Reddit Reddit reviews Samsung 850 PRO - 1TB - 2.5-Inch SATA III Internal SSD (MZ-7KE1T0BW)

We found 22 Reddit comments about Samsung 850 PRO - 1TB - 2.5-Inch SATA III Internal SSD (MZ-7KE1T0BW). Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Electronics
Computers & Accessories
Data Storage
Internal Solid State Drives
Samsung 850 PRO - 1TB - 2.5-Inch SATA III Internal SSD (MZ-7KE1T0BW)
The World's First Consumer SSD Powered by Samsung V-NAND Technology, Ideal for Hardcore PC Gamers, Heavy PC Users, Business ProfessionalUltimate Sequential Read/Write Performance : Up to 550MB/s and 520MB/s Respectively, and Random Read/Write IOPS Performance : Up to 100K and 90K RespectivelyPerformance, Reliability, Energy Efficiency, and Industry-Leading 10-year Limited WarrantyIncluded Contents: 2.5” (7mm) SATA III (6GB/s) SSD & User Manual (All Other Cables, Screws, Brackets Not Included)Free download of Samsung Data Migration and Magician software available for easy installation and SSD managementWindows 10/8/7/Vista SP1 and above (32/64 bit), Widows Server 2008 (32/64 bit), Linux Compatible
Check price on Amazon

22 Reddit comments about Samsung 850 PRO - 1TB - 2.5-Inch SATA III Internal SSD (MZ-7KE1T0BW):

u/kdma81 · 303 pointsr/pcmasterrace

No, I'm sorry, I'm not going to let you win today Charles.

This is as of today.

Comparable specs on the drive

Edit: Dude what year is that Macbook from? That looks like it's a 2010 or something.

u/FalzHunar · 20 pointsr/pcmasterrace

http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-2-5-Inch-SATA-Internal-MZ-7KE1T0BW/dp/B00LF10KTE

$600

I'm still saving for my new PC / laptop and this guy just went ahead and buy a single drive for $600.

Wow. Just wow. Grats!

u/kickababyv2 · 5 pointsr/pcmasterrace

What are you going on about? $125 is a steal for a 1TB SSD. He went EVO because that's what he could get. He obviously wasn't in a store where he had options.

For reference:

Samsung 850 EVO - 1TB $318.77 @ Amazon

Samsung 850 PRO - 1TB $419.19 @ Amazon

u/efreak2004 · 4 pointsr/buildapcsales

Amazon has slightly better prices on the 256gb and 1tb:

1tb 850 pro for $419

256gb 850 pro for $127.88

u/kabbage123 · 3 pointsr/videography

On my editing machine, I have a 1TB Samsung Evo Pro as my 'work drive' which houses my active projects. I used to use a cheaper Sandisk drive but it gets so much stress that I kept burning them out.

I keep my OS and programs on a separate 248GB Samsung Evo Pro, and I also have a cheapo 128GB SSD for a cache disk.

I then keep a 'hot storage' archive which is a RAID'ed NAS with 8 x 4TB WD RED drives. I use the Synology DS1815+ which has been incredible.

Every 4 months, I back everything up on cold (i.e. uninstalled) 8TB RED drives. Down the line I'll probably offload the 4TBs and use the existing 8TBs as part of a RAID array.

I really try not to use my RAID for editing unless I'm in a real jam. It works fine actually, I just don't like to put unnecessary stress on it.

My archive system is worth more than my two main cameras, but it completely makes sense to me to invest in a bulletproof archival system.

u/svideo · 3 pointsr/storage

They are suggesting a $13k price tag for a 13TB SSD using capacity-tier flash on a single 6G SATA channel.

If you spent something like $7100 for 8 x 2TB Samsung SATA SSDs and $600 for a decent 8 port card you'd have >$5k left to spend on a new server enclosure (if needed). In return you'd get 8 times the read performance.

Modern SSDs are already constrained by 6GB I/O channels. Putting this much capacity behind such an interface doesn't seem like a great idea for any workload that would expect performance, when you could accomplish the same thing for less money and much faster throughput with separate devices.

u/Norman4 · 2 pointsr/buildapc

The 850 pro is now selling for $549.99 on Amazon. That's only $150 more than the 840 evo, and you're getting a pro instead of an evo, an 850 instead of an 840, and a guarantee the performance won't decrease. As for whether the 850 evo will be better, I heard it'll be cheaper and have bigger than 1 tb size options, but that the pro should still edge it out in durability/performance.

The price drop has been nuts recently, so there's definitely something in the air.

u/goodnames679 · 2 pointsr/pcmasterrace

Or just nab two 850 Pros

About a fifth of the read/write speeds but still ridiculously fast and only like 1/10th of the price

Though I can understand the need for the higher read/write speeds in some situations

u/Defiant001 · 1 pointr/bapcsalescanada
u/Find_the_Door · 1 pointr/PS4

Got this puppy on the way - gonna purchase a new PS4 along with it to ensure any of the recent performance errors I've had aren't my console.


Here's the beast:

Samsung 850 Pro 1 TB 2.5-Inch SATA III Internal SSD (MZ-7KE1T0BW) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00LF10KTE/ref=cm_sw_r_awd_6QNPub1KVJJBT

u/brianjenkins94 · 1 pointr/gamedev

I just built this:

Parts:

u/I-Made-You-Read-This · 1 pointr/HardwareSwapUK

(Price for new items , in GBP):

I can find them from 200 up to 400 but there are also many good ones in between there too. Like this one

I dunno if it's a good idea to buy SSD used, but I wouldn't.. There might be cheaper retailers than Amazon too but I'm not all too sure about that.

u/mbark_qa · 1 pointr/FFXV

[here ](Samsung 850 PRO - 1TB - 2.5-Inch SATA III Internal SSD (MZ-7KE1T0BW) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00LF10KTE/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_4jLtybB5YWS14)

u/laserlemons · 1 pointr/buildapc

Why is there such a big price difference in SSDs? Is there a big enough difference between these two to make up for the cost?

u/sirjogurtkiff · 1 pointr/videos

Wasn't this exact one but there is plenty to choose from :)

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00LF10KTE/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_dp_T2_Il4CzbM2PVQZF

u/Fujka · 1 pointr/HyperV

I just spec'd this out recently.

Synology RS3614xs+ - http://www.synology.com/en-us/products/overview/RS3614xs+

Samsung 850 Pro 1TB SSD x10 - http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-Electronics-Internal-Version-MZ-7KE1T0BW/dp/B00LF10KTE/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1405390800&sr=1-2&keywords=samsung+850

That puts you at 16k. Get 2 more SSDs for the caching slots. We are using 128 GB ssds since they don't need to be large. This set up is shared between 3 Dell R420 servers. With a total of 70 VMs (55 Windows 7, 15 server 2012/2008)

It is still important to backup. We use Unitrends to backup all of our machines.