Reddit Reddit reviews The Problem of Pain

We found 39 Reddit comments about The Problem of Pain. Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Books
Christian Books & Bibles
Christian Living
Christian Death & Grief
The Problem of Pain
HarperOne
Check price on Amazon

39 Reddit comments about The Problem of Pain:

u/fajitachimichanga · 27 pointsr/videos

For an incredible counter-argument from someone exponentially smarter than I am, I recommend CS Lewis' book The Problem of Pain. Amazon link: http://www.amazon.com/The-Problem-Pain-C-Lewis/dp/0060652969

u/elbowbrunch · 26 pointsr/Christianity

The question you're asking yourself is God moral? And if God is not moral then why should I serve him?

>The existence of suffering in a world created by a good and almighty God — "the problem of pain" — is a fundamental theological dilemma and perhaps the most serious objection to the Christian religion.

I recommend this book it'll answer your questions far better than I can. When it comes down to it and this for every person in any religion. Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and Judaism.

>with fear and trembling your own salvation work out,


u/TronXD · 9 pointsr/reddit.com

In actual fact, I submitted it because the headline is absolutely jaw-dropping.

I assume you think I submitted it because I wanted to score a point against religion. But that's ridiculous, since philosophers deal with the Problem of Pain all the time - it's nothing new.

What I'm really perplexed by is the fact that you seem quite threatened by this, as if you really think it is a point against you. What are you afraid of? Terrible things happen by the Will of the Almighty God all the time, and it's never bothered you before.

On the other hand, billions of human beings believe your religion is the direct path to Hell, and God has struck down five innocent adherents via its ultimate symbol. Perhaps I can understand your concern.

u/prudecru · 7 pointsr/Catholicism

>I feel empty
>
>lack of God’s presence in my heart

Don't take this the wrong way, but feelings are irrelevant. Jesus asks you to assent to and accept the gospel and the beliefs of the Church; he doesn't ask you to feel anything. You don't need to emote anything to be saved.

Sometimes we go through spiritual deserts where we feel nothing and it seems - it seems - we pray into the void and labor in our duties under an empty sky. We still pray and do our duty.

>If the devil was responsible for my depression, then why didn’t an all-powerful God save me from it in my prayers?

This is a trial for you. The command to take up your cross is absolutely real. No one said it was going to be easy.

Regarding why God would do this to you, I would suggest reading The Problem of Pain by C.S. Lewis.

I would continue therapy. Continue to pray as you have. It's possible you may use medication temporarily or permanently. It's possible your life situation may change - I went through a phase like this at this age, and then later I got married and had children and it passed. But I stopped going to Mass at the time and it would have been better if I had continued.

Edited to add: I've been meaning to read this other book as well: The Catholic Guide to Depression by Aaron Kheriarty.

Read and pray some of the Psalms, such as Psalm 22: O my God, I cry by day, but thou dost not answer; and by night, but find no rest etc.

u/TrimetTribble · 5 pointsr/lotrmemes

Great post. If you think about it, those issues are all central to Christianity. Why does God allow shit to hit the fan? Why, if he's so powerful, did he send himself (in the form of Jesus) to essentially be a powerless Hobbit?
Heck, Lewis even has a book called The Problem of Pain.


u/tom-dickson · 5 pointsr/Catholicism

The Problem of Pain is a good book on it.

Many people (such as I) approach the problem intellectually; but it's not an intellectual argument (though it is one of only two objections Aquinas brings against the existence of God).

u/JJChowning · 5 pointsr/DebateReligion

I'm not sure where I land on this, but here are a few possibilities and resources I know of for looking into them a bit more in depth:

  1. A less literal take would be that the fall is not a historic event, but a description of the state of man [1],[2]. This opens up many questions as to why mankind, and the world before man, is "fallen".

  2. A more orthodox take would maintain that the fall is reflective of an event or events in early human history, and that the brokenness of the world is the result of this fall, a fallen world being a fitting home for a fallen humanity. How does this work with the fact that death, predation, and pain immensely predate humanity? I'm currently reading The End of Christianity which proposes that the effects of the fall were retroactively imposed. God in his foreknowledge created a world that would be the fitting home for a humanity that would fall.

  3. Some propose God allowed the devil to monkey with and pervert creation before man. I think C.S. Lewis presents this in The Problem of Pain, but I don't recall him being sold on it.

