>I'll be honest, this is the least sense anyone has made in a comment in this thread yet.
I'd say just the opposite. I'm sick and tired of overpopulation extremists and fanatics, and I'm happy to point out the logical flaws and consequences of their asinine positions.
>Where in the fuck do you see me proposing we kill people?
As I said, it's a consequence of your article of faith. In order to reduce the population to what you call 'sustainable levels' people have to die - through inaction, through action. Either way, you're killing them. (It's important to note that the logical case for your suicide doesn't require murder of others in your proposal, but it's a nice bonus).
>How in the fuck would logarithmic growth be irrelevant to the issue of a population explosion?
Funny, I didn't hear an explosion.
>How in the fuck do you see this as me trying to change peoples lifestyles for my own personal gain?
This entire thread is based on the idea that overpopulation is bad and should be stopped. Your premise starts with getting other people to not have children. You want other people to change their lifestyle. The vehemence with which you are rejecting an extreme personal sacrifice indicates to me that you reject the notion of self-sacrifice to bring about your goal.
>You put more spin on my conversation trigger than the entire team at Fox news could ever dream of.
I don't know what a 'conversation trigger' is - but no, deductive reasoning is not 'spin.'
>You've got to tell me what you're on, so I can stay the fuck away from it.
>I'll be honest, this is the least sense anyone has made in a comment in this thread yet.
I'd say just the opposite. I'm sick and tired of overpopulation extremists and fanatics, and I'm happy to point out the logical flaws and consequences of their asinine positions.
>Where in the fuck do you see me proposing we kill people?
As I said, it's a consequence of your article of faith. In order to reduce the population to what you call 'sustainable levels' people have to die - through inaction, through action. Either way, you're killing them. (It's important to note that the logical case for your suicide doesn't require murder of others in your proposal, but it's a nice bonus).
>How in the fuck would logarithmic growth be irrelevant to the issue of a population explosion?
Funny, I didn't hear an explosion.
>How in the fuck do you see this as me trying to change peoples lifestyles for my own personal gain?
This entire thread is based on the idea that overpopulation is bad and should be stopped. Your premise starts with getting other people to not have children. You want other people to change their lifestyle. The vehemence with which you are rejecting an extreme personal sacrifice indicates to me that you reject the notion of self-sacrifice to bring about your goal.
>You put more spin on my conversation trigger than the entire team at Fox news could ever dream of.
I don't know what a 'conversation trigger' is - but no, deductive reasoning is not 'spin.'
>You've got to tell me what you're on, so I can stay the fuck away from it.
I'm not surprised to see you're interested in [this](http://www.amazon.com/Symbolic-Logic-Irving-M-Copi/dp/0023249803/ref=sr_1_5?.