Reddit reviews Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 Art DC HSM Lens for Canon
We found 24 Reddit comments about Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 Art DC HSM Lens for Canon. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
F1.8 maximum apertureF16 minimumRing-type ultrasonic-type AF motor with full-time manual focusing, 72mm filter sizeMinimum focusing distance 28 cm/ 11.0 in. USB Dock compatible, MC-11 compatible.Available in Canon EF (EF-S), Sony Alpha (dot), Nikon f (DX) mounts0.23 optical Zoom
/u/BigOleBallsack - I would get neither. With a $5000 budget, unless you need to take still photos, I recommend an interchangeable lens Super 35 camcorder instead.
By the time you buy ND filters, an XLR audio solution with decent preamps and rigging (e.g., a top handle) to compensate for the GH5's or the A7s II's still camera ergonomics - you might as well buy a real video camera.
In your price range, I recommend a [$2595 Super 35 4K JVC LS300] (https://www.amazon.com/JVC-GY-LS300CHU-Ultra-Camcorder-Handle/dp/B00USBVISE/ref=as_li_ss_tl?m=A17MC6HOH9AVE6&s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1487897950&linkCode=ll1&tag=battleforthew-20) with a [$399 Metabones Canon to micro 4/3 autofocusing adapter] (https://www.amazon.com/Metabones-Smart-Adapter-Thirds-Camera/dp/B014C1BF7O//ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=battleforthew-20) and something like a [$799 Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 lens] (https://www.amazon.com/Sigma-18-35mm-F1-8-Lens-Canon/dp/B00DBL0NLQ//ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=battleforthew-20).
The LS300 has these features that still cameras lack:
I have shot with this camera, it is a solid pro camcorder with the ability to produce high quality 4K video at a reasonable price.
Here are a few examples of the image quality this camera can produce:
Narrative
Music Video
Corporate/Commercial/Interview
Live Event
Wedding
J-LOG on Vimeo (please watch at 4K and your monitor's highest resolution)
1080p on Vimeo
J-LOG on YouTube (please watch at 2160p and your monitor's highest resolution)
Non-LOG Gammas on YouTube (2160p)
This camera is not perfect. It has a tiny viewfinder and LCD, so you'll probably need to buy an EVF - and, although it has 4:2:2 chroma subsampling, it is still an 8-bit camera.
But for less than $3000, the LS300 is the most flexible large sensor, interchangeable lens 4K Super 35 camcorder on the market.
Hope this is helpful and good luck with finding the right camera for your needs!
Sigma 18-35 1.8. One of my favorite zooms ever for a crop sensor camera. It's heavy, but a phenomenal lens and great focal length range on a crop sensor. Only drawback is no IS, but the image quality and versatility make up for it and more.
When it comes to video I'd say the Sigma 18-35. The image quality of this lens is ridiculous, it lets in a lot of light, it has a fixed aperture, excellent build quality and you have actual zooming ability which I think is much more useful for video than using a prime. It is used by many as their video lens. I would normally not recommend this one to a stills shooter that uses the viewfinder but for those taking video and using Live View, it is damn good!
I own the Sigma 18-35 and it lives up to all the hype it gets.
A Sigma 18-35mm f1.8 would be a solid choice if you can afford one. That's a fairly useful focal range for a crop sensor camera like yours. It also has a wide aperture across the entire zoom range to improve the light it gathers. That's definitely important if you're using it indoors, since you can't count of being able to control the lighting.
I'm using a Canon 60D with a Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM ART.
https://www.amazon.com/Sigma-18-35mm-F1-8-Lens-Canon/dp/B00DBL0NLQ
We where in a hurry taking the shots so focus is not spot on. But I like the lens very much :)
Amazon sell it for $850
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00DBL0NLQ/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?qid=1374644998&sr=8-2&pi=AC_SX110_SY190
Dx0mark review
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Reviews/Sigma-18-35mm-F1.8-DC-HSM-A-Canon-mount-lens-review-fixed-focal-length-quality-in-a-zoom
Its basically a zoom with the quality of your 50mm for its entire range, 18-35mm
I think some common focal lengths people try to have in their kits are...
For people with a Canon 1.6 crop camera...
The Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 (~$800 USD) would be close to the 16mm and 35mm focal lengths.
The Sigma 30mm F1.4 (~$500 USD) would be close to the 50mm focal length (30mm x 1.6 crop = 48mm)
The Canon 50mm F1.8 (~$110 USD) would be close to the 85mm focal length (50mm x 1.6 crop = 80mm)
Metabones' Speed Booster is not compatible with Canon EF-S lenses (due to an extended protrusion at the rear of the lens), but it is completely compatible with third-party APS-C lenses (e.g. Sigma, Tokina, etc.).