  4. Some propose that there is no answer from a human perspective. God created predation, pain and suffering, and as limited creatures we cannot understand why - you might get that theology from the book of Job.

  5. Some propose that God intentionally gives the creation over to un-ordered, indeterminate processes, and allows for the emergence of things like pain and suffering. This is somewhat like what is stated in Death Before the Fall.

    As I said i'm not sure what makes most sense. I think the problem of evil is the biggest intellectual difficulty for theism in general and Christianity in particular.
u/playhimoffcat · 4 pointsr/Christianity

A bit of warning and advice to all who might ask this same question: don't ask hard questions if you won't accept hard answers.

Also: this question has been raised and dealt with so many times -- I would recommend the many books on that that will a) give a better explanation than I can and b) raise a better objection that you can.

Start with this: http://www.amazon.com/Problem-Pain-C-S-Lewis/dp/0060652969

u/Angelusvero · 4 pointsr/Christianity

you're too quick to assume suffering is evil, and i'm not saying inflicting suffering on another is a good thing either hahaha. for a better answer, look into this http://www.amazon.com/Problem-Pain-C-S-Lewis/dp/0060652969/ref=cm_lmf_tit_5. And i think you should consider perspective as well. If the world were more perfect less dramatic things would seem worse. Sorta like ying and yang without darkness one could not understand light

u/Bakeshot · 4 pointsr/Christianity

Thousands of innocent, young people die daily.

This is something Christians have to reconcile with their belief in God's sovereignty and holiness. Period. Otherwise, the worldview unravels and is certainly a belief worth losing.

I would recommend reading C.S. Lewis's The Problem of Pain in this time of mourning if you're looking for a Christian perspective on where we see God in times of confusing tragedy.

u/ceramic_pillow · 3 pointsr/Catholicism

Alrightyyyyyyy. Let's get to it. By no means take my word to be truth, but I will try to answer your questions to the best of my ability. If anyone sees where I've messed up, call me out on it.
First off, I am incredibly glad to see your enthusiasm! As someone only slightly older than you, it really makes me happy to see someone even slightly interested in the Faith.

  1. Church teaching on homosexuality is also something I struggle with. The CCC shows us through [ccc 2357-2359] that we are called to respect and love homosexuals just like any other person. That does not mean we should condone them living in sin or turning away from God's teachings. Here is an interesting article about homosexuals living a chaste, religious life. Ultimately, the writer concludes that he is happy with the grace God has given him and has learned to live the Church's teaching on homosexuality despite his own desires.

  2. From my understanding, the Church has not made any official statement on belief in evolution. As far as I can tell, it comes down to your own personal beliefs. Now as to why God would allow so much pain to happen through creation is beyond me. You may want to check out "The Problem of Pain" by C.S. Lewis. [ccc 403] indicates that our human suffering comes from Adam's pride leading to Original Sin. By turning our back to God, we destined ourselves to a life of misery. Perhaps through this mechanism, natural selection has caused so much pain...? Grasping at straws here.

  3. Though I think the view of how people go to Hell is pleasant, I do not believe it meshes with Catholic teaching. [ccc 1021] shows us that Man is judged by his acts while alive. Not his post-mortem decisions. And Hell is not what modern-culture tells us. It is not Satan's kingdom where he rules with impunity and punishes the wicked. He too is punished there. Hell's pain is caused by an absence of God's love, not punishment by demons. When those in Hell chose to turn their backs to God's teachings, they chose to alienate themselves from God's love. Dante's description of Hell is allegorical and by no means Church Cannon.

    I hope I have helped even slightly with your questions and hopefully other users will be able to offer a different insight into this for you. Feel free to ask any questions. Best of luck!
u/FA1R_ENOUGH · 3 pointsr/Christianity
  1. This is known as the Problem of Evil. If you'd like to see discussion on this topic, please check out our . The attempt to answer this question is known as theodicy. There are two major theodicies that I'll briefly summarize, but in order to fully grasp the weight of these ideas, you're going to have to consult a lot of philosophical material. There's a reason why people can take many classes just on this problem. The first defense is called the Free Will Defense. In a nutshell, it says that God created creatures with free will - the ability to choose good or to choose evil. Unfortunately, some free creatures made poor decisions, and evil came into our world. The presence of this freely chosen evil is the reason for the pain and suffering we see today. Augustine is credited with one of the earliest formulations of this defense. Alvin Plantinga has published a more recent free will defense which very many people believe has refuted the Problem of Evil. The second theodicy is called the soul-making theodicy. Essentially, it says that God has a morally justified reason for allowing evil, and it is to create mature beings. Although this is obviously not a perfect world, it may be the best way to a perfect world. This theodicy asserts that evil allows for mature, perfected beings, and that without evil, people could not have been optimally perfect. John Hick is well-known for this theodicy.

