It is also the belief that non-Jews are inferior and should be ethnically cleansed from that alleged and made-up "homeland" that was supposedly a "Land without People" but which actually had a lot of people who just happened to be brown skinned.
FYI Zionism was based on the same 'blood and soil' ethno-nationalist supremacist views that led to Nazism
>Abraham, the Jewish patriarch, probably never existed. Nor did Moses. The entire Exodus story as recounted in the Bible probably never occurred. The same is true of the tumbling of the walls of Jericho. And David, far from being the fearless king who built Jerusalem into a mighty capital, was more likely a provincial leader whose reputation was later magnified to provide a rallying point for a fledgling nation.
These are all manufactured identities not actual, historical ones.
And there's no huge difference. "Invaders" FYI are a common theme in European history. Pretty much everyone invaded everyone else. The Huns and Goths for example also invaded Europe and just as with Muslims they too have left their influence there, they are not a separate "world"
> It is also the belief that non-Jews are inferior and should be ethnically cleansed from that alleged and made-up "homeland" that was supposedly a "Land without People" but which actually had a lot of people who just happened to be brown skinned.
Hertzl said nothing about that.
I don't believe that either.
There can be a Palestinian state but Israel must also be allowed to exist.
> FYI Zionism was based on the same 'blood and soil' ethno-nationalist supremacist views that led to Nazism
Incorrect. Hertzl was prompted to the idea of Israel by the Dreyfus Affair in France.
> Abraham, the Jewish patriarch, probably never existed. Nor did Moses. The entire Exodus story as recounted in the Bible probably never occurred. The same is true of the tumbling of the walls of Jericho. And David, far from being the fearless king who built Jerusalem into a mighty capital, was more likely a provincial leader whose reputation was later magnified to provide a rallying point for a fledgling nation.
Even if that is true, it's still the only place on Earth associated with the Jews for their whole history. Some worldviews find that inconvenient, but that is not my problem.
Israel isn't going anywhere. They won't stop and neither will I.
First of all, the jews of the Levant and the Palestinians are genetically the same -- of course the geneticists who pointed this out was attacked and it was demanded that the article he wrote be physically torn out of all the copies of the scientific journal in all the libraries in the world, because it contradicts one of the founding myths of Israel: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/nov/25/medicalscience.genetics
Furthermore, even the rabbis are facing some facts:
>Abraham, the Jewish patriarch, probably never existed. Nor did Moses. The entire Exodus story as recounted in the Bible probably never occurred. The same is true of the tumbling of the walls of Jericho. And David, far from being the fearless king who built Jerusalem into a mighty capital, was more likely a provincial leader whose reputation was later magnified to provide a rallying point for a fledgling nation. http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/09/books/new-torah-for-modern-minds.html?pagewanted=all
In fact the Zionist idea of a "Jewish People" was recently manufactured:
>convert otherwise you'll have a hard time, which means pay extra taxes
Again complete and utter crapola
The Jews under Islam fared quite well and in fact there was a renaissance of Jewish culture, a "Golden Age", under Moslem rule. In the Crusades, they sides with the Moslem forces against the Christians who had massacred them etc etc
Furthermore to the extent that were taxed, it was because they were excluded from the greater tax (20%) that the Moslems had to pay. In fact the Moslem rulers did NOT encourage conversion because Jews could travel freely to the Western countries as merchants, where the Christian church relegated them to money changers.
All this is just BULLSHIT hatemongering that has been cooked up
Modern Israel has NOTHING to do with ancient Levant, no matter how hard the Zionist try to spin it that way.
And nothing that happened 2000 years ago give some guy from Brooklyn or Ukraine the right to come over and take the lands of some guy in Palestine anyway
> there is no concept of these nations beyond belonging to whatever ruling clan or tribe
And that is very much a description of Israel.
>Your phrase "manufactured state" is curious. What could it mean?
It means a nation built on an artificially constructed sense of national identity such as that which the Zionists created in order to manufacture "Israel":
Are you claiming that Judaism arose spontaneously, out of thin air? Perhaps the Hebrews just sprang out of the ground somewhere? Are you arguing that Judaism is the first, or earliest religion? That it has no historical antecedent whatsoever? That monotheism was not, in fact, predated by polytheism? Have you conducted any research to support these claims?
The segments in my post are well-cited. Perhaps you'd like to refute the authors of the research? By all means, look up the citations and compose angry, emotionally-based retorts to this historical and archaeological research.