Here are a few wide-angle options:
You may also be interested in native wide-angle lenses for astrophotography purposes. They may not be fast, but they may provide better quality at these ultra-wide angles, especially compared to non-Metabones focal reducers. Here are a couple options:
Thank you!!
http://www.amazon.com/Sigma-210101-18-35mm-Canon-APS-C/dp/B00DBL0NLQ/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1449763949&sr=8-3&keywords=sigma+18-35mm+f1.8
Is this what you would recommend?
Metabones Ultra Speed Booster & Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8.
Yeah for me it was my upgrade from my kit lens, it was a choice between the 17-50 or the Sigma Art 18-35 f1.8 but I couldn't justify the price for my 1st lens purchase!
Hi everybody.
At the moment I'm shooting pictures with a Canon EOS 450D (EOS Rebel XSi) togheter with Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM. I've been pretty happy with this so far. But I feel the need to upgrade because of the following reason:
So. I'd like one lens that is good for the following:
I know that's a lot of different areas but I believe I could manage find one single lens that would work alright for all of those purposes.
What I've been looking at:
Which one would be the most logical for me to buy? Zoom is really not that important for me (at least I don't think so). The first two ones also fit full format cameras and it's not impossible that I'd like to upgrade the camera body too sometime during the following years.
I'd really appreciate any kind of advice, thanks! :)
I'm no expert when it comes to DSLR's, but as someone who started with a 700D then moved up to a 70D after three years learning the basics, go for the 70D first. The auto-focus is phenomenally better, higher megapixel count and wifi connectivity. In terms of quality they're all pretty much the same and a beginner such as yourself wouldn't really be able to notice many of the main differences, but if you're going to throw some cash at a starting line I'd make sure you're in the perfect place rather than wanting to upgrade later down the road. :)
Another pointer from my experience would be to get a variety of glass, best quality you can afford. It doesn't really matter which camera you go with when you're starting out if you have some decent lenses to mix up your shots. Get yourself a wide angle, a prime and a zoom; 10-18mm, 50mm/35mm & 75-300mm. That's your starter kit, then upgrade to better quality lenses and cameras as you go - worth noting that the ones I linked are all the lowest quality (except the 35mm) considering you're probably on a tight budget, but you'll still get some sweet footage. It simply means you'll be able to get a wider variety of shots and you'll be prepared for most occasions - the beautiful city skyline scene, the crispy portrait with a bokehed out background, and the "Oh! There's a deer 50ft away! Let's capture it on video rather than running up to it and being kicked in the balls!".
One other thing that might be worth mentioning is that I always carry a point-and-shoot with me. My choice is the Sony RX100 IV - shoots in 4k, incredible slow motion (up to 1000fps), slog2 recording (higher dynamic range to make your scenes look incredible after colour grading), no hassle with interchangeable lenses and in my opinion is generally more convenient than lugging a DSLR around with you when you're on holiday somewhere.
Throw me a message if you have any questions, or just leave a reply and I'll check it when I can. Here're a few video samples for you to compare your possibilities: Canon 70D Auto-Focus, Sony RX100 IV Sample.
EDIT: Fixed up some grammar & wanted to throw you a few accessories incase you hadn't thought that far ahead:
• Gorillapod: Your trusty ol' wrap-around-a-tree tripod. Way more versatile than your traditional kit and easier to travel with.
• Røde Shotgun Microphone: The best quality microphone you're going to be able to find for the price. Canon's default mic sucks balls, so grab one of those if you run with the DSLR.
• Class 10, 64GB SD Card: If you decide to grab the Sony RX100 IV, you'll want one of these to shoot in 4K otherwise your camera will just give up after a few seconds. If you run with the Canon, grab this anyway for faster transfer speeds, but it's really not necessary.
Sweet dude, we'll get that one then! Thanks a lot. Could you please confirm for me that this is the correct one? https://www.amazon.ca/Sigma-210101-18-35mm-Canon-APS-C/dp/B00DBL0NLQ
There's a few on Amazon right now http://smile.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00DBL0NLQ/ref=dp_olp_new?ie=UTF8&condition=new
Glad I could help, /u/SausageLegs.
Here's someone who has used the [Sigma 18-35 for Canon] (http://amzn.to/1weOPSA) with both a [generic focal reducer] (http://amzn.to/1weOYp0) and a [straight EF to MFT adapter] (http://amzn.to/1rKNzSR) (neither of which had a tripod foot) and doesn't seem to have had any issues:
http://danieljohnpeters.com/2014/05/14/gh4-2/
You would need a much bigger lens than the Sigma for it to be a problem.
Best of luck,
Bill
Thanks for your answer !
GH4 is definitely the way to go.
I forgot to say that i also owned this speedbooster-like that i used for my GH2.
The main concern that i have is witch lens is good for landscape, i saw some people said that the SLR MAGIC 12mm T1.6 is very good, and i'm also afraid that a non-zoom lens is not versatile when you are hiking in the moutains or climbing.
