Reddit reviews What is Property?

> What do you mean? If you come on to my property I force you to leave. If you refuse I use force in self defense. What am I missing?

a coherent political ideology. I suggest you read a book, here's one

>Is defending myself or hiring someone to defend me from rape or murder "the state but with more steps"

 
>Your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins.

You're not being subtle at all here when you clumsily conflate violence against a person with "trespassing a statist legal fiction". "Your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins" makes about as much sense there as it would in defense of me stealing and hoarding all of your food, because not allowing me to hoard food is a form of violence. It's preposterous.

Yes, it is disingenuous to represent economic theory as black and white, and yes, laissez-faire is bad.

Now I won't speak as someone who is well versed in the works of Marx, but I think his ideas in general were correctly identifying the ends to equality in a society. The means of production should not belong to anyone who isn't doing the very labour that produces the commodities a society needs. Personally, I'm looking into what Proudhon, who was an anarchist, has to say about property. I think that property is an extent of the means of production. The proposition that property is theft is something I'm interested in exploring more.

Liberals are liberals. Someone calling themselves a liberal but holding beliefs that aren't core to liberalism, and instead ultranationalism, is what I would call a crypto-fascist.

As someone who is somewhat active in r/ENLIGHTENEDCENTRISM, I've seen the occasional person come by and say that you guys don't understand what centrism is. Maybe some redditors in that community don't understand, and just hop on the bandwagon of clowning on "centrists." What I think the focal point is for why they're calling centrists fascist is to highlight the disproportionate amount of time and energy being spent into disavowing antifa counter protesters than actual fascists, even when the centrist will say both sides are wrong. They'll say "I don't like nazis, but..." and then go on to defend the nazis freedom of speech.

I'm not denying that there are calls for violence by those left of center, but it would be unequivocally false to claim it is equal in magnitude. Neo-nazis use their free speech to harm others.

And finally, even though I don't think I need to say it, it isn't every centrist they're attacking. It's likely those that make the false equivalence of neo-nazis with antifa