Reddit Reddit reviews Main Currents of Marxism: The Founders - The Golden Age - The Breakdown

We found 8 Reddit comments about Main Currents of Marxism: The Founders - The Golden Age - The Breakdown. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Business & Money
Books
Economics
Main Currents of Marxism: The Founders - The Golden Age - The Breakdown
W W Norton Company
Check price on Amazon

8 Reddit comments about Main Currents of Marxism: The Founders - The Golden Age - The Breakdown:

u/fourcrew · 15 pointsr/badpolitics

There's also this follow-up. I'll repost the comment I wrote on /r/fantanoforever.

>Political discourse in the 21st century: regurgitating existing American political narratives on YouTube. I mean, not to be a total apologist for vulgar Internet Marxists, but if you're going to be highly critical of Marxism, please take Anthony's own advice and read a book instead of speaking in discourses that only really reveal a profound lack of understanding of the subject. Kolakowski, I hear, is profoundly revealing here.

>>Read a book man, a book Marx wrote, not by anyone else

>Well that's not fair Anthony, Marxists are rather partial to Engels, Luxemberg, (if they're a tankie) Lenin, and others. If they are non-orthodox, you might also see some Debord, Lukacs, Adorno, Althusser, Jameson, Zizek, and others.

u/satanic_hamster · 4 pointsr/CapitalismVSocialism

Socialism/Communism

A People's History of the World

Main Currents of Marxism

The Socialist System

The Age of... (1, 2, 3, 4)

Marx for our Times

Essential Works of Socialism

Soviet Century

Self-Governing Socialism (Vols 1-2)

The Meaning of Marxism

The "S" Word (not that good in my opinion)

Of the People, by the People

Why Not Socialism

Socialism Betrayed

Democracy at Work

Imagine: Living in a Socialist USA (again didn't like it very much)

The Socialist Party of America (absolute must read)

The American Socialist Movement

Socialism: Past and Future (very good book)

It Didn't Happen Here

Eugene V. Debs

The Enigma of Capital

Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism

A Companion to Marx's Capital (great book)

After Capitalism: Economic Democracy in Action

Capitalism

The Conservative Nanny State

The United States Since 1980

The End of Loser Liberalism

Capitalism and it's Economics (must read)

Economics: A New Introduction (must read)

U.S. Capitalist Development Since 1776 (must read)

Kicking Away the Ladder

23 Things They Don't Tell You About Capitalism

Traders, Guns and Money

Corporation Nation

Debunking Economics

How Rich Countries Got Rich

Super Imperialism

The Bubble and Beyond

Finance Capitalism and it's Discontents

Trade, Development and Foreign Debt

America's Protectionist Takeoff

How the Economy was Lost

Labor and Monopoly Capital

We Are Better Than This

Ancap/Libertarian

Spontaneous Order (disagree with it but found it interesting)

Man, State and Economy

The Machinery of Freedom

Currently Reading

This is the Zodiac Speaking (highly recommend)

u/lemontolha · 3 pointsr/ChristopherHitchens

He called himself a Socialist until the 2000s, joined the British Labour party in 1965 and was part of a "Rosa Luxemburgist-Trotskyist sect" as he called the IS (International Socialists) until the early 70s. He said of himself he was a "Marxist by training" and in 2006 "I am no longer a socialist, but I still am a Marxist" as socialism had stopped to be a viable alternative and a global movement as it was in his youth, and degenerated to corrupt populism a la Hugo Chavez. In god is not great, Hitchens called Marxism his "own secular faith" that "has been shaken and discarded, not without pain." He referred to his period of Marxist faith as "when I was a Marxist."

After reading Hitch 22 though I think that he at least at that time was no kind of Marxist in the conventional sense. He did not believe in the tenets of Marxism (proletarian revolution, the inevitability of capitalisms downfall etc., those things that Marx actually believed in). He was in my opinion rather a post-Marxist intellectual who was still influenced by Marxist discourse, meaning training in dialectical and historical materialism and referring to inner-Marxist arguments, especially those by dissidents, renegades and ex-communists, but also only in very general and undogmatic ways. Maybe you should read "Letters to a Young Contrarian" to get the idea of what he wanted young people to learn from his political development.

Interesting is also what he wrote about Leszek Kolakowski, whom he knew and with whom you should be familiar with if you call yourself a communist. My tip: read Main Currents of Marxism and see if you still want to call yourself that.

u/comment_moderately · 3 pointsr/MapPorn

Any chance you can give us a primer on the ideology & groups represented by each of these? What does the Russian Communist party today believe? (There were many currents in historical communism.)

u/et_tu_bluto · 1 pointr/philosophy

Well, I'm not a socialist or a communist by any stretch, so I can't answer from an insider's perspective (so to speak).

>But why?

If you've got the time and the inclination, this book is the best answer to your questions that I'm aware of. He goes into great detail about the roots of, influences on, and relationships between the various branches of Marxism: http://www.amazon.com/Main-Currents-Marxism-Founders-Breakdown/dp/0393329437

u/kantbot · 1 pointr/KotakuInAction

A lot of social justice type courses today aren't really academic so I wouldn't put too much faith in them, they mostly revolve around arts and crafts projects, watching movies etc.

Some books to consider:

The Pursuit of the Millennium: Revolutionary Millenarians and Mystical Anarchists of the Middle Ages

The German Historicist Tradition

Main Currents of Marxism: The Founders - The Golden Age - The Breakdown

The Open Society and Its Enemies: Plato, Hegel, Marx

u/[deleted] · 1 pointr/DebateCommunism

You can read a brief summary of them in the Epilogue of his book Main Currents of Marxism which is viewable on Amazon. (If that link doesn't bring up the reader immediately, it's page 1206-1215.)

(I don't endorse, or buy all of these claims, but I'm curious what others more familiar with Kolakowski have to say about them. 1. 4. and 6. are what I'm most interested in)

TL;DR:

  1. It's absurd to call Marxism 'Scientific Socialism' because, while the process/framework may be called 'scientific' the end itself (communism) isn't.

  2. This notion of scientific socialism has lead to what he calls the anti-science/anti-intellectual features of Marxism.

  3. That the degenerated Soviet state was not an obvious result of Marxism, but was certainly compatible with it.

  4. Marxism is a logically consistent framework connecting various values which do not work together empirically.

  5. Marxism is dead as an explanatory system, with no hope for revival except by 'true believers'

  6. The 'Communist' 'end-goal' of a stateless, classless, society is itself a form of totalitarianism which would necessitate a society made not of free choice of association, but of bureaucratic consensus.