I'm not against buying a Metabones Speedbooster XL, my travel friend use a 6D for photography, if we can share lens. I saw the SIGMA ART 18-35 F1.8.
It's giving me headaches !
Actually it's Bonne chance ! (or you are a huge fan of Taken)
Get This Lens and a Canon T3i body.
Questions at end is the important part, context first in case you're interested
I’m growing out of my kit lens and looking for a replacement walk-around lens for general usage (holidays, family gatherings, nights with friends). The two main choices are the Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS or the Sigma 18-35mm F1.8. Both have tracked to similar prices on amazon UK (£650 for either today).
I like the extra 1.5 stops of the Sigma, although that is partly balanced by the 3-stop compensation claimed by the Canon. However, I’m worried about the reduced reach of the 18-35.
I already have the Canon 50mm so that would be a replacement for any portraits and I’d keep my current 18-55 kit lens but I wouldn’t want to switch too much from a walk-around lens. Shorter and longer focal lengths are covered by other lenses I already have.
In an attempt to answer my own question I reviewed 835 recent photos from similar events to where I’d use the new lens. I collated the focal length of each shot and charted the results. In short, I shoot a lot at either end of my focal length range and should never buy a 40mm lens! The analysis shows that the 18-35 focal range excludes 28% of the photos I’ve previously shot. But half of those are just “get as close as possible” shots. I know that focal length is not the same as zoom and that I can crop photos instead to make the subject bigger in the frame. This is where the questions come in:
Thanks in advance, and please feel free to laugh at the fact that nearly half my photos on a zoom lens are at the min and max lengths!
This is the type of recommendations I was looking for. Thank you so much.
This Rokinon 35mm T1.5 keeps popping up as a lens to go with, the more research I do. I don't think there is going to be any getting around investing in it. Is it redundant to pair that with this ?
Reasoning behind the computer is to be able to write and take photos/video as much as I want.
The Kindle I intend to read on; I may go for the lowest-end model instead of the Paperwhite, but I want to take books without adding unnecessary bulk to what I have to pack.
The Canon Powershot I intend to carry with me almost everywhere, in order to have a photography tool with me at all times. It's compact and, with custom firmware, allows for a lot of DSLR-ish functions.
The GoPro is the hardest purchase for me to justify, because at present I don't have anything really specific I intend to use it for which couldn't be done with the Canon.
A final option would be to take the point and shoot as well as my T3i. The trouble with this is my current lenses don't give me the quality I want from my camera. I've been thinking about buying the Sigma 18-30, but it's much more than I can afford on this trip. Also, carry-on baggage space would be significantly limited by taking a DSLR.
What are the difference between these 2 lens? I have a Canon 70d.
http://www.amazon.com/Sigma-210110-18-35mm-APS-C-sensors/dp/B00DE74U8O/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1416922725&sr=8-3&keywords=sigma+18-35mm+f1.8+dc+hsm&pebp=1416922776688
http://www.amazon.com/Sigma-210101-18-35mm-Canon-APS-C/dp/B00DBL0NLQ/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1416923104&sr=8-1&keywords=sigma+18-35mm+f1.8+dc+hsm&pebp=1416923140110
I do have a crop sensor lens. Can the first link fit in my DSLR?
Hey, I took a quick look at that video and it doesn't seem like it would be too difficult to match that style of production. It looks like he might be using two cameras to film (one wide shot for him speaking to the camera, one lowered and tighter shot focused on the action on the table) but you could replicate this by using one camera with a zoom lens and a tripod that tilts down.
Affiliate links below
As for budget camera that fits this niche, I would recommend getting a refurbished Canon 80D (https://amzn.to/2EiB0OP). There's nothing flashy about this camera but it is very user friendly and offers a lot of good video features in an affordable body. It's over your $700 camera budget but not by far. If that budget is a hard limit then I would recommend going down to the Canon SL2 (https://amzn.to/2ElJ40Z) which offers similar features but generally lower quality and one area that it really lacks compared to the 80D is the autofocus.
For both of these you would want to upgrade out of the kit lens to something that opens to a wider aperture because the style you are emulating uses a lot of out of focus elements. I would suggest eventually going to the Sigma 18-35 1.8 (https://amzn.to/2SyGZE6) but try to find a used one because buying used lenses is a great way to save money.
For lighting, I recommend just getting one good light to start, a reflector/bounce board kit and watching some tutorials. You can do a lot with 1 light and a good understanding of the basics.
Something like this for the light: (https://amzn.to/2SyGZE6)
Cheap light stand: (https://amzn.to/2H7nnoy)
Reflector kit: (https://amzn.to/2Syi6si)
So all in to start you would be looking at about $1100-1200 and if you want to upgrade down the road the best place to do that would be in high quality lenses