Reddit reviews The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering
We found 14 Reddit comments about The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.
Verso
Everything you know about Hitler and WWII is conditioned into you by a joint government-corporate-academic military grade psychological operation that's been running almost continuously since the end of the war. It ramped up big time in the 70's.
https://www.amazon.com/Holocaust-Industry-Reflections-Exploitation-Suffering/dp/1781685614
https://www.amazon.com/German-Villainy-Benton-Bradberry-2012-07-03/dp/B01FEK8ZKM/ref=sr_1_fkmrnull_6?keywords=myth+of+german+villainy&qid=1556886600&s=books&sr=1-6-fkmrnull
What's funny is that Spencer didn't salute at that event. He raised a glass of whiskey. Every shot the MSM uses is a pulled back phone camera behind someone's head. There are many other cameras at the event though and he's clearly just raising his glass. Several attendees at the event did salute, the cold calculating intellectual and political powerhouse Tia 'Tequila' was one of them, and I can assure your her and the others had not the faintest idea about fascism and national socialism and were just doing it to be edgy.
Your post also seems to assume we are offended to be linked to Hitler and the national socialists. Many in the alt right are not. Many of us are are unabashed 3rd positionists (aka as fashists or national socialists). The 3rd positionist wing of the alt right strongly dissuades nazi paraphernalia, especially at public events. You can be confident that anyone with a big swastika flag is a spook. For example nobody knew who the fuck this guy was.
The dissident community isn't afraid to seriously look at the source history and the context of what Hitler did and what he was fighting for. If you were to truly explore what really went on during both wars and how the family and tribe that shall not be named manipulated and orchestrated them you'd probably change your tune about Hitler. Instead most people allow their opinion to be shaped for them by slick manipulation of consensus. I could show you several examples of these public consensus manipulation events but it would bump up against rule 6. The Phillip Rushton Suzuki debate is one example.
If you're starting to read his books, I recommend picking up ["The Holocaust Industry"] (https://www.amazon.com/Holocaust-Industry-Reflections-Exploitation-Suffering/dp/1781685614/ref=pd_sim_14_4?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=1781685614&pd_rd_r=97d5364c-5a0c-11e8-a956-456fc52f333f&pd_rd_w=16qEm&pd_rd_wg=1g1Mc&pf_rd_i=desktop-dp-sims&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_p=7967298517161621930&pf_rd_r=0T0GZ21H6HQKNTF72WSZ&pf_rd_s=desktop-dp-sims&pf_rd_t=40701&psc=1&refRID=0T0GZ21H6HQKNTF72WSZ), ["Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict"] (https://www.amazon.com/Image-Reality-Israel-Palestine-Conflict-Revised/dp/1859844421/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1526587388&sr=1-1&keywords=image+and+reality+of+the+israel-palestine+conflict&dpID=414Zbglcz4L&preST=_SY291_BO1,204,203,200_QL40_&dpSrc=srch), and [his most recent book] (https://www.amazon.com/Gaza-Inquest-into-Its-Martyrdom/dp/0520295714).
"The Holocaust Industry" isn't as provocative now as it is was when he first wrote the book, but it still solidly holds up today. An troubling insight into the "exploitation of Jewish suffering," as he states. It's fairly short compared his other works, but that's the work which brought him into the spotlight.
"Image and Reality" is a good starting point with Finkelstein on understanding the conflict, as he dissects, piece-by-piece, common false talking points and assertions over the conflict (Joan Peters, Benny Morris, Abba Eban, amongst others); his introduction to the book's second edition provides an excellent overview of the history.
Though, it'd be an understatement not to recommend his latest book. By far the largest amount of footnotes, and he affirms by his maxim of making the book as well-sourced and truthful "as is humanly possible". He details the Mavi Marmara incident, Operation Cast Lead, and Operation Protective Edge, and the inconsistent reporting of human rights organizations. The book's final statements, especially, cut deep. Certainly his best work, indeed his magnum opus.
