(Part 2) Best binoculars, telescopes & optics according to redditors
We found 2,411 Reddit comments discussing the best binoculars, telescopes & optics. We ranked the 608 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the products ranked 21-40. You can also go back to the previous section.
Like $500 for a smallish one, good for planets and stars.
Here is a finished version consisting of my favorite images of the objects within the solar system I have taken an image of. Sorry Pluto! Maybe one day I will get around to adding you! :)
Thanks for looking!
If you feel like looking at some of my other images or following me on social media, here is a shameless plug to my Instagram
__
Equipment:
Acquisition varied per target. Essentially the idea for these images is to take video in order to make the final image. I use a program known as PIPP to stabilize the video and discard frames that have no target within the field of view. Following this I use Auto Stakkert 2 to stack the best frames with the best atmospheric disturbance which gives you the most clarity as well as the least amount of noise. Lastly, I use a program known Registax 6 to sharpen and perform some other manipulations to the output of the Auto Stakkert image. All of these programs are available for free online.
If you want to see some other images that didn't quite make the cut:
My first image ever through a telescope
Jupiter double transit of Europa and Io
Jupiter with three moons
Close up of the moon
There are quite a few more, but they tend to just be worst versions of the above image which I think are the best versions of each target I have. The only one I have singles of though are Mercury, Uranus, Neptune, and the ISS. Can't really hope to get much more detail out of the planets, but I would like to retry the ISS one day.
You're after the Skywatcher Heritage 130. Pretty much the same telescope, hence the OneSky not entering the market.
http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-71018-SkyMaster-20x80-Binoculars/dp/B0007UQNTU
$50 less than the link you provided :)
Don't get the celestron. Their low-end range is very bad for a variety of reasons.
At that price range, I'd recommend the Sky-Watcher Heritage 130p. It has the same aperture (you'll be able to see the same objects), but on a sturdier mount, and better optical quality (the celestron has a flawed spherical mirror). It's on a very stable dobsonian-style mount, but you'll need to put it on a table to use it at eye level. It's pretty much what everyone on this sub recommends, and for good reason.
The moon will look phenomenal (it does through any telescope!) and brighter deep sky objects (Orion Nebula, Andromeda Galaxy) should also be visible. The planets will be doable, but I recommend getting a better quality eyepiece for higher magnifications. The 6mm Gold-Line eyepiece is a good choice that won't break the bank.
Clear skies!
How about this, it's 65$ in US and 25x70. Bigger aperture means better light capturing ability. I guess this is not all purpose, it's astronomical binocular and it's heavy. I don't have one myself so really can't say about the quality.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B003AM87Q4/ref=mp_s_a_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1479669954&sr=8-6&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_QL65&keywords=celestron+binoculars&dpPl=1&dpID=313pkGWRIUL&ref=plSrch
Yeah, buy the XT8 instead.
(Or the Skywatcher 8". It's cheaper than the XT6 on Amazon right now.)
Telescopes can be anywhere from sub-$100 to tens of thousands of dollars, it's really all about what you want to get out of it. If you're just getting into the hobby I'd highly recommend this telescope. It's sub 100 and decent quality. You can also add a $30 filter to look at the sun with.
If you're willing to spend more money, this is a great telescope at $400 USD.
Astrophotography can be as simple as putting your phone's camera up to they eyepiece or connecting a DSLR or CCD camera to a computer-controlled telescope to get many hours of images to stack to bring out the detail. Of course, this can get really expensive.
Do note: there's a saying that the more you spend, the longer you'll have to wait to use it.
XCSOURCE 20X-800X 8 LED USB 3D Digital Zoom Microscope Endoscope Magnifier PC Video Camera with Stand TE071
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00N4K22OA/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_QTKNDbPVBM32B
Definitely worth the money IMO.
Just did a bunch of binocular research last year. I was looking for a pair for similar things as you, though mostly stargazing and hiking. Personally, I wound up buying a pair of Pentax PCF II 10x50s, which are waterproof, well-built, steady, sharp, and ~$150.
8x vs 10x is a personal thing. I'd heard people say 10x was harder to hold still, but I found the difference there to be negligible and the extra magnification very nice to have. I'd go to a store and try out models that come in both magnifications (e.g. comparable 8x and 10x Nikons or something) to figure out which you like more and what you can hold steady comfortably. The field-of-view difference is there, sure, but again it's a matter of taste; to me, 5º for my set vs 6.5º for some others wasn't a deal-breaker.
It sounds like you're leaning towards mostly daytime use, which makes things a little easier, because the other big variable with binoculars is the exit pupil (= objective diameter / magnification), which controls how much light gets to your eyeballs. For the same magnification, a bigger objective size gives you more light-gathering power at the expense of more size & weight (& cost, usually). As an example, "standard" 7x35 binoculars have an exit pupil of ~5 mm, which is a good balance of weight and dusk-time visibility. 7x50s, on the other hand, sometimes get called "night glasses" because they're so much better at gathering light than your eyes that they really bring out detail well in crappy lighting. If you're going to be using these exclusively during the day, you could get away with a 4mm exit pupil, but I'd consider something larger if you're thinking about astronomy use or if you might be attending night-time games (especially poorly-lit high school or collegiate games).
So, in your 8x vs. 10x case, that means your choices are really 8x40 and 10x50 in a 5mm, or 8x56 and 10x60 in a 6mm. There's lots of good pairs in all of those categories; I'd skip the 7mm-exit-pupil pairs, since they get heavy fast at 8x or 10x. Generally you get better quality at a lower price point with porto-prism binoculars than roof-prism pairs, so that's a consideration, though the Monarchs are consistently well reviewed (they were also above my own price-point). Nikon does make a very-well regarded pair called the Action Extremes, though. I'd also look into Pentax and Oberwerk models. Oh, and if you wear glasses, make sure you get something with adequate eye relief so you don't have to pop your glasses or shades on and off every time you want to use the binoculars.
