn some basic fucking logic.