  2. I don't see why that would be the case. However, I am unconvinced of a Young Earth. If you meant to imply YEC, then I'm the wrong person to talk to.

  3. This is the Problem of Hell. Again, many good discussions on this topic will be found in the FAQ. Personally, I do not believe that someone will find themselves in Hell because they believed wrongly. Salvation is not dependent upon a theology exam! I think that those in Hell have actively rejected God's grace and forgiveness. C. S. Lewis presents a compelling view of Hell in a chapter in The Problem of Pain. He says that Hell is a special prison where the lock and key are on the inside of the cell. Those in Hell will not allow themselves to be forgiven. The Great Divorce also gives an interesting look into what the heart of someone in Hell is like. All that being said, I firmly believe that salvation is found in Jesus Christ alone. It is the rejection of God, who is the source of what is good, that causes a person to damn himself.

  4. This is a restatement of the Problem of Evil, which I discussed above.
u/e_t_ · 3 pointsr/Christianity

Lots of people have asked this question. It's a subset of the problem of evil.

For a specifically Christian answer (not necessarily the answer), check out C.S. Lewis' The Problem of Pain.

u/learnmathq · 3 pointsr/facepalm

If you're interested in this topic, you should read CS Lewis's "The Problem of Pain."

u/thesouthpaw · 3 pointsr/Christianity

Jesus Among Other Gods

and

Problem of Pain

are two that come to my mind. I think both are great reads for non-believers who were raised Christian or have a solid understanding of Christianity.

u/ofd1197 · 2 pointsr/ems

Don't be "desensitized." You have to develop a thick skin but keep a soft heart. I know that sounds like a paradox, and it's the hardest thing to do in this field. You will see unimaginable human suffering, but you are there to help when others can not. There is a book by C.S. Lewis called "The Problem of Pain." It's not really an EMS book...but it helped me a little. Here's a link for it on amazon http://www.amazon.com/books/dp/0060652969

u/oxygencube · 2 pointsr/Christianity

I have wrestled with anxiety and panic attacks for 10+ years. My faith has helped me so much. Anxiety and fear can often point us to things that we idolize or elevate above God. I too had horrible withdrawls and will never go back to meds. Writing in a journal really helps, especially when things are going well. It's important to remember that God always brings you through to the other side.

I have three books to suggest:

Running Scared: Fear, Worry, and the God of Rest
http://www.amazon.com/Running-Scared-Fear-Worry-Rest/dp/0978556755

The Anxiety Cure
http://www.amazon.com/Anxiety-Cure-Archibald-Hart/dp/0849942969/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1449213728&sr=1-1&keywords=anxiety+cure

The Problem of Pain
http://www.amazon.com/Problem-Pain-C-S-Lewis/dp/0060652969/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1449213760&sr=1-1&keywords=c.s.+lewis+problem+of+pain

All the best.

u/UnitedMethodistMan · 2 pointsr/DebateAChristian

>Unnecessary suffering, and some of it is absolutely horrific.

Here is a book written by a far smarter guy than me about the Problem with Pain and Suffering. http://www.amazon.com/The-Problem-Pain-C-Lewis/dp/0060652969

> I don't want to suffer, but that choice is taken out of my hands. I don't want to go to hell, but the only criteria I have to make that determination is ridiculous old stories from various religions and denominations. That is God's fault.

You have a choice in how you deal with every situation. Things happen to us that are out of our control, which is an aspect of a free world. Just because you didn't choose for something to happen doesn't mean you have a choice in how you react to it, for good or for ill. You don't want to go to hell, but you have the choice to either believe that hell is real or it isn't, and to live your life accordingly. You might be totally right, or you could be terribly wrong. But you have the choice to decide if it's real or not.