Sometime later on I might go through "Beyond Chutzpah" (it's labeled as his "sequel" to "The Holocaust Industry"), but the three books above are a great start at the very least.
The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering
by Norman G. Finkelstein
https://www.amazon.com/Holocaust-Industry-Reflections-Exploitation-Suffering/dp/1781685614
> Being anti-Israel is totally fine, unless there's even a slightest wiff of, or connection to, anti-semitism, which there so often is.
Not my experience. Of the claims I have seen that particular criticisms of Israel are anti-semitic, I would say 8/10 are valid criticisms and are unfairly slandered on r/LabourUK as anti-semitism. Yes, 2/10 are a bit much, and indicate a bias against Jews. Even then I wouldn't call them anti-semitic. I would call them 'unbalanced'. Meanwhile outright anti-muslim comments like "Muslims are all criminals and rapists" are barely discussed.
In my opinion the anti-semitism label is definitely being used in a weaponised way to deflect criticism, as Norman Finkelstein documents in "Holocaust Industry" https://www.amazon.com/Holocaust-Industry-Reflections-Exploitation-Suffering/dp/1781685614. This happens on r/LabourUK quite a lot, and it is done very often by the moderators.
Profiting from the holocuast. This is a true holcaust industry.
https://www.amazon.com/Holocaust-Industry-Reflections-Exploitation-Suffering/dp/1781685614/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1483129182&sr=8-1&keywords=the+holocaust+industry
Still not seeing any facts adduced.
You gave me links to sites created by---
Give me their surnames.
(Forgive me for this request. But, to understand the credibility of any claim, we have to know who is making the claim.)
We don't want to lapse into the error of circular reasoning. That is to say, intelligent people aren't impressed by the zealot who says "I know the Bible is true because the Bible says so". Anymore than they're moved by "I know the Jews lost 6 million in World War II because the Jews said so."
So give me the surnames of the people running the websites you linked to.
Let us all learn more about these objective impartial fonts of truth you credulously promote. I'm just curious. Are these the same credible sources that have also "proven" that the Romans murdered four billion Jews at Bethar (as the Talmud says)?
I'm just going to leave this here: https://www.amazon.com/Holocaust-Industry-Reflections-Exploitation-Suffering/dp/1781685614/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3HB558T1F1URP&keywords=the+holocaust+industry+by+norman+finkelstein&qid=1570360846&sprefix=The+holocaust+industry%2Caps%2C203&sr=8-1
Some people claim it is more, and they too are persecuted. Anything that deviates from the "official government story" is considered blasphemy to these people, even if you think it was worse than they actually propose. An excellent book was written about this crowd by Norman Finkelstein (whose parents were in concentration camps).
https://www.amazon.com/Holocaust-Industry-Reflections-Exploitation-Suffering/dp/1781685614
It is indeed a complex situation, but these would be a good start:
Earlier history:
For more contextual books, I would recommend:
bad parallel. read norm finkelstein
Be very very careful going against Jewish interests. This is one of the most censored topics.
Stuff like Culture of Critique. Already taken down by Amazon. It had amazing reviews, and averaged around 4.5-5.0
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/03/12/amazon-bans-culture-of-critique-and-separation-and-its-discontents/
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/182136.The_Culture_of_Critique
"MIND BLOWN.
This should be required reading in school.
Exposes a fundamental issue in our society that most are completely unaware of.
Book is well referenced, and have fact checked many of the claims myself, which i've proven to be true."
Stuff by Ron Unz.
http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-racial-discrimination-at-harvard/
The book the Holocaust Industry
https://www.amazon.com/Holocaust-Industry-Reflections-Exploitation-Suffering/dp/1781685614/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?keywords=holocaust+industry+finkelstein
The book the Israel Lobby, written by two Harvard professors
https://www.amazon.com/Israel-Lobby-U-S-Foreign-Policy/dp/0374531501/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?keywords=the+israel+lobby
Nobel laureate Solzhenitsyn wrote a book about Jews in Russia, 100 Years Together, that few dare publish.