Good hunting! =)
Maybe this one:
http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-71018-SkyMaster-20x80-Binoculars/dp/B0007UQNTU/ref=tag_stp_s2f_edpp_url
You WILL need a tripod. This thing is big and heavy.
Cheap: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B005C75IVM
Better: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06X9C2VJW
With "Better" one, you also need this: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B016NBASBK
Even better: used "nikon smz-u" from ebay (~$1500)
Also, if you havent already, check Louis Rossmann's YouTube channel, he talks a lot about equipment for soldering and micro soldering: https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCl2mFZoRqjw_ELax4Yisf6w
I'm confused? You have an assignment to build a telescope to look at the sun, due in a few days? That is a weird assignment, can you please elaborate.
Building a telescope is usually a multi month deal. Do you have a primary mirror? Secondary? Eye pieces?
Or do you already have a telescope you would like to use to look at the sun?
Please be very very careful. Looking at the sun with a telescope can permanently blind you. There is a specialized material that is used for this. You can either buy a premade solar filter that fits on the end of your scope, or buy a sheet of this special material and make it into one yourself. I did this for the eclipse a few years ago and it was amazing.
Please do not try any other wierd method that does not involve this special material. You will go blind.
Here is a link to said material.
10"x10" Solar Filter Sheet for Telescopes, Binoculars and Cameras https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00DS7SCBQ/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_pbm3DbZTD2RXM
I use this cheap usb microscope. it will also record. good for identifying pests
These tend to get a lot of praise as really good Binoculars for Astronomy. Thinking about buying a pair myself.
Nikon Action EX
A tripod improves everything. For 10x42s you don't even need an expensive one. Just a regular old camera tripod will do. Your Binoculars should have a little screwhole between the two barrels (sometimes covered by a cap) that looks like this. You just get a cheap tripod adapter and you're all set.
Hello :-)
As /u/sflamel wrote -> For hand-held, <=10x magnification is recommended.
20x isn't overly high, so you can probably get away with any camera tripod.
Another alternative could be a mono-pod. 12345. Monopods are better for lower magnifications though; Also see this forum topic.
The deluxe solution is THIS of course ;-)
&nbsp;
In the summer, when the ground isn't cold, you can also lay down and just rest them against your head.
With these binoculars you'll going to be able to see the Gallilean moon's of Jupiter, Saturn will be a bit elongated 'dot', and of course many star clusters and a bunch of nebulae and galaxies will be visible as faint glow.
Have fun!
//edit: Added links
Great start on the binos. I have the same pair. Make sure you have a tripod though and I'd highly recommend upgrading the bino holder to something sturdier. For example: BARSKA Binocular Tripod Adaptor https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000BYH8EQ/ref=cm_sw_r_other_apa_UKfPybX5P9Z99
The adapter that comes with those binos is a bit flimsy, so it can shake a lot while you're trying to spot things. That gets quite frustrating and fast. Otherwise, if you don't have a tripod, get used to laying on your back and letting the binos rest on your upper cheek while you hold the far ends with your hands to help make it more stable.
For your first scope I'd go with something like this. http://www.ozscopes.com.au/dobsonian-telescope-skywatcher-black-diamond-collapsible-8-inch.html
Just as much aperture, but much cheaper too! That means money to put towards decent eye pieces!
Equatorial mounts are great for go-to scopes, tracking the sky, and Astrophotography. But they have a steeper learning curve for beginners. You have to balance them out, polar alignment them, carry them around in pieces, and if they aren't substantial mounts they tend to be a little shaky. If you plan on upgrading the mount to a full go-to do to Astrophotography, then you should plan on purchasing a mount that is up to the task. I.E. 1500.00 (USD) and up from there, just for the mount.
Dobsonians are so much easier to use and frankly are my preferred viewing for visual astronomy. Just aim the thing and look. You just have to track by hand, which correct me if I'm wrong but you would have to do that with the scope you selected originally. The dob I linked to will collapse for easier transport too.
At the end of the day, you want the scope that you're most likey to use. For most beginners that means something simple. Set the thing down and start watching the sky. Otherwise, you might get caught up being frustrated with balancing it and polar aligning and then the odd movements an equatorial mount will seem to make, etc.
Anyways, that's my recommendation.
I use this tripod and pistol grip head combination for my Nikon AE 10x50 binoculars, which weigh a tiny bit more than yours, and it's very sturdy.
I'm 6'2" and it can get tall enough for me to see up to about 45º while standing without crouching, but the best part is that you can spread the legs out really wide and sit mostly underneath the tripod (in a chair of course) in order to comfortably view straight up.
It's not currently in stock from Amazon (it should return soon), but typically sells for $60-$70.
And I use this tripod adapter.
Other folks here have recommended this handheld USB microscope, currently on my own Amazon wishlist.
From cheapest with the least amount of features to the most expensive with the most features.
SE400 Inspection Scope
-
Cheapest Option, no zoom, but large working distance at .5x Very limited and similar to getting a 250cc bike when you need atleast 1000cc. Great to learn how to scope with, but a waste of money after a month when you could have put the money to a better unit.
---
SW-3T24Z Trinocular Stereo Microscope
-
Trinoc without simufocal so you lose depth of field when the cameras on, ( you can only see out of 2 of the 3 ports at once ) and you cannot pull the scope out, so its got limited rage.
---
SM4B Stereo Boom Scope
-
Basic Binoc scope with decent features, zoom and reach. Decent working area around 5.5 to 6 in
---
SM4TP Simufocal Stereo Boom Scope
-
Best of the best for the price, has capabilty to have cmount camera attached for 3rd viewer on a tv for training or for youtube livestreaming, ect
---
Good luck! and dont forget to buy a ring light!
