Reddit reviews Modal Logic for Philosophers

>First off, you forgot to drop your logic library on me as you promised.

I could try to teach calculus to a fish, I suspect both would be equally effective. But here you go: https://www.amazon.com/Modal-Logic-Philosophers-James-Garson/dp/0521682290 Buy the e-reader copy and start reading. I doubt very much you will, and if you do, I doubt very much you'll make a sincere effort. You're not interested in being smart, that takes work, you're content with the mere appearance. You're vapid and shallow.

>Second, no need for ad hominem.

Not anywhere here have I engaged in ad hominem reasoning. You're too stupid to understand the concepts you use? Pathetic.

>Yes, I don't believe fascists deserve a platform. It's the same reason they don't allow footage of Hitler or Nazi rhetoric in Germany

I think that's a major mistake. The benefit of some bad ideas around is that we get to beat those ideas up with good ideas and sharpen our intellect, the alternative is something we could call "dead dogma." When ideas, even good ones, remain unchallenged for too long, the people holding them forget why, and they make poor cases for why those good ideas are good. That's the breeding ground for fanaticism, for extremism, for small minded people like you.

>or why here in the US you can't yell "fire" in a theater when there's no threat.

Absolutely not. If you can't tell the difference between political speech and speech that will likely result in injury by natural reaction, then you're not smart enough to justify talking to. And I sincerely mean that. The US does NOT abridge or even cool political speech. To conflate that with screaming "fire" in a crowded theater is one of the dumbest things I've heard in a while, and it's done so with arrogance that you actually have a cogent point. Fuck you're sad.