Reddit reviews The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions

Hahaha the air quotes on evidence. The obvious bias and air of perceived superiority is why most dont even bother with people like you. Im not claiming to know what happened, all im saying is the official story is FULL of holes and just straight up untruths. Fact.

Heres a start for you. Chock full of references and footnotes. If youre ACTUALLY interested, its a great read.

https://www.amazon.com/11-Commission-Report-Omissions-Distortions/dp/1566565847

Edit: And here's a link to some "cliffs notes" of the book, with references to the pages the details can be found, though i doubt you'll look or respond at this point: http://www.911truth.org/the-911-commission-report-a-571-page-lie/

All you do on reddit is to offer conjecture about accuracy of conspiracy theories. Read David Ray Griffin's book for a post-commission, concrete review of all their inaccuracies (the cover-up) and then offer us a conjecture as to why there was such massive fact-hiding. Because they wanted to protect Osama? Pakistan? Or Israel and the massive military industrial complex that the US has become?

BTW Daily Kos is no more reputable than Zogby, so ad hominem is not really going to get you very far.

The main reason why I don't believe the official story is because I haven't ignored their evidence and analysis.

If I had ignored it all, I would be just another average Joe believing the official narrative. I wouldn't have seen the holes in the story, or all the different attempts at explaining the collapse while still failing to come up with anything that holds up to scrutiny, or anything at all in the case of the 2 towers. I wouldn't have noticed all the lies from government officials, nor the omission of critical statements in the report.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Commission-Report-Omissions-Distortions/dp/1566565847

http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/927-nists-wtc-7-reports-filled-with-fantasy-fiction-and-fraud-intro

You can't make those issues disappear, yet you try very hard to create the illusion that they do not exist. Wouldn't you be more successful in your undertakings if you were just a tiny bit honest and admitted there are issues with the official story? Or is that reserved for people with a better understanding of the events that happened on that day?

that's your source?

here's my source for 9/11 being an inside job

https://www.amazon.com/11-Commission-Report-Omissions-Distortions/dp/1566565847

did you even read the link you've given?

even if you believe what he's saying, he says a pakistani official betrayed and gave up osama to americans. not pakistanis cooperating with americans.

> Fordi en youtubevideo laget av en eller annen fyr som tar folk ut av kontekst er ikke akkurat god kildekritikk

Hvordan kan du påstå det? Du har jo ikke sett den en gang.

Dokumentaren er mildt sagt veldokumentert og bygger på denne boka etter det jeg vet.

> https://www.amazon.com/11-Commission-Report-Omissions-Distortions/dp/1566565847


Informasjonen som presenters i den kommer fra offisielle kilder.

Kanskje bør du spørre deg selv om hva du er villig til å tro, før du undersøker dette nærmere.

https://www.amazon.com/11-Commission-Report-Omissions-Distortions/dp/1566565847/ref=la_B000APTCK4_1_6/155-5547846-0366359?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1488245765&sr=1-6

A heavily sourced book all about it.

Thanks, I’ll check them out.

Edit: Links to "The Demon Haunted World" pdf file from Carl Sagan, and a link to buy The Skeptics Guide to the Universe? Not exactly what I had in mind to re-open 9/11 theories..

If you want to continue a friendly discussion, I've attached some links below that you might wanna check out if you're curious.

Here's The 9/11 Commission Report. The official one.

And here's a link to The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions.

Footage from WTC Building 7 claimed to have fallen from 'office fires'. Complete madness.


Here's a good one. Dick Cheney admitting that he authorized to have Flight 93 shot down, but interesting that in The 9/11 Commission Report it only refers to Flight 93 ending in "a crash". Nothing is mentioned about the military shooting down Flight 93. The debris was found for over a mile radius, and the body of the plane was blown to smithereens. But the public was led to believe that it simply "crashed."

There were no plane parts found in the wreckage of the Pentagon and the camera surveillance from the explosion was tampered with.

And the motherload of info and images, September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor.. Loose Change was good, but it hasn't been updated in over 10 years. This new doc just came out in 2014.

Anyway, nice chatting with you.

The author slams others for not providing evidence for their point of view and yet provides very little for his own. While there are certainly inconsistencies between 9/11 Truthers, try reading the Offical 9/11 Commission Report (see Griffin - http://www.amazon.com/11-Commission-Report-Omissions-Distortions/dp/1566565847). It's important to remember that our government has attempted moving the population towards support of war in the past. Today's reddit even included an article about such a topic (see ABC News - http://www.truthera.com/2007/05/29/abc-news-uncovers-operation-northwoods/). It's shocking if you haven't thought about the history of imperialism in America (and in the world), but it fits perfectly well within the policies established since World War II (see Chomsky - http://www.chomsky.info/talks/19850319.htm).

"The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States was established on November 27, 2002, by President George W. Bush and the United States Congress, with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger initially appointed to head the commission. However, Kissinger resigned only weeks after being appointed, because he would have been obliged to disclose the clients of his private consulting business."

"George W. Bush - President; testimony not under oath. The session was not officially transcribed because the White House considered it a "private meeting" in which highly classified information would be discussed."

"Dick Cheney - Vice President; testimony not under oath. The session was not officially transcribed because the White House considered it a "private meeting" in which highly classified information would be discussed. Testimony took place in the Oval Office."

Sounds legit!

http://www.amazon.com/The-Commission-Report-Omissions-Distortions/dp/1566565847