Reddit reviews Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution

With regards to the blog post:

Your point was to create a distinction between students and working social scientists, which is unfounded given the highlighted segment of the post.

With regards to using personal experience as evidence:

I brought it up once, to meet you half on your emphasis on personal experiences. It was not intended as evidence or proof or anything of that sort.

I am not so foolish as to think my own experiences are inherently generalizable.

With regards to having no sources:

At the moment I have three, and to counter I have "No, I've seen different".

But alright, if you wish more:

http://www.amazon.ca/Third-Culture-Beyond-Scientific-Revolution/dp/0684823446

https://www.dukeupress.edu/Science-Wars/index-viewby=author&lastname=Aronowitz&firstname=Stanley&middlename=&sort=newest&aID=1472866.html

http://www.amazon.com/Consilience-Knowledge-Edward-Osborne-Wilson/dp/067976867X

Anyway, this discussion has clearly become pointless. You refuse to acknowledge any evidence that doesn't fit into your personal narrative and keep attempting to assert what I'm saying is ridiculous to dismiss my point.

But on the plus side, your argumentation has fully convinced me you're a social scientist.