>You missed my point. Or, more precisely, the rest of that paragraph. "The child has a choice! At some predetermined date that is unknown to the child, if the child has not decided to worship the parent beating him, then the child will be beaten without mercy until the end of time. All the child has to do is truly love the parent..."

Sorry for not addressing this. While it is the popular belief of many Christians that hell is a place of eternal suffering, well, read this and see that some doctrine's have been kind of made up on the subject.

http://www.godsplanforall.com/mistranslationstomeanhell

>YES. That is exactly what it means. Parents are responsible for keeping their children out of harm's way, and they do everything possible to keep their child safe while allowing their child to learn how to operate in the reality that he lives in. Unlike parents, however, God isn't stuck in our reality, with extremely limited means to teach young people how to not hurt themselves.

You are saying that a parent should hover over their child constantly, 24/7, right over their shoulder, to make sure that no harm comes to them? Do you have kids? To do something like that would be smothering them! It wouldn't allow them to grow, and if you were there to punish them every single time they did something wrong, they would resent you. Eventually you need to let your kids make their own decisions. If the child was 12 and he was running through the house, is it still the parents fault? That child knows better by that point.

> So I cannot believe in God. So if God did have a presence in this world, and I still didn't believe in him, should I be tortured forever? And if I fought against that injustice, would you think that I was wrong to do so?

If I believed that God would torture you forever if you didn't believe him, then yes you wouldn't be wrong to fight against that. However, like the article above, I don't think God sends people to Hell forever. That was a question I struggled with when my friend (who was a non-believer), was killed in an accident. I just don't see how a just God could send someone to hell for eternity for a finite lifetime of actions, especially one cut so short.

u/JorusC · 1 pointr/worldnews

Dude, why anything? Have you considered that God knows something you don't, and that your extremely limited grasp of the situation has not considered whole slew of factors that, on the eternal time scale, take major precedence?

You're asking about the nature of evil. It's a hard question. I think C.S. Lewis wrote some good stuff on it in The Problem of Pain. Seriously, I couldn't come close to explaining it as well as he does. Here's a Youtube reading, but it's 4 hours.

u/theluppijackal · 1 pointr/Christianity

http://smile.amazon.com/Problem-Pain-C-S-Lewis/dp/0060652969/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1427661998&sr=8-1&keywords=the+problem+of+pain

“Try to exclude the possibility of suffering which the order of nature and the existence of free-wills involve, and you find that you have excluded life itself”
― C.S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain

u/pottsnpans · 1 pointr/Catholicism

I strongly recommend The Problem of Pain by C.S. Lewis: http://www.amazon.com/Problem-Pain-C-S-Lewis/dp/0060652969/

I just finished it recently and it helped my understanding of these questions immensely. I'm not a theologian, but as far as I could tell it was pretty much in line with the teachings of the Church. I would be interested in hearing if I am wrong about that.

u/rabidmonkey1 · 1 pointr/Christianity

The idea, I believe, with execution, is that a person's crimes are too great and therefore must be sent to God for immediate judgment. I don't endorse this philosophy, especially given past abuse on those who clearly didn't deserve death - think victims of war.

The larger idea that you're tackling here is pain; the existence of pain in the world. Why would a loving God allow pain to exist?

Please read C.S. Lewis's (He was an Atheist at one point too, you know!) The Problem of Pain. He explains and addresses all this in much greater depth and with much greater skill than I could at the moment.

http://www.amazon.com/Problem-Pain-C-S-Lewis/dp/0060652969/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1256693843&sr=8-1

u/brznks · 1 pointr/atheism

hahah now you've got to be trolling me. You haven't listened to a word I've written, and you keep repeating the same exact things I provide you with good arguments against. If this is an honest effort at debating, you are awful at it. You have to realize when a point I make defeats a point you made, so you either have to abandon it or defend it. But you cannot simply repeat it and have that be a legitimate argument. In case you're not trolling, here are some responses.

> No it doesn't [have a unified theology]. Nothing based on the bible can.

That is ridiculous. I could come up with a theology. If millions of people agreed with me, we would have a unified theology. To say that having a unified theology is impossible does not make any sense.

> Is it the word of god or not?

Christians believe the Bible was written by humans. Many believe it was "inspired" by God, but not so far as dictation. It's a more abstract "inspiring" like how love can "inspire" a love poem.