A brilliant telescope for a young child would be the Orion Funscope. I have several scopes but I have this in the boot of the car all the time just in case. It's a table-top scope which does away with complex mounting issues and the usual awful tripods that come with cheap scopes. It's got 2 decent eyepieces and a great little laser finder that other scopes like this don't have. As a very amateur astronomer for years, this is by far the best bang for buck out there in telescopes.
Tell her you're getting bored with her and this is the only way to save your marriage...
In all seriousness though you could start with a pair of 10x50 binoculars. They're actually a lot of fun and will give you an idea of whether or not you'll have continued interest. Or as others have said you could check out an astronomy club first.
I use these - https://www.amazon.com/Bushnell-Falcon-10x50-Angle-Binoculars/dp/B000051ZOA/ref=sr_1_4?dchild=1&keywords=10x50+binoculars&psc=1&qid=1572970529&sr=8-4
Edit: Also a nice pair of binoculars are a lot of fun on their own on a dark night, so you'll end up with binoculars and a scope in the end. There are much nicer binoculars out there as well. I used to have a pair of Nikon, but the image was honestly so close to these that I returned the Nikons.
> https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B003AM87Q4/ref=mp_s_a_1_6?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1479669954&amp;sr=8-6&amp;pi=AC_SX236_SY340_QL65&amp;keywords=celestron+binoculars&amp;dpPl=1&amp;dpID=313pkGWRIUL&amp;ref=plSrch
Can confirm. I purchased these and it's almost impossible to really see anything due to how jittery it is.
Without arguing about "free" ...
All those tools are pretty cheap, if you're into electronics or making you may already have them, you might be able to avoid a stereo boom microscope you may be able to get away with a magnifying visor like this (even then Amscope x5/x10 boom scope models aren't expensive in the US - e.g. $185).
I actually don't know of a 4" from Orion. They make a 4.5" that runs a little over $200 on Amazon. There's also this 5" Jones-Bird Reflector from Celestron. Quality seems ok for the price, but collimation is tedious.
There you go: SkyWatcher Skyliner 8" Dob. Best bang for buck, and will absolutely murder the shit out of the itty bitty Space Probe 130 in all regards.
OØÓÖÕMAN THE RARE TEN BROK PUPPO W0W
There are several different issues here.
ISS moves pretty quickly on the sky. You either need binoculars (as cheap as $29 ) and a steady hand, or a telescope with tracking complex enough that it can track satellites - those are not cheap.
Furthermore, all that tracking and stuff is money not spent on the optics, so while that telescope can pull this neat trick of following the ISS on the sky, it's not that good of a scope otherwise (for the money you spent).
A good general purpose telescope would be something with a very simple mount, no motors, no bells and whistles, but a good and large primary mirror. Basically, a Dobson or some other simple alt-az mount. Yes, there are good beginner scopes at $100, if you know where and how to look - for that money you get around 100mm (4") of aperture, good enough. For 150mm (6") or 200mm (8") aperture you need to spend around 3x more.
http://www.telescope.com/control/product/~category_id=beginner_scopes/~pcategory=telescopes/~product_id=09541
http://www.telescope.com/control/product/~category_id=HP_ProductZone1/~pcategory=HOMEPAGE/~product_id=09814
http://www.telescope.com/control/product/~category_id=dobsonians/~pcategory=telescopes/~product_id=08942/
http://www.telescope.com/control/product/~category_id=dobsonians/~pcategory=telescopes/~product_id=08943/
The bigger the aperture, the more stuff you see.
Here's an older post, the context was different (OP was looking for a general purpose beginner scope) but some info may be useful:
http://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/eeltj/telescope_question/c17jkxm
I'm sure a bunch of people will recommend this, but living in a low-light-pollution area makes for some amazing stargazing on a budget. Pick up some astronomy binoculars (or a smaller pair if that's too bulky/expensive), and a copy of Left Turn at Orion. You'd be floored what all you can find in the sky with only a $50-$90 investment.
I don't know your budget but this is a great telescope for a 9 year old and you wont be disappointed. It's durable and a really good scope that will last a long time. Maybe get a barlow lens because it doesn't come with one but it's the best bang for the buck. You will be taking this puppy out and orion has a great customer service. Here is the link
http://www.amazon.com/Orion-SkyQuest-Classic-Dobsonian-Telescope/dp/tags-on-product/B0000XMSNO
How technical / mechanically savvy is she? Has she shown a strong interest in astronomy, or are you giving her this gift in the hopes that she'll find it interesting?
The reason I ask is that while the second one you linked to is a better instrument, it's harder to operate the mount and get the scope to point where you want it. A non-mechanically savvy or only partially interested kid may lose interest because the mount could prove to be too frustrating to use.
I've had numerous telescopes in my life, currently have a mid-grade refractor on an equatorial mount, and it's a pain in the ass even for me. I don't use it as often as I would like because it's cumbersome. Cheap equatorial mounts also vibrate like crazy, blurring images the instant you touch the focuser.
The only reason to get an equatorial mount is if you want motorized / aligned tracking of objects. A smooth alt-az mount is just as easy to keep objects centered with IMO, and it's SIGNIFICANTLY easier to just aim at them.
If she does have a strong interest, and you're willing to stretch your budget a bit, you can get her a scope she'll grow into rather than grow out of, by getting something like this:
http://www.amazon.com/Orion-10014-SkyQuest-Dobsonian-Telescope/dp/B0000XMSNO/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1417754292&amp;sr=8-2&amp;keywords=orion+skyquest
My guess would be that the cost of making one is much higher than the expected demand for that product making it uneconomical to pursue. Nikon for example makes high quality binoculars as well as camera lenses and they haven't made a cross over.