Roosh V, as a proponent of mens rights, questioned Jews and feminism, and promptly had books deplatformed from Amazon. He was banned from the UK. Books along the lines of Bang, Bang Ukraine, etc.
Check lectures by Michael E Jones. A Catholic that calls out "Jewish influence."
https://youtu.be/uYOcyDRcG1E
Check videos of Alex Jones talking about "globalists", which some say is a codeword for Jews.
If you really want to combat censorship try to find videos that Youtube is about to take down. People keep trying to get the truth out and censors keep taking it down. Look at videos listing 109 countries Jews were kicked out of, as an example.
https://youtu.be/6roAvG02gms
Try to guess the religion of the people usually taking these things down, and not giving people the chance to defend the truth of their work or statements.
https://www.adl.org/blog/pick-up-artist-roosh-v-moves-from-misogyny-to-anti-semitism
Remember, feminism is a Jewish movement:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Feminists_by_religion
...there's much more to say, if the censors don't get you first!
That interview makes it incredibly clear that Dershowitz is a lawyer above anything else - and as Finkelstein says, this is why lawyers have a bad reputation. The most damning part, I think, is the discussion of Dershowitz's two-order-of-magnitude error in the number of arabs who fled in 1947-48 (33:38). That's just plain poor scholarship, and it seems that Dershowitz's citation directly contradicts his claim. In response, Dershowitz dismisses this error because it weakens the evidence for his claim rather than strengthening it. But he still made a serious factual error in his book, which would be mortifying for any serious scholar. Yet the only thing he seems to care about is employing lawyerly rhetorical techniques to deflect and deny.
Apparently Dershowitz put up an intense campaign against Finkelstein's application for tenure at DePaul, seemingly in response to this controversy (see /u/e40's comment on this post for a link). That is shocking. Here is a fascinating discussion with Noam Chomsky concerning this debate. I didn't know much about this before, but it's just outrageous stuff. It makes me want to read Finkelstein's book more than anything else, actually. Looks pretty interesting.
EDIT: added links to e40's comment, Amazon
>behind every destructive revolution is based on literally two examples?
Well I just used the two worst of the 20th century. If thats not good enough we can go deeper.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsions_and_exoduses_of_Jews
http://www.eretzyisroel.org/~jkatz/expulsions.html
>The first in Russia (led by a non-Jew and the most Important Jew got an ice pick to the head) and one being
No, Lenin was a quarter Jewish. Trots and Marx also Jews.
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/was-lenin-jewish/
>an intellectual movement in literal Nazi Germany.
Frankfurt School was all Jewish, buddy. You clearly havent done the research on this.
https://www.bh.org.il/blog-items/frankfurt-school-jewish-intellectuals-made-60s/
>You have to establish a valid reason for them being hated
You want me to tell you why people hate Jews? Its been the same reasons for a thousand years. Are you really that out of the loop?
>The Schengen Area is a Jewish plot as well?
The Jewish influence on the recent open border policy of Europe is well documented. The most visible being George Soros and his Open Society.
>I didn't realize that free movement of Europeans that preexisted the refugee crisis by two decades was also made to allow Muslims to take over, despite it not effecting Non-EU states.
Who does the end of European nationalism benefit? It sure as hell doesnt benefit Christians or Europeans. This isnt rocket science.
>I'm still waiting for this thousands of years of evil Jewish plotting and not you simply pointing out modern ideas and policies you don't like and blaming Jews.
Oh you are actually willing to do some real reading into it? Sure I can help you there.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture_of_Critique_series
https://www.amazon.com/Jewish-Revolutionary-Spirit-Impact-History/dp/0929891074
https://www.amazon.com/Holocaust-Industry-Reflections-Exploitation-Suffering/dp/1781685614/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=the+holocaust+industry&qid=1558996929&s=books&sr=1-1
https://www.amazon.com/Holocaust-Industry-Reflections-Exploitation-Suffering/dp/1781685614