> You said that but clearly you lack the ability to perceive reality or you are mentally insane. You are not in union with god on earth. You are separated from god while you are on earth.

You seem utterly incapable of philosophical thought. Either that or you're just not reading what I'm writing. Let me lay it out for you:

  • Heaven: complete union with God
  • Hell: complete separation from God
  • Earth: Some interaction with God. Not complete union, not complete separation.

    People cannot interact with God via prayer when in hell because they are completely separated from God.

    > So he is 100% responsible for all the good things (things you approve of) and bears no responsibility at all for any bad thing.

    This is, to your credit, the one good theological question you bring up. It is a difficult question with many answers over the years (from Augustine to C.S. Lewis). One answer is that like darkness is simply the absence of light, evil is simply the absence of goodness. By that mechanism, God could provide the goodness without providing any evil. Another answer is that all evil in the world arises from free will, and that if no one chose evil there would be no evil, only good. This answer tends to rely on true evil being "second-order," such as hatred and malice, not "first-order," like physical pain. In any case, if you want to give this topic any more than a cursory consideration, I suggest you read the linked books above.

    > You don't know and you don't care because you don't ask the question.

    And now you go back to being obtuse. I do care, and I asked the question in my very comment. I even ventured a guess at an answer! (That our lives are happier and more meaningful as mortals.)

    > You said there had to be consequences for choosing wrong or it made no sense to have free will. Now you are saying there are no consequences to choosing wrong because you can sin and still go to heaven. So much for your complete and unified catholic theology.

    And, here you go back to seeing things in black-and-white when they are grey, just like with the separation from God issue. Let me break it down for you again:

  • Person never sins (does not happen): Go to heaven
  • Person commits horrendous sins and completely rejects God in full knowledge of what God is: Probably go to hell
  • Person has some moderate sins, and/or does not fully believe in God: Depends on the severity, but they could probably go to purgatory and then to heaven.

    > Not any more. The catholic church has changed their minds about purgatory.

    Factually, verifiably false. You're probably thinking of limbo. See sections 1031, 1472, and 1475 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

    > No they don't. God chooses to send them to hell because they do things god does not approve of.

    Here is where you completely ignore what I said (that people choose hell, and the existence of a hell is a necessary consequence of free will) and simply repeat your claim. Not an effective tactic.

    > How? They made the wrong choice, they exercised their free will in a way god does not approve of. There has to be a consequence for doing something god does not approve of and that consequence is hell.

    See section on what happens to people with different levels of sins.

    > That's the most evil thing I can think of. What a repugnant religion catholicism is.

    You provide absolutely no argument for why what I described is "evil" or "repugnant." Name-calling, too, makes for an ineffective argument.

    I didn't want this to escalate to where I had to be a dick about it, but you pretty much asked for it.
u/abeachsomewhere1 · 1 pointr/worldnews

While not an easy question to respond in a good way to a child, the answer is very well explained in important Christian books such as:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Problem-Pain-C-Lewis/dp/0060652969

“Try to exclude the possibility of suffering which the order of nature and the existence of free-wills involve, and you find that you have excluded life itself”
― C.S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain

“His Omnipotence means power to do all that is intrinsically possible, not to do the intrinsically impossible. You may attribute miracles to Him, but not nonsense. There is no limit to His power.

If you choose to say, 'God can give a creature free will and at the same time withhold free will from it,' you have not succeeded in saying anything about God: meaningless combinations of words do not suddenly acquire meaning simply because we prifex to them the two other words, 'God can.'

It remains true that all things are possible with God: the intrinsic impossibilities are not things but nonentities. It is no more possible for God than for the weakest of His creatures to carry out both of two mutually exclusive alternatives; not because His power meets an obstacle, but because nonsense remains nonsense even when we talk it about God.”
― C.S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain


u/kumachaaan · 1 pointr/Christianity
u/[deleted] · 1 pointr/philosophy

If you want to believe in what's true why don't you start with something small and then work your way up to the bigger things. For example, you still won't admit that the Kalam Cosmological argument has 5 premises in total.

What in the world makes you think you'll ever believe in God if you can't even believe the basic foundation of an argument for Gods existence?

As far as pain and suffering goes, nobody likes pain and suffering. Mankind does not have the perfect answer to that question because we are totally and completely limited in cognitive ability to understand why a being so powerful as God would allow such things to exist.