Educate thyself. The following works are by Israeli authors:
Authors: Israel Finkelstein, Professor of Archaeology at Tel Aviv University, and Neil Asher Silberman, an archaeologist, historian and contributing editor to Archaeology Magazine.
It is a scholarly and truly monumental work, deeply profound and, of course, controversial. (Alan Hart, British Journalist and covert diplomat in Middle East, ITN's News at 10, BBC's Panorama)
I see, so you're promoting the myth that Jews have superior rights to land by virtue of being Jewish.
You think being Jewish gives you some sort of genetic right to other people's lands? So some guy in Brooklyn or Ukraine has superior rights than a Palestinian by virtue of claiming descendance from the ancient Jews of 2000 years ago? Or that "Jews" are in fact some sort of exclusive category of people rather than just another religion followed by people who intermixed with lots of other people?
FYI the idea of a "Jewish nation" is relatively modern
Even if the Bible were taken literally, the ancient Jews were the dominant force in the Levant for about 800 years, and there's no reason to take the Bible literally
>Abraham, the Jewish patriarch, probably never existed. Nor did Moses. The entire Exodus story as recounted in the Bible probably never occurred. The same is true of the tumbling of the walls of Jericho. And David, far from being the fearless king who built Jerusalem into a mighty capital, was more likely a provincial leader whose reputation was later magnified to provide a rallying point for a fledgling nation. https://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/09/books/new-torah-for-modern-minds.html
Nonsense, and nobody said facts matter less than feelings. It is a FACT that Palestnians have been ethnically-cleansed by Israel. Note that not ONE jew is sent to refugee camps, only Palestinians are, and not ONE Palestinian is granted an automatic "Right of return" from anywhere in the world to enjoy state-subsidized housing in settlements in Israel, only Jews are -- do you think that's a coincidence?
Anyway, first of all Jews have and had been in the Middle East for a long time before Israel's creation, they're well integrated in the rest of the world too, and if anything it is Israel itself that is placing "the jews" in danger
and even if there is, their "right of self-determination" is not superior to that of the Palestinians whom the Zionists ethnically-cleansed, and whose very existence the Zionists have sought to deny. "There are no such things as Palestinians" - Golda Meir.
It is also the belief that non-Jews are inferior and should be ethnically cleansed from that alleged and made-up "homeland" that was supposedly a "Land without People" but which actually had a lot of people who just happened to be brown skinned.
FYI Zionism was based on the same 'blood and soil' ethno-nationalist supremacist views that led to Nazism
The Wandering Who: A Study of Jewish Identity Politics
https://www.amazon.com/Wandering-Who-Gilad-Atzmon/dp/1846948754
Furthermore,
>Abraham, the Jewish patriarch, probably never existed. Nor did Moses. The entire Exodus story as recounted in the Bible probably never occurred. The same is true of the tumbling of the walls of Jericho. And David, far from being the fearless king who built Jerusalem into a mighty capital, was more likely a provincial leader whose reputation was later magnified to provide a rallying point for a fledgling nation.
Christians in Europe were invaders and converts too, so what's your point?
First of all the idea that "the Jews" even exist as a single unified "Them" is just as much rubbish as referring to "The Muslim World"
https://www.amazon.com/Wandering-Who-Gilad-Atzmon/dp/1846948754
These are all manufactured identities not actual, historical ones.
And there's no huge difference. "Invaders" FYI are a common theme in European history. Pretty much everyone invaded everyone else. The Huns and Goths for example also invaded Europe and just as with Muslims they too have left their influence there, they are not a separate "world"
> It is also the belief that non-Jews are inferior and should be ethnically cleansed from that alleged and made-up "homeland" that was supposedly a "Land without People" but which actually had a lot of people who just happened to be brown skinned.
Hertzl said nothing about that.
I don't believe that either.
There can be a Palestinian state but Israel must also be allowed to exist.
> FYI Zionism was based on the same 'blood and soil' ethno-nationalist supremacist views that led to Nazism
Incorrect. Hertzl was prompted to the idea of Israel by the Dreyfus Affair in France.
> The Wandering Who: A Study of Jewish Identity Politics https://www.amazon.com/Wandering-Who-Gilad-Atzmon/dp/1846948754
Not a reputable source.
> Abraham, the Jewish patriarch, probably never existed. Nor did Moses. The entire Exodus story as recounted in the Bible probably never occurred. The same is true of the tumbling of the walls of Jericho. And David, far from being the fearless king who built Jerusalem into a mighty capital, was more likely a provincial leader whose reputation was later magnified to provide a rallying point for a fledgling nation.
