Reddit Reddit reviews Toshiba 32GB FlashAir III Wireless SD Memory Card, White,(PFW032U-1CCW)

We found 6 Reddit comments about Toshiba 32GB FlashAir III Wireless SD Memory Card, White,(PFW032U-1CCW). Here are the top ones, ranked by their Reddit score.

Computer Accessories & Peripherals
Electronics
Memory Cards
Computers & Accessories
SecureDigital Memory Cards
Toshiba 32GB FlashAir III Wireless SD Memory Card, White,(PFW032U-1CCW)
Card capacity 32GB, 10 Speed ClassCompliant standard: SD Memory Card Standard Ver.4.0Easily transfer photos and videos from your FlashAirTM III card to your mobile device through a Wi-Fi connection.Access the internet and your FlashAirTM III card through your mobile device using the internet pass-thru feature5-year standard limited warranty included
Check price on Amazon

6 Reddit comments about Toshiba 32GB FlashAir III Wireless SD Memory Card, White,(PFW032U-1CCW):

u/rimble · 14 pointsr/SleepApnea

You want to use Sleepyhead for detailed analysis. You can put an SD card in the ResMed it will write detailed info to it, then put that SD card in your computer to get the data off and into Sleepyhead.

I use this sweet wireless SD card that just appears on my network now, so from my computer I can just connect to it and copy the files.

Was a little tricky to get working, but very nice once I did.

u/Xywzel · 8 pointsr/UnethicalLifeProTips

Any GPs features I found where on camera side or just preloaded map data. But https://www.amazon.com/Toshiba-FlashAir-Wireless-Memory-PFW032U-1CCW/dp/B00UOYPZP2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1503509963&sr=8-1&keywords=wifi+sd+cards says it can be accessed trough internet, so if you have that feature turned on, and the camera is turned on in area with open wifi, you could theoretically use the address to locate the nearest wifi. But because there likely is not DNS routing for your camera, and the ip for the card is determined based on the wifi it currently is on, you would have to do constant ip and port scanning, which might be illegal. Most of these cards work as wifi hotspots and not as devices that join to outside wifi, so these would only be visible to devices that scan for wifis, so unless you share a hotel with the thief, very unlikely that you find it trough that.

u/terminal_veracity · 5 pointsr/wyzecam

I haven't tried anything like this with the Wyze, but I regularly use a Toshiba FlashAir card to transfer data from my CPAP machine (thanks to a couple of ingenious devs).

The FlashAir can be setup in station mode. It will stay connected to your home wifi and act as a LAN client, so it will be available as any other network share. The contents of the FlashAir can then be regularly mirrored to a more accessible network location (like another computer or NAS). From there, you could view footage whenever you wanted or just preserve it as a backup.

Here's the card:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00UOYPZP2/

The FlashAir takes a little bit of setup and there's a firmware update that's needed. This can help:

https://mattshub.com/2017/04/11/flashair-sd-card/

Another CPAP user (TiredToo) made a Java app that automates the mirroring process:

http://www.apneaboard.com/forums/Thread-FlashPAP-FlashAir-WiFi-SD-card-utility

u/GeneralTzo · 2 pointsr/technology

http://www.cnet.com/products/sony-handycam-hdr-cx240/specs/
https://esupport.sony.com/US/p/model-home.pl?mdl=HDRCX240&template_id=1&region_id=1&tab=manuals#/manualsTab (docs links didn't work for me for some odd reason)
"Built-in Zoom Microphone"

looks like the only way would be to rip out the existing zoom microphone and solder in a 3.5mm stereo jack

There are probably adapters for 3.5mm to USB or for SD cards (there's a 802.11 wifi adapter in the shape of an SD card, and there might be a way to sync a wifi microphone) but the internal wiring and software would not be expecting audio input from those connections.

u/classic__schmosby · 1 pointr/technology

The FlashAir 3 is $10 less than the FlashAir 2 you linked.

u/winningidea · 1 pointr/editors

As long as you can break the day's recording workflow into 3-6 points where footage from the camera can be obtained by a laptop/desktop for video compression & uploading then you can satisfy the upload-speed/stability issue you highlighted from the beggining of your inquiry.

While you COULD be compressing the footage via laptop following the cameras around & aided perhaps by a wifi-sd card (but I haven't any experience with those who test them rigorously beforehand)... you'll be much better off with a stationary production table that features a dedicated desktop computer to handle the compression & uploading, while maybe the traveling laptop is purely to obtain the clips wirelessly or during the breaks you can wire in to copy directly (faster), thereby buffering-desktop compression so it can be completed continuously and not waste the time 1) waiting for clips to compress and 2) uploading everything at once instead of continuously while the event is still happening & clips are compressing (uploading shouldn't impact CPU during file compressing and so you can do both simultaneously)


To conclude, my workflow was assuming ~6-8hrs of footage (x2 for the two cameras), but if the actual recorded duration is a max of 3-4hrs then thats a much lower workload for the editor to address in a same-day manner. Trimming just 3 hours of minute long clips should be manageable by 1 editor in the same day expectation if you provide the footage throughout 3-6 segmentations uploaded throughout the day.

If it's closer to 4-7 hours of total duration needing trimming, and you only provide say half of it mid-day and the rest upon event completion I'd say it'd be hard (EDIT: impossible) for the editor to turnaround everything for the next day rendering for an official YouTube or similar publication UNLESS their timezone and work hours align so as to begin when your first amount of event clips have been uploaded for trimming AND theyre fine with long hours after getting comfortable with the simple process expected of them in context of the pay. IE: you can find cheaper editors for this task as compared to someone who actually needs to comprehend & interpret footage for where to make rough cuts.

The final render (full quality from the sources) would still take 0.5-2x real-time depending on your settings & computer hardware; so assuming the editor trims everything to your sanctification and you received that working project file early in the morning the next day (ie before the next event starts) then you still must assume it'll take at least the amount of time of the video to be rendered for the actual video render in HD + maybe double that for the uploading of the final render to YouTube on your low quality internet; averaging the middle scenario of these factors, a 2-3hr final render for you to complete locally and upload for worldwide viewing will take ~4hrs, or closer to 2hrs if you have great hardware and great internet (YouTube's or similar platforms processing time will be 3-6x real-time, so 2hrs will likely be available within 15-30 minutes depending on their load)