Reddit reviews T.W Evans Cordage 26-011 1/4-Inch by 100-Feet 5 Star Manila Rope
We found 7 Reddit comments about T.W Evans Cordage 26-011 1/4-Inch by 100-Feet 5 Star Manila Rope. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
Great for decorative and landscaping projectsOnly high quality fibers are usedContains oil in the manufacturing processPackaged in a shrink wrapped coiletteWorking Load 81 lbs
You should spare one commission for this
a short drop and a sudden stop
If you want this one seems pretty hard and long if you want to to this with your family
https://www.amazon.ca/T-W-Evans-Cordage-26-011-100-Feet/dp/B00DKA3S6A/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1518031238&sr=8-2&keywords=rope
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DKA3S6A/ref=s9_acsd_zwish_hd_bw_b292I_c_x_w/141-8013449-5029347?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=merchandised-search-6&pf_rd_r=J8MY7R652SB2NDKXPRE8&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=b949820f-ff03-5be8-b745-f0a5e56b98c9&pf_rd_i=511394
i see this comes with amazon prime
K
Y
S
I’m more of a bowler hat guy than an fedora guy. But I will take your advice and buy some rope. But I have a question. Should I go with this hemp rope(https://www.amazon.com/Twisted-Manila-Rope-Hemp-100/dp/B01GH0MHG6?ref_=Oct_BSellerS_511394_3) or this Manila rope(https://www.amazon.com/T-W-Evans-Cordage-26-011-100-Feet/dp/B00DKA3S6A?ref_=Oct_BSellerS_511394_9)? Or do you recommend another type of rope?
Oh my god you're a fucking moron. Did you even read my comment? If you are discussing theory and this is your reply to my comment, you have a fundamental misunderstanding of the theory. The other explanation is you read something incorrectly, which wouldn't be such a problem but then you adopt such a cunt tone in your reply.
In theory
>Anything that can be done with a regex can be done with a finite automaton, and vice versa
Where did I state that recognising an email is impossible with finite automata? If something can be recognised by a finite automaton, it can be done with a regex.
Your original comment said that you cannot do this with regex but can with finite automata, but in theory
>They are equivalent in their expressive power, they both recognise the set of regular languages.
Anybody who has a semblance of an idea of what they're talking about will agree that they are in theory equivalent. So you can do it with regex, in theory.
Your article that you linked but didn't read carefully, states this same fact.
>And can you fully implement the complex grammars in the RFCs in your regex parser in a readable way?
It talks about the practical issues, e.g. being able to do it in a readable way with regex, because in fucking theory they are equivalent in their expressive power.
You may find the below useful:
https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Theory-Computation-Michael-Sipser/dp/113318779X
Alternatively:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DKA3S6A/ref=s9_acsd_top_hd_bw_b292I_c_x_5_w?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=merchandised-search-3&pf_rd_r=DQJA7YYF6XRPQ9DCCW1S&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=b949820f-ff03-5be8-b745-f0a5e56b98c9&pf_rd_i=511394
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001E95R3G/ref=s9_acsd_top_hd_bw_bFfLP_c_x_1_w?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=merchandised-search-4&pf_rd_r=MXQ2SVBM01QEAAET2X18&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=c842552a-f9c9-5abd-8c7d-f1340c84cb6d&pf_rd_i=3733851