Reddit reviews Public Health Ethics

Okay read through the PDF (did not go through the entire appendixes or check if the citations were accurate). I think most science undergrads could roast the article on a pike. Even if this alleged paper was worth the bytes of data it took up it would be torn apart in any decent peer review journal. So the main argument is “why didn’t you do a placebo test for this vaccine? Huh? Huh? Gotcha science!” Except the author (perhaps intentionally misleading) tries to make a straw man argument that without a placebo test then vaccines are unproven and should be halted which is insane. Look up a credible peer reviewed vaccine paper (I recommend https://www.cochrane.org). There are numerous trials/records for control and efficacy. There is a range of research that goes into drug evaluations (extremely strict and takes decades).

*I agree with OP that vaccinations should be mandatory to be enrolled in public schools. But don’t agree with “forced” vaccines which I think anti-vax individuals feel they are being pressured into. Parents can choose but realize they lose some public services. Public health ethics is very interesting and directly tackles this issue. Recommended reading (https://www.amazon.ca/Public-Health-Ethics-Stephen-Holland/dp/0745662196).