I think it comes down to the quality of the optics. With binoculars, you only need the center of the image to be in focus for your eyes, since you can only focus on one spot at a time. Also, your eyes have a much smaller focal point then say a camera image sensor, and your natural lens can do some focal adjustments that would need to be mechanical for a camera.
I found this Nikon 7245 binoculars which have a 50mm objective and a magnification power of 10x. To get the same "zoom" with a camera lens, you would need a 500mm lens which has a massive amount of glass, weights a ton, and costs thousands. Of course, the camera lens will give you an image where the entire field of view, from corner to corner is sharp, which the binoculars can't.
Not entirely sure but I think i've heard her mention the Celestron NexStar 130 SLT before, which costs $400. I'm looking to get something similar, I will have about $500 saved up by june and then i'll do some more research to what type of equipment would be best to observe the moon and anywhere in between while I can hookup my camera to it.
Edit: I just checked, this appearantly was filmed with a standard camera, probably a good dslr with a nice zoom lens!
Holy Batman this is an amazing response!
The 4 year old has used a telescope before, he's just absolutely fascinated by space right now. If it was just him, I'd definitely be getting the £50 type scopes. Due to my interest, I really don't believe any model I get will be a waste of money.
I had the Heritage in mind, but had never looked at that Skyliner 150p, which has lead me to the 200p....I'm sure you know the feeling!
Already purchased Turn Left at Orion, definitely want a moon filter/scope as well as a planetary one.
Finder scope is essential from what I've read.
I think I'm settled on either the Heritage 130p or the Skyliner 150p. Is there any justifiable reason to even consider the 200p? I'm fairly certain I'll go in the middle for the 150p, but always welcome opinions!
Yet this Orion StarMax and this Orion SkyQuest keep appearing in my research. It will be between those 4 for sure, if you have any specific advice on those along with any accessories I need I would be eternally grateful.
Just to throw a spanner in the works - for purely planetary usage it could be worth looking at a maksutov. They typically have a longer focal length, which makes them excellent for planets but their f-ratio makes them less suitable for DSOs. They're also more compact which makes storage and transport simpler.
http://www.amazon.com/10022-StarMax-TableTop-Maksutov-Cassegrain-Telescope/dp/B002JO06PO or http://www.amazon.com/Sky-Watcher-S11750-Sky-Watcher-Virtuoso/dp/B00CIVV34Q could both be worth a look.
I use this one, not android compatible but takes great shots :D
Example 1 2 3
I don't have one, but this looks like it's in your range. It looks to be well rated.
You're correct, you are missing an eyepiece. They come in many different magnifications. When I got my first telescope, I also picked up these, http://www.amazon.com/Orion-08890-1-25-Inch-Telescope-Accessory/dp/B0069VXRLS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1418025111&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=orion+eyepiece+kit .
I bought one off Amazon. Here it is: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00DS7SCBQ/
Well, the traditional starter is a 50-mm refractor...what most people think of as a telescope. The optics are usually fine, but the mounts are horrible. I still remember battling mine. And the one my wife bought at the thrift store has confounded my kids. Tradition!
Another option would be a Newtonian telescope, which uses a mirror instead of a lens. They don't look like a "normal" telescope. However, they work just as well...and the mounts are a lot easier to use. The tabletop versions are portable and are intended for kids...
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00FM4A108/
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B001UQ6E4Y/
That's what I would have gotten myself way back when.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/XCSOURCE-20X-800X-Microscope-Endoscope-Magnifier/dp/B00N4K22OA/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1506438932&amp;sr=8-3&amp;keywords=usb+microscope
This is very similar to the one I have, I think it's actually the same just a different listing and the price was about £20 for me. Might've been able to get it cheaper had I looked. Nice and easy to use just have to remember to take the cap off, I didn't see the cap when I first used it and thought i ruined it because it looked all smudged until I was fiddling with it one day and managed to discover how it really worked.
The absolute best telescopes for beginners is a good 8 inch dobsonion. If you are willing to take the time to learn the night sky and don't need goto a good one is 400 or so new. For 650 you can get a push to 8 inch scope that allows you to tell it what you want to see and it will tell you how to push the scope to see it. True motorized ones are much more expensive
The reason 8 inches is the best starters is it's big enough to provide great views of everything from the moon, the major planets and all the brightest deep space objects. The dobsonion type scope is easy to setup,very stable, and light enough that it's not a big production to get it out and ready.
If you get a scope order the book "turn left at Orion" on Amazon. It is a great book that gives you easy to understand directions on where to point a scope any time of the year to see the best objects currently in the sky. Also see if there are any astronomy clubs in your area because they are normally very willing to help you get started
Astrophotography is a whole other can of worms and requires specialized telescopes mounts cameras etc
Below are some examples of Scopes and good reading:
https://www.amazon.com/SkyWatcher-S11610-Traditional-Dobsonian-8-Inch/dp/B00Z4G3PRK/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?keywords=skywatcher+dobsonian+8&amp;qid=1569033244&amp;s=gateway&amp;sprefix=skywatcher+dobs&amp;sr=8-3
https://www.telescope.com/mobileProduct/Telescopes/Dobsonian-Telescopes/Classic-Dobsonians/Orion-Limited-Edition-SkyQuest-XT8-Classic-Dobsonian-Bundle/pc/1/c/12/sc/13/101452.uts
https://www.telescope.com/mobileProduct/Telescopes/Dobsonian-Telescopes/IntelliScope-Dobsonians/Orion-SkyQuest-XT8i-IntelliScope-Dobsonian-Telescope/pc/1/c/12/sc/27/102012.uts
https://www.amazon.com/Turn-Left-Orion-Hundreds-Telescope/dp/1108457568/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?keywords=turn+left+at+orion&amp;qid=1569034887&amp;s=gateway&amp;sprefix=turn+left&amp;sr=8-1
In before someone else mentions the used Skywatcher 8 inch dobs that are currently on Amazon for under $300. Probably your best bet.