Even if that is true, it's still the only place on Earth associated with the Jews for their whole history. Some worldviews find that inconvenient, but that is not my problem.
Israel isn't going anywhere. They won't stop and neither will I.
Sorry, can't hear you over history as written by Jewish Israeli historians themselves
http://www.amazon.com/Wandering-Who-Gilad-Atzmon/dp/1846948754
Israel still has the laws about working on the "Sabbath". There's a pretty good discussion of the Sabbath laws in The Wandering Who:
https://www.amazon.ca/Wandering-Who-Gilad-Atzmon/dp/1846948754
> to return to their land of origins
What rubbish
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x16r9hy_searching-for-exile-truth-or-myth-couchtripper_news
First of all, the jews of the Levant and the Palestinians are genetically the same -- of course the geneticists who pointed this out was attacked and it was demanded that the article he wrote be physically torn out of all the copies of the scientific journal in all the libraries in the world, because it contradicts one of the founding myths of Israel:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/nov/25/medicalscience.genetics
Furthermore, even the rabbis are facing some facts:
>Abraham, the Jewish patriarch, probably never existed. Nor did Moses. The entire Exodus story as recounted in the Bible probably never occurred. The same is true of the tumbling of the walls of Jericho. And David, far from being the fearless king who built Jerusalem into a mighty capital, was more likely a provincial leader whose reputation was later magnified to provide a rallying point for a fledgling nation.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/09/books/new-torah-for-modern-minds.html?pagewanted=all
In fact the Zionist idea of a "Jewish People" was recently manufactured:
"The Wandering Who?"
https://www.amazon.com/Wandering-Who-Gilad-Atzmon/dp/1846948754
http://icarusfilms.com/new2014/exl.html
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/191693
>hey were driven out by muslims and other factors
Total rubbish. In fact you're confused the Moslems with the so-called explusion of Jews by the Romans -- which never actually happened and is a myth
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x16r9hy_searching-for-exile-truth-or-myth-couchtripper_news
I suggest you read "The Invention of the Jewish People" by Shlomo Sands:
https://books.google.com/books?id=pgsP0DFkmp0C&lpg=PA134&ots=qlApxSeo9C&dq=myth%20of%20jewish%20exile&pg=PA134#v=onepage&q=myth%20of%20jewish%20exile&f=false
https://www.amazon.com/Myths-Exile-Metaphor-Copenhagen-International/dp/1138886890
>convert otherwise you'll have a hard time, which means pay extra taxes
Again complete and utter crapola
The Jews under Islam fared quite well and in fact there was a renaissance of Jewish culture, a "Golden Age", under Moslem rule. In the Crusades, they sides with the Moslem forces against the Christians who had massacred them etc etc
Furthermore to the extent that were taxed, it was because they were excluded from the greater tax (20%) that the Moslems had to pay. In fact the Moslem rulers did NOT encourage conversion because Jews could travel freely to the Western countries as merchants, where the Christian church relegated them to money changers.
All this is just BULLSHIT hatemongering that has been cooked up
Modern Israel has NOTHING to do with ancient Levant, no matter how hard the Zionist try to spin it that way.
And nothing that happened 2000 years ago give some guy from Brooklyn or Ukraine the right to come over and take the lands of some guy in Palestine anyway
Funny -- because Jewish national identity is in fact a myth.
http://www.amazon.com/The-Wandering-Who-Gilad-Atzmon/dp/1846948754
> there is no concept of these nations beyond belonging to whatever ruling clan or tribe
And that is very much a description of Israel.
>Your phrase "manufactured state" is curious. What could it mean?
It means a nation built on an artificially constructed sense of national identity such as that which the Zionists created in order to manufacture "Israel":
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1844676234
http://www.amazon.com/The-Wandering-Who-Gilad-Atzmon/dp/1846948754
>The polls prove nothing.
LOL, I'll take the word of multiple independent polls over some ass on reddit anyday
The Wandering Who? by Gilad Atzmon. Beautifully written and hard to counter.
Are you claiming that Judaism arose spontaneously, out of thin air? Perhaps the Hebrews just sprang out of the ground somewhere? Are you arguing that Judaism is the first, or earliest religion? That it has no historical antecedent whatsoever? That monotheism was not, in fact, predated by polytheism? Have you conducted any research to support these claims?
