Reddit reviews The Vaccine-Friendly Plan: Dr. Paul's Safe and Effective Approach to Immunity and Health-from Pregnancy Through Your Child's Teen Years

If you want to learn more about a good, safe vaccination schedule, I highly recommend Dr Paul Thomas's book The Vaccine-Friendly Plan

It's a lighter, more spaced out schedule than the CDC one.

There's also a 9 page pdf with a summary of the plan.

I think there are books out there about how to navigate the vaccine system with these concerns in mind.

here is one

Surprisingly Bill Maher hosted pediatrician Dr. Jay Gordon on to discuss the topic recently without berating the man as an "anti-vaxxer". The fact that people can't even handle hearing simple questions about the overall safety of vaccines in an effort to improve them is astounding not even when its a pediatrician who administers vaccines himself is asking. https://www.facebook.com/melissafloyd11/videos/10218864123367286/

Dr. Paul Thomas's personal study with his alternative/slower vaccine schedule appears to have resulted in a decreased risk in some of these associated complications which would make sense if immune responses to metal adjuvants within a small time frame are the primary culprit. https://www.drpaulapproved.com/uploads/6/4/8/3/64831775/dr_paul_approved_vaccine_plan.pdf https://smile.amazon.com/dp/1101884231/

I've talked to some pediatricians and read some books from pediatricians. Those would be the doctors I would trust on the subject since they are the ones that have the imperative duty to ensure that what they are doing is safe. I've found nurses and doctors outside of the Pediatric field are usually ignorant on the subject yet confidently speak on diatribes they, themselves, have not researched. Even in the pediatric field, Doctors are simply doing what they're told based on CDC's recommendations and can only discuss brochure level subjects. They work 12 hours a day - they aren't researching vaccines, especially with so much support from the anti-anti-vaxxer movement. They don't have to defend their regimen.

After reading The Vaccine-Friendly Plan, it's all pretty clear to me. I'd suggest you and your parents read it to gain some perspective.

I read the book and was planning on doing a spaced out vaccine schedule still within the CDC guidelines. There are no drawbacks to this healthwise. Our 1st Pediatrician said they he was against it and to not listen to the Jenny McCarthy's of the world. He also did not know why people had an issue with vaccines or why they wanted to space them out.

So here we have the largest network of Pediatricians in a capital city, who have a vaccine policy STRICTER than the CDC. This Dr was one of the main proponents of the policy affecting 10's of thousands of babies. Not only did he now know about the contents of the vaccines, he didn't even know WHY people have an issue with them.

Luckily my next pediatrician was much more open minded and reasonable. He was very honest saying he got his 3 children vaccinated on the schedule but has had patients that showed distinct changes after them, developing autism. He said "Was it the vaccines? No way to really know..." and went on to support our decision with spacing them out, guilt-free.

good to know, best of luck to you and your daughter.

if i could do it over for my son, i'd completely skip the hepatitis B series until just before he becomes sexually active (currently halting all additional doses for him). that one in particular coincides with the initial skyrocketing of autism cases in the 1980s. the earlier the immune system is activated via aluminum adjuvant vaccines = the higher the chance of neuro damage later on. though, if the mother has hepB herself, then of course you'd want to administer the hepB immunoglobulin right after birth to prevent hepB.

also skipping the MMR for sure, and will probably avoid PCV13 as well. again, please do your own research and weigh risk vs benefits.

will point you to one more resource i believe every parent/prospective parent should read, which include several sections on the importance of a heavily delayed vaccine schedule:

https://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Friendly-Plan-Effective-Health-Pregnancy/dp/1101884231/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8

and if you don't want to purchase it, then at least see this review comment about appendix E (i purchased it, can confirm it's there)

https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/REUQXW216AKF0/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_viewpnt?ie=UTF8&ASIN=1101884231#REUQXW216AKF0

text:

The Appendix E of this book really tells you all you need to know:
A team of researchers have been reviewing and tabulating the health outcomes 2,230 children over age two and under age seven who were patients at my clinic, Integrative Pediatrics, from June 2008 (which is when my clinic first opened) to February 2015. We are in the process of compiling this data for a retrospective study approved by Western Institutional Review Board. We are examining incidence of autism, developmental delays, hospitalization a, infectious diseases, and sick visits. The following data is preliminary but serves to answer one key question: Does Dr Paul's Vaccine-Friendly Plan help reduce the incidence of autism?

Patients were divided into three groups as follows:

Group 1: Following Dr Paul's Vaccine-Friendly Plan:
These children were either born into my practice of established care by the two month well baby visit. They did not get the birth or the infant hepatitis B vaccine. If they got the hepatitis A vaccine, it was after age two. If they got the MMR and the chicken pox vaccines, it was at or after age three.
There were 1,098 children in Group 1.

Group 2: Unvaccinated: Because of parental choice, these children had no vaccines.
There were 238 children in Group 2.

Group 3: Other/Most Vaccinated: Though there was some individual variability, many children in Group 3 were vaccinated according to CDC guidelines. There were 894 children in Group 3.




Group | Total infants/toddlers | Autism cases-ASD rate
---------|----------|----------
1 | 1,098 | 0 - 0%
2 | 238| 0 - 0%
3| 894| 15 - 1/60


Using the previous CDC autism rate of one in fifty, we would have expected approximately twenty-two cases of autism in Group 1, but there were no autism or ASD (autism spectrum disorder) diagnoses.

We would have expected to have approximately four cases of autism in Group 2, but there were no autism or ASD diagnoses.

We would have expected to have approximately seventeen cases of autism in Group 3, and there are fifteen autism/ASD diagnoses, which mirrors the national average. This data demonstrates with a high level of statistical significance that the Vaccine-Friendly Plan - as well as not vaccinating at all - was associated with less autism/ASD.

edit:

and also highly suggest you follow this twitter account.

https://twitter.com/NVICLoeDown

the founder of NVIC, barbara loe fisher, has a vaccine injured child herself, and she's been at the forefront of vaccine safety legislation for decades.


>lastly, towards the end of this debate it started to get personal, when the focus switches from an informative healthy debate to personal attacks it starts to lose credibility, not saying this is whats happened above but the last comment seemed like the conversation can only head in that direction. differences of opinion does not automatically make you enemies no matter what society has programmed us to think.

i have no patience for liars/deniers and parrots of the CDC (referring to another poster, not you). how many tens of millions worldwide now have neuro damage and/or autism because of these types of liars? even the cdc found causation back in 1999, even had to call an emergency meeting in 2000 (simpsonwood georgia) to the bewilderment of all scientists in attendance, then eventually chose to cover it all up by including fraudulent data sets from the opposite side of the country that reduced CDC's statistical significant findings (https://www.safeminds.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Weldon-letter-to-Gerberding10-31-03.pdf)

and of course there's the recent cdc whistleblower from 2014, dr. william thompson, stating there's a massive ongoing coverup of a previous MMR->autism study.

so, fuck being "nice".