Honestly if your set on a $200 telescope the onesky or z130 best options. You may want to start with a pair of binoculars and tripod (for extended viewing) to help you get familiar with night sky. Binoculars are best value when starting in this hobby and unlike most beginner scopes you'll never outgrow them.
Zhumell 12x70 good for the price a bit large to be held by hand work best with tripod. I use bushnell 10x20 for quick viewing sessions light so easy to move from object to object.
I recommend starting with binoculars rather than any of those scopes also inside viewing no good with either. IMO to get the experience you want from having a telescope you'll have to invest in something likeZhumell Z8. That's why starting with binos will help you better decide if investing in a telescope is for you.
I bought my son these for Christmas and they are surprisingly really good.
No unfortunately I couldn't make it because it was a Tuesday and I had to work. I'm planning on making the next one for sure! I ended up getting these:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000051ZOA/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
How was the launch? Was it all that you anticipated and better?
Ah gotcha. I wasn't sure the age of your son, but it's awesome you are looking for one for your young son and helping him to venture into the world of science. If I were you I'd just wait and find a decent scope on craigslist. If he is still interested in astronomy in a couple years then I would throw down some money on a scope. I think a smaller scope for seeing the planets and looking at the moon will be interesting for him. The Orion XT6 is pretty large, but they do sell a 4.5" model which would be a bit smaller and cheaper. Link
I wouldn't buy anything from Wal-mart or K-mart though, those scopes are kind of trashy. I used to have a Tasco when I was younger that I won in a fundraiser and I could see the moon and not too much else so it was kind of disappointing.
Best of luck.
> I am looking for a really good telescope that is between 100 to 150 dollars...200 would be pushing it. Does anyone have any good recommendations?
There is no "really good" telescope within your budget. An 8" Dobsonian would be ideal but it costs $330. Stretching your budget a little you could get a 4.5" one for $230.
Nikon 7245 Action 10x50 EX Extreme All-Terrain Binocular https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0001HKIK4/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_lwSzyb9FMP803
I started with this one. A celestron 130slt. I know people don’t like the computerized ones but in my opinion, for an amateur, it’s really great. Amazon has a warehouse deal for $320 right now. It’s a great telescope for beginners. I even took some pictures of the moon and stars. You can see the rings separated from Saturn but you cannot tell that there are two rings if that makes sense.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0007UQNNQ/
While nothing special https://www.amazon.com/Celestron-NexStar-130-Computerized-Telescope/dp/B0007UQNNQ has been a great learning scope for me.
Equipment (I’ll link everything as well)
Hardware:
-Celestron NexStar 130SLT Computerized Telescope
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0007UQNNQ/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_sHMFDbRWV6XEC
-iPhone 7
-phone mount
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01DZ45CPA/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_IIMFDbJMWY647
Software:
-NightCap Camera by Realtime Dreams Limited
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/nightcap-camera/id754105884
No processing was done.
Random question but I was wondering if you could compare the two telescopes below with the one OP originally asked about.
https://www.amazon.ca/Celestron-31051-AstroMaster-130EQ-Telescope/dp/B0013Z42AK
https://www.amazon.ca/Celestron-NexStar-130-Computerized-Telescope/dp/B0007UQNNQ
I'd mainly be interested in Jupiter and Saturn and would be willing to go up to the $599 cost of the NexStar but would rather just get a cheaper one if there isn't much difference.
this was my first scope, http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-NexStar-130-Computerized-Telescope/dp/B0007UQNNQ/ref=pd_ts_zbs_p_10693141_3/188-2997468-6997211?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&amp;pf_rd_s=right-5&amp;pf_rd_r=1RKJ9NYZ56K083VFJHY2&amp;pf_rd_t=101&amp;pf_rd_p=236989901&amp;pf_rd_i=524138
You can see all the planets, and even the Galilean moons clearly, and the shots of the moon are awesome. Good for the Great Orion Nebulae as wel.
The one I referenced above will cost more then people would expect to pay. But you will get excellent optics, the two most common eye pieces, and it will be small enough to easily take with you in the trunk of most cars. I bought the 8-inch version, and while I love it, I wished I had gotten the smaller one. There is no reason the one linked above or one like it could not last you the rest of your life.
Now if 270 is a bit too much you can check if there is a telescope store near you, most sell used scopes on consignment.
Or binoculers are a good alternative. The one linked should last the rest of your life. Will proved decent views of the heavens, and can be used by a nosy neighbor as well.
A third alternative is a good spotting scope. Through my brothers you can see Jupiter and its moons. For Binoculers and Spotting Scopes you will need a tripod for the best views.
Differences in these options.
Through the scope with a good night, and the right eye pieces you should see Jupiter's Major cloud bands and maybe the Red Spot. as well as all Galilean Moons and sometimes others. In the right conditions you will see Saturn's Rings and the Cassini division.
Binoculars and a spotting scope should yield views similar to OP's photo.
I'm on mobile, so my apologies for the terrible formatting. I bought Celestron 20 x 80 binoculars.
https://www.amazon.com/Celestron-71018-SkyMaster-20x80-Binoculars/dp/B0007UQNTU/ref=asc_df_B0007UQNTU/?tag=hyprod-20&amp;linkCode=df0&amp;hvadid=241980329968&amp;hvpos=1o1&amp;hvnetw=g&amp;hvrand=295537256250747200&amp;hvpone=&amp;hvptwo=&amp;hvqmt=&amp;hvdev=m&amp;hvdvcmdl=&amp;hvlocint=&amp;hvlocphy=9030158&amp;hvtargid=pla-355937355830&amp;psc=1
They are way bigger than I thought they'd be. Haha I'd recommend getting a tripod. I'm going to get one so I don't have to rely on my backyard wall! :)
There are adapters to be able to mount a pair of binoculars to tripods, like this one. But I just freehand it most of the time. Leaning against my car, a tree, or lying on my back on the ground. Now if you go with something larger than 10x50 binoculars you pretty much need a tripod/monopod. But even then they are awkward to use I find unless you drop some more cash on ones built for stargazing like this one where it angles it so you don't have to strain your neck trying to look through them.