The segments in my post are well-cited. Perhaps you'd like to refute the authors of the research? By all means, look up the citations and compose angry, emotionally-based retorts to this historical and archaeological research.
Educate thyself. The following works are by Israeli authors:
The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts
Authors: Israel Finkelstein, Professor of Archaeology at Tel Aviv University, and Neil Asher Silberman, an archaeologist, historian and contributing editor to Archaeology Magazine.
The Invention of the Jewish People
Author: Shlomo Sand, Professor of History at Tel Aviv University
The Wandering Who
Author: Isreali-born Gilad Atzmon
Review:
It is a scholarly and truly monumental work, deeply profound and, of course, controversial. (Alan Hart, British Journalist and covert diplomat in Middle East, ITN's News at 10, BBC's Panorama)
I see, so you're promoting the myth that Jews have superior rights to land by virtue of being Jewish.
You think being Jewish gives you some sort of genetic right to other people's lands? So some guy in Brooklyn or Ukraine has superior rights than a Palestinian by virtue of claiming descendance from the ancient Jews of 2000 years ago? Or that "Jews" are in fact some sort of exclusive category of people rather than just another religion followed by people who intermixed with lots of other people?
FYI the idea of a "Jewish nation" is relatively modern
>The Wandering Who Gilad Atzmon
https://www.amazon.com/Wandering-Who-Gilad-Atzmon/dp/1846948754
Even if the Bible were taken literally, the ancient Jews were the dominant force in the Levant for about 800 years, and there's no reason to take the Bible literally
>Abraham, the Jewish patriarch, probably never existed. Nor did Moses. The entire Exodus story as recounted in the Bible probably never occurred. The same is true of the tumbling of the walls of Jericho. And David, far from being the fearless king who built Jerusalem into a mighty capital, was more likely a provincial leader whose reputation was later magnified to provide a rallying point for a fledgling nation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/09/books/new-torah-for-modern-minds.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/643380/posts
there was no Roman expulsion of Jews in 70AD, there was no Exodus, "King" David was a small-timer, etc. etc.
http://www.amazon.com/The-Wandering-Who-Gilad-Atzmon/dp/1846948754/ref=pd_sim_b_2?ie=UTF8&refRID=1GX0AG3YPR0P2GSAS1JA
http://www.amazon.com/Invention-Jewish-People-Shlomo-Sand/dp/1844676234/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1409511043&sr=1-1&keywords=Shlomo+sands
Nonsense, and nobody said facts matter less than feelings. It is a FACT that Palestnians have been ethnically-cleansed by Israel. Note that not ONE jew is sent to refugee camps, only Palestinians are, and not ONE Palestinian is granted an automatic "Right of return" from anywhere in the world to enjoy state-subsidized housing in settlements in Israel, only Jews are -- do you think that's a coincidence?
Anyway, first of all Jews have and had been in the Middle East for a long time before Israel's creation, they're well integrated in the rest of the world too, and if anything it is Israel itself that is placing "the jews" in danger
Second, there is no "The Jews", it is a manufactured identity
https://www.amazon.com/Invention-Jewish-People-Shlomo-Sand/dp/1844676234
https://www.amazon.com/Wandering-Who-Gilad-Atzmon/dp/1846948754
Anyway, why should the Palestinians have to pay for Europe's antisemitism
https://www.amazon.com/Ethnic-Cleansing-Palestine-Ilan-Pappe/dp/1851685553
The Holocaust (C) is the "new" Jewish religion.
To find out more, read this.
Yes yes, we're all aware of the "new antisemitism" wherein every criticism of Israel is defined as anti-semitic but sorry no one is buying it. http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-Ed-Contributors/Yes-all-criticism-of-Israel-is-anti-Semitic
There is no such thing as a "Jewish people" -- this is a recently manufactured identity according to Prof Shlomo Sands at Hebrew University http://www.amazon.com/Invention-Jewish-People-Shlomo-Sand/dp/1844676234
http://www.amazon.com/The-Wandering-Who-Gilad-Atzmon/dp/1846948754/ref=pd_sim_b_2?ie=UTF8&refRID=1K0K6CEMKZXZWMFEGKPC
This is one of the many myths of Zionism -- there was no Roman Expulsion, there was no "King" David, there was exile from Egypt either, etc. etc. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/643380/posts
and even if there is, their "right of self-determination" is not superior to that of the Palestinians whom the Zionists ethnically-cleansed, and whose very existence the Zionists have sought to deny. "There are no such things as Palestinians" - Golda Meir.