My question to you is, how much research have you done on that topic? How many books have you read that describe possible reasons for allowing pain and suffering in the world?

You can't expect me to tackle that question and do it justice in a Reddit post, but I can give you the tools to help you understand. Start by reading The Problem of Pain and I would also suggest you read [Is God a Moral Monster] (https://www.amazon.com/God-Moral-Monster-Making-Testament/dp/0801072751/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_14_t_0?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=9XYFJT9F9QNCACS1G48Z).

It's going to take a lot of time and effort to read up on these issues and you won't get a simple answer to that question in a simple Reddit post. The onus is on you to do the proper research because humans have been thinking about this problem and writing books about it for hundreds of years.

The Kalam Cosmological Argument IS evidence for the existence of God.

u/umpteenth_ · 1 pointr/askgaybros

>I can NOT stop believing in God and yet I can't see how I can worship Him with the evil in this world.

This is an age-old question. It's called "the problem of evil." And the attempt to resolve this question has a name, too: theodicy. C. S. Lewis wrote a book on the subject, called "The Problem of Pain." I haven't read it yet, but it's in my "To read" list. The most common rebuttal to the question of how a loving God can allow all the evil in the world is the concept of free will. I cannot do a good job of explaining it thoroughly, but one of the clearest explanations was in an evangelical magazine I once read. I think there's an online copy, but I'll have to find it.

I don't consider myself Christian anymore, but I still turn to the Bible for comfort. How I personally get through trying times is by remembering Romans 8:28, "And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose." Even when I might not see how at the moment, I choose to believe that I will be able to look back and make sense of any present suffering. That does not make it any less difficult, though.

u/RyanTDaniels · 1 pointr/Christianity

C.S. Lewis deals with this in The Problem of Pain.

u/debatemethrowaway · 1 pointr/DebateAChristian

A very good response to God allowing suffering to occur can be found in The Problem of Pain by C.S. Lewis. I suggest reading the book in its entirety, but this is a pretty good summary of the book. It is a compelling read and gives an answer to this question.

u/fessus_intellectiva · 1 pointr/Christianity

Have you read The Problem of Pain by C.S.Lewis? He tackles that issue pretty well regarding evil in the world. Not trying to push anything on you, I'm just saying - he's a smart guy and it's a good read. As for how could God reach out to you if you don't worship Him: haven't you ever loved someone who didn't love you back? I have; Megan Fox still won't return any of my phone calls or emails. And yes, there are some really oblivious Christians out there. Sorry about them; there's not much I can do. However, there are some others out there that understand the evil in the world far better that you and me. Did you know there are more Christian martyrs in the world now then there were when the Romans were feeding them to the lions?

u/rickiibeta · 1 pointr/atheism

sorry, i am a busy man. i am not forgetting to respond... this question is raised and answered in the book The Problem of Pain by C.S. Lewis... the punchline is:

>"His omnipotence means power to do all that is intrinsically possible, not to do the intrinsically impossible."

i.e. creating a free creature without the possibility of evil is nonsense just as 'can god build a rock so heavy not even he can lift'.

>"Meaningless combinations of words do not suddenly acquire meaning simply because we prefix to them he two words 'God can'"

both quotes are taken from chapter 2: Divine Omnipotence; page 18. i suggest reading the entire book (especially the chess game metaphor on page 25 near the end of the same chapter), or at least chapter two which concerns your current rationale. or, you could not read it and go along presenting this evidence as proof God does not exist and be as dogmatic as many the religious folks you talk rotten about.

u/whichpaul · 1 pointr/Reformed

Very sorry to hear this, honestly can't imagine.

C.S. Lewis wrote an excellent book called, "The Problem of Pain", I believe he wrote it after losing his wife to cancer or something.
https://www.amazon.com/Problem-Pain-C-S-Lewis/dp/0060652969

Also here's some verses that spring to mind:

"... for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith" Romans 3:23-25

God does not take revenge on those who have faith in his redemptive act.

"Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies and God of all comfort, who comforts us in all our affliction, so that we may be able to comfort those who are in any affliction, with the comfort with which we ourselves are comforted by God. For as we share abundantly in Christ's sufferings, so through Christ we share abundantly in comfort too. If we are afflicted, it is for your comfort and salvation; and if we are comforted, it is for your comfort, which you experience when you patiently endure the same sufferings that we suffer. Our hope for you is unshaken, for we know that as you share in our sufferings, you will also share in our comfort." 2 Corinthians 1:3-7

This life is filled suffering but God can both comfort us and uses any suffering for our good, that of others and his glory, as he has already suffered as fully human for us and promises us an eternal cure for suffering and sin; as challenging as it might seem right now.

u/northstardim · 1 pointr/Christianity

So what are your goals? Do you insist on being like everybody else?? That aint going to happen sorry.

Do you get frustrated by the condition and project that onto other people? (Attitude)

Are you completely cynical about life and doubt everybody's honesty? (attitude)

Do you take so many medications that you're numb to everything? (Attitude)

There is a range of choices even you have towards life, whether or not you believe it.

In my own life I deal with neuropathy in my feet and hands. It is so variable and haphazard it is hard to know ahead of time whether I can walk due to this pain, whether I can open a jar or tune in my radio. It varies in intensity from barely there to incredibly hard to deal with from moment to moment.

I cant know your pain because I am not you, but everyone has their own burdens, in your case it insulates you from so much of life which is far more complex than physical pain. I can also guess it also closes your world down to some small place like a bedroom.

If you can read a Bible go back to the book of Job and reread what happens to him and his reaction to it. Compare the other characters reaction to Job's problems

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job+1&version=KJV

Might also want to read CS Lewis book "The problem of Pain"

https://www.amazon.com/Problem-Pain-C-S-Lewis/dp/0060652969

You mention "privilege" yes of course I am privileged I know and love God and I am confident that there will be a better place for me after death. Because God promised me this. Because of this I can do whatever I can do, and don't worry about the stuff I cant do.

In your case there are people who you interact with daily, are you good to them? Do you even know them and their lives, their wants, their dreams? Because of your condition you are in a unique position to share with them. yes there is some responsibility (probably not a huge one) you have towards them. No amount of pain on your part will eliminate that responsibility. If nothing else you can show them how they too can deal with their own pain when it comes and we all have pain. You CAN be a blessing to everyone around you by choosing that right attitude.

u/MojoPin83 · 1 pointr/Christianity

The Problem of Suffering and the Goodness of God - Ravi Zacharias at Johns Hopkins: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7-gP1gC8gM&app=desktop

Why Series | Why Suffering: Suffering and Jesus | Nabeel Qureshi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psrvQZj68h4&app=desktop

Nabeel Qureshi on Suffering, Death, and the Cross: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tv3KruwUDWk&app=desktop

Dr Nabeel Qureshi's Response to a Lady Suffering With Multiple Sclerosis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-Q2VJnHIFE&app=desktop

Rethinking Life After Death (NT Wright): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZC6tbgpsl4&app=desktop

C.S. Lewis on Heaven and the New Earth: God's Eternal Remedy to the Problem of Evil and Suffering: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gs5VzPK8rw0&app=desktop

C.S. Lewis - The Problem of Pain: https://www.amazon.ca/Problem-Pain-C-S-Lewis/dp/0060652969

Why Suffering?: Finding Meaning and Comfort When Life Doesn't Make Sense by Ravi Zacharias and Vince Vitale: https://www.amazon.com/Why-Suffering-Finding-Meaning-Comfort/dp/145554969X

Heaven by Randy Alcorn: https://www.amazon.com/Heaven-Randy-Alcorn/dp/0842379428/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2KI1OVDBGB8J6&keywords=randy+alcorn+heaven+book&qid=1566624191&s=books&sprefix=Randy+Alcorn+heaven%2Cstripbooks-intl-ship%2C150&sr=1-1

u/mothball187 · 0 pointsr/Christianity

It's probably not your only reason, but you mentioned that you cannot worship a god that would allow so much atrocity and chaos. It would be worth your time to really explore your doubts even if only at first for your immediate goal of trying to understand her faith, and ultimately for your own sake. The Problem of Pain and The Reason for God are both books I have read and enjoyed that address those issues and more. Best wishes to you both.

u/TheDannyDevito · 0 pointsr/DebateReligion

Well, I don't see much value and debating you, seeing as you are an anti-theist, a group I've found far to euphoric to convince of anything; I will, however, point you to CS Lewis' 'The Problem of Pain'. An exceptional book by an exceptional man.