Ok I read through some articles. Kind of complicated! Thanks a lot for your help.
Do you have thoughts on this one? It's $20 more for the barlow, is there a difference in barlows or should I get the one that comes in a bundle?
The other one that looks interesting is [this computerized one.] (http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-NexStar-4-SE-Telescope/dp/B000GUFOBO/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top#Ask) This might be slightly out of our price range when you throw in accessories.
Is she interested in using the telescope visually too? or mostly just for photography?
A "complete package" scope at that price that would be pretty decent for visual and also decent for lunar/planetary/very bright DSOs is the Celestron NexStar 4se plus a T-adaptor and T-ring for her Nikon. Total: under $500
One that would require a bit more work and luck to find used stuff, but might be worth it if she wants to continue with the hobby: Used Celestron AVX or Orion Sirius mount, some kind of power option, cheap 80mm refractor like the Orion Short Tube, T-ring for Nikon. Total: Maybe $600 if you get lucky
Here's a Celestron 4SE sitting at the top of your budget. It's computerized, I think you can do some astrophoto with it and you don't need to worry about collimation as much as with a simple reflector.
If you get tired of it you can probably resell it on Craigslist for $300 any time in the next 5 years, so in a way you are committing $200 to own a nice telescope with more versatility than a Dob.
Dobsonian scopes are so popular because the mounts are so cheap to make, and a good (non-dob) mount can cost you more than the scope itself. This one has a bit of extras attached, like what appears to be some sort of goto add on, but it's far from the most expensive scope you'll ever see.
The key to telescopes is aperture. This one looks like a 12"? it could be an 8" (that's the diameter of the mirror inside). This 12" dobsonian with goto is $1,780. 1,179 if you want to manually move it while still having a computer tell you where to point. And only $629 if you want to skip the electronics all together. Now switch to a refracting telescope (what most people imagine when they think of telescopes). This 5" televue (less than half the aperture than the dobsonians, so see less deep space stuff) without any eyepieces, mounts, finder scopes, etc is $7,295. It's still not the most expensive amateur telescope out there, but you get the point. For the exact same price, you can get an 18" dobsonian telescope with a mount.
My first "serious" telescope was an Orion XT8. Just a scope that sits on a wooden box (aka, a dobsonian mount). It came with two eye pieces, a red dot finder, and a higher quality focuser. It costs $349. Later on, I upgraded to a Nexstar 8. They're the same size, will more or less see the same things, but the price jumps to $1,200, and this is still a fairly low end scope if you really want to get into astronomy.
I'm in my mid 20s and I would straight up marry the woman who bought me this.
when you see a measurement such as 6" it just means the primary mirror (big one at the back of the telescope) is 6 inches in diameter. "dob" is just an abbreviation of "dobsonian" which is just a type of mount for the telescope.
The one I have is the skywatcher heritage 130p, which after checking is a little smaller than 6" (5.1") and cost £140
Here it is on amazon.
Interesting. With your sub $200 can you see anything but the moon?
I also saw this dob from an old post
Skywatcher Heritage130P FlexTube Dobsonian Telescope Black
Skywatcher Heritage130P FlexTube Dobsonian Telescope Black https://www.amazon.com/dp/B002828HJE/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_2NZ1Db7QCXVE9
Argentina eh? Is that 570 American Dollars?
Good looking scope.
Do you have dark skies where you are? I started off with a Celestron 130mm, but I live in San Jose, CA (which has bad sky pollution), so sold it for a smaller 90mm Mak. In city areas, I think 90mm Maks or (or small Dobs) are the way to go. Easy set up.
But this is a personal preference (I have no patience for those EQ mounts! It took me three trips from my room to the drive way to set everything up. Then you have to align it, etc.)
That was my initial idea but the Mrs talked me out of it. Something about the feeling of using a telescope, which I had to agree with.
I think I'm about to pull the trigger on this one http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002JO06PO/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1&amp;smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER.
Getting your first scope is so exciting! I'm very much an amateur and casual observer myself, but my dad and I have been into astronomy for about four years now.
First, I recommend looking into some space/astro societies in your area, there's Tacoma Astronomical Society and Rose City Astronomers in my area for example! Each club has different resources, but they can be super helpful. You can meet locals and see if they have resources you can rent- like telescopes, or books and whatnot. It's saved me a dime or two. Sometimes they have online forums too. I also highly recommend going to star parties, it's where I've learned the most! You can see other people's set ups, ask loads of questions, and get a better sense for what you might want. We did this for about 6 months before getting our first scope, and before that we nabbed a pair of nice binoculars .
Now, you have to consider, when you get a scope you aren't just getting a scope. You're probably getting filters, eye pieces, protective gear, batteries, red lights, etc. etc. and then probably a tool box to carry all of this- which you might want to customize with foam or something to keep everything safe and tidy. It's an Investment. Now, looking at jupiter and saturn won't require much, but eventually you might want to look at the moon (needs filters), or special eyepieces that let have more magnification, or there's even filters that let you see some colors, etc!
I, personally, would highly recommend getting a manual (specifically, Dobsonian *) scope for your first one- not computerized. Learning the sky and it's constellations is part of astronomy, and having to find stuff yourself is really helpful- and rewarding! Plus, computerized scopes require pretty hardy batteries, especially if you want to take it out to darker skies which usually means more rural aka no plugs. They also require certain stars to be be visible to be able to calibrate. Manual scopes require no plugs, no consistent power source, and no learning computer programs-NexStar can be a pain imo, some reading required (plus Jupiter and Saturn are pretty easy to spot with the naked eye anyways). Plus it's fun being able to point out stuff to friends just by knowing where a few stars are. We only got a computerized equatorial mount (meaning it tracks objects) when we wanted to try out long exposure astro- photography. This 8in dob was our first scope, and I still love it- it's the go-to (Craigslist, amazon used, and other shops are worth a gander too).
*I'm 99% sure dobsonian and newtonian telescopes are the same, except for the mounts they're on (newtonian is tripod, dobsonian is a base that can move up down and in a circle)
Also, I consider Sinnott's Sky Atlas a must!
Lmk if you have any questions!
(Edit: sorry if this is repetitive- reddit says there are four comments, but isn't letting see me them atm.)
Honestly, in reasonably dark skies you can see truly extraordinary things with binoculars. I've done a fair bit of astrophotography, but these days with very few exceptions I'm looking through binoculars. But you need astro binocs, not some random binocular. Regular binoculars have apertures that are too small - everything looks dark. I own and use these and only these -- Celestron 25x70s for 65 bucks. It comes with a thing to connect it to any tripod, so you don't have to hold it. If you don't own a tripod, you can get one on Amazon for 15 bucks.
Clear skies!
In reality, the binoculars are literally two small refractor telescopes:)
You'd be surprised how awesome a decent set of binoculars can be for just starting out. Throw them on a tri-stand and star gaze away. Doesn't have to be super expensive to get some results.
https://www.amazon.com/Celestron-71008-SkyMaster-25x70-Binoculars/dp/B003AM87Q4/ref=sr_1_5?s=photo&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1479672679&amp;sr=1-5&amp;keywords=binoculars+celestron
Even in the middle of the city, we look up and see all kinds of stars we cant see with the naked eye and our minds are pleasantly blown.
I bought these from amazon. They're pretty amazing and not too bad for looking at the stars. The orion nebula blows me away every time.
And that's the best pic you could get? Lol link it so I don't buy that one. I'm looking at getting this one or this one. I've seen much better shots from the 2nd one that someone posted on here. If you aren't happy with it maybe return it and try out a celestron, I wouldn't hang onto it for $80 if I wasn't happy with the performance, there are other options out there.
Smithsonian Handbooks: Rocks & Minerals, looking through the sample pages this seems to have great pics and good info.
I find myself still going back to my 30 yo Golden Guides or other Field Guides for IDs on various creepy crawlys and plants.
This USB Microscope looks really cool too.
Yea...I got this one about a month ago. http://amzn.to/1R96gCl It ain't bad, but I think I wish I got yours.
for surface mount, you need a hot air rework station, and most likely an AmScope or similar.
I would suggest watching a few of Louis Rossmann's videos to get an idea of what would be involved.
Looks like the same one I have on my bench. I got mine here. It's not the greatest, but it does it's job nicely.
wfish's is better than mine, but mine was much less expensive
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005C75IVM/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o06_s00?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
I've used it with 0603 components and 0.5mm pitch chips; so far so good. I find I rarely switch above 10x for components and inspection.
I have the exact same scope. Mine came with a 25mm Ploessl that allowed me to see Jupiter and it's four moons and allowed me to get a decent glance at saturn and it's rings. I've had mine since February and the planets haven't exactly been in good locations for viewing (and at convenient times...), but I'm in the northern hemisphere, so it'll be different for you. I got a Orion lens kit that came with a barlow x2, 6.3mm, 7.5mm, 10mm, 17mm and 40mm lenses as well as six different lens filters. Orion 1.25" lens kit
The issue I had with planetary viewing (and in general) is that my 6.3mm and 7.5mm lenses get me to almost 200x magnification, which as was mentioned, will be about the limit for the scope, problem is, my views were VERY blurry and hard to focus, I know my scope is collimated well (Something you should double check), but planets and the moon were crappy for getting sharp views. That said, the other night, I got great close ups of the moon, so I'm thinking the issues I'm facing are atmospheric, not equipment. Would love to know what you all think about that!
Hope my info helps!
I have put some effort into research for binoculars/telescopes myself and I bought Cresta Prestige PB321 for €30
$200 budget can also buy you this telescope https://www.amazon.com/Orion-10015-StarBlast-Reflector-Telescope/dp/B00D12U1IK that I got recommended from some site somewhere.
I can see Jovian moons with the binoculars but I don't have them long enough to look at anything more. I also have a lot of light pollution, so I doubt I should expect much more than Jovian moons with €30 binoculars
I'm thinking of buying that telescope if I still care enough to use my binoculars when my birthday comes around. I don't want to spend a lot of money on a 3 month hobby
I bought THIS off of craigslist for around $120(?) and I can see Saturn with it. It's just crazy to see it with your own eye.
Starblast via amazon.
It's a reflector so it has mirrors instead of lenses. Portable, decent aperture, good optics. I don't think you'll do much better for 200$ unless you get lucky on craigslist or ebay.
You can also get it on an equatorial mount but it'll cost more that way.
Ack, don't buy that telescope it's crap. I'd advise you save a bit more and get something like this: http://www.amazon.com/Orion-10015-StarBlast-Reflector-Telescope/dp/B00D12U1IK/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1374094182&amp;sr=8-2&amp;keywords=starblast+4.5
But if $60 is your top dollar you can do better than the Barska with these:
http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-21024-FirstScope-Telescope/dp/B001UQ6E4Y/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1374093969&amp;sr=8-3&amp;keywords=celestron+tabletop
http://www.amazon.com/Orion-10021-FunScope-Reflector-Telescope/dp/B00D05BIGC/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1374093969&amp;sr=8-7&amp;keywords=celestron+tabletop
http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-21036-PowerSeeker-70AZ-Telescope/dp/B003AM87PU/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1374094004&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=celestron+70az
Biggest issue you are going to have is for children to have any good luck, they will need to be able to find stuff to look at. With that said, I would bundle any telescope checkout with a copy of "Turn Right at Orion" as well as a red headlamp. I would also consider having parents sign some sort of release form that if the scope comes back damage you can go after them for the cost.
You might do better with a GoTo telescope. These make it easy to find stuff to look at if you get them positioned properly. I am not sure of you budget, depending on that I would go with this
http://www.telescope.com/catalog/product.jsp?productId=102026&amp;utm_source=google&amp;utm_medium=comparisonshopping&amp;utm_campaign=US-googlemerchant&amp;gclid=Cj0KEQiA1b7CBRDjmIPL4u-Zy6gBEiQAsJhTMHDaTbPhQ5-buq2SReWnyk_Mz2gYSK67XVWMkvSpdgMaAvPv8P8HAQ
I would also reach out to your local astronomical society to see if they would help. Here is a example of what the New Hampshire Astronomical society does.
http://www.nhastro.com/ltp.php
The telescope they use is this one
https://www.amazon.com/Orion-10015-StarBlast-Reflector-Telescope/dp/B00D12U1IK
I would actually not recommend the one you have listed. The larger scope will allow users to see more objects as well as a tripod will be harder to control shaking then a tabletop mount.
After realising there is a solar eclipse not too far (10h drive) from me in 3 weeks time I figured I should do something about it.
Only I have never photographed the sun before and I would appreciate some advice.
I googled around but other than "use a filter" I couldn't find anything specifying what I should do to get a successful image.
First things first, my tools.
I will be using my DSLR, Pentax K-5, due to the remote locations needed I can't carry a telescope.
I have a selection of lenses ranging from 17-50 F2.8, 50 prime F1.7, 18-135mm F3-5.6 and this is my longest, Sigma 70-300.
I also have a doubler so it doubles the focal length and also a 10 stop ND filter.
One thing I have looked for is a filter, not finding a specific lens filter but this stuff.
My questions are:
Thanks for reading
I'm pretty into astronomy, but just as 99% of our communication is nonverbal, 99% of my astronomy is naked-eye, watching the constellations swim by as the year goes on. The planets are a special treat, they add a lot of spice to the night sky with their movements.
My first scope was an Orion FunScope, a 76mm Newtonian Reflector. My next scope, a year later, was a 8-inch Orion SkyView Pro, an equatorial (follows the Earth's rotation) Newt Reflector. Newtonian Reflectors are my scope of choice, easiest to use. It requires a lot of patience and knowledge of the night sky and how the Earth rotates. My biggest achievement is locating Nova Delphini with only star-hopping.
http://www.rocketroberts.com/astro/firstscopes.htm
Fun Scope and First scope are table top, easy to handle, ‘scopes I’ve read about. A finder scope on the side to locate objects is important shouldn’t be overlooked. Edit: I’m partial to this one but I’ve never used it. Again, note the finder scope that helps with pointing the scope at your object. https://www.amazon.com/Orion-10033-FunScope-Reflector-Telescope/dp/B00FM4A108/ref=pd_sbs_421_4/130-6793756-0166417?_encoding=UTF8&amp;pd_rd_i=B00FM4A108&amp;pd_rd_r=47425607-60fe-11e9-953e-dd131782f63a&amp;pd_rd_w=VqyX5&amp;pd_rd_wg=j4E2u&amp;pf_rd_p=588939de-d3f8-42f1-a3d8-d556eae5797d&amp;pf_rd_r=J6SKZGWA068T3AY8WFN9&amp;psc=1&amp;refRID=J6SKZGWA068T3AY8WFN9. Edit edit: you might want to look into a smartphone adapter. Not too much $$. This sends the image from 5he scope into,the phone camera. Bingo, big display screen foe all to view. Some an be klunky and might be best to 5he adults to set up.
I used a cheap macro clip-on for my phone. I ordered one for like 6$ on amazon as a small set containing 3 different types...
Something like this:
https://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B01I9J21WI/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
I also ordered a cheap USB Microscope but that needs to be connected to a laptop, but it has some good magnification, but a VERY limited field of depth.
https://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B00N4K22OA/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
For the USB one...
To check out some shots look here:
https://growdiaries.com/diaries/1387-try-number-2/week/8120
Hope that helps
P.s.: usable shots with the USB one were obtained by cutting of a popcorn bud ;)
20-800X for $20, OSX and Windows
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00N4K22OA/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
suck it trebek
Sure - was 20 dollars off amazon. This is the best quality pics I've gotten with it so far, bit hard to focus just right but 1000000 X easier than a hand held loupe that drives me nuts trying to hold it still close up to a bud. With this I just cut a small sample, bring it inside, set the cam over it and plug the usb into my mac. View the feed using an app store app called quick cam - or can even use photobooth but i think that degrades the video quality a bit
Note: with this usb scope, it might look like the trichs are clear on the outside, but it's more of a reflection / due to the white background and bright light. Notice how the trichomes in front of the actual green plant matter are cloudy - it's because the green contrasts, while the outside trics over the white look clear, they are almost certainly not so.
Link to product: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00N4K22OA/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
Eyeskey Universal Cell Phone Adapter Mount - Compatible with Binocular Monocular Spotting Scope Telescope and Microscope 106g (3.74oz) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01J9F19I8/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_2shCyb5EYFKZ5
This specific link said it was sold out , but I have seen it many times on Amazon in the past. This is just the exact link of where I got it
I've been using one of these. Works great once you figure out the right adjustment.
Eyeskey Universal Phone Spotting Scope Adapter Mount Compatible with Telescope, Spotting Scopes, Binoculars, 106g (3.75oz) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01J9F19I8/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_3Q6ZAbC4TGKD6
You'll want to look for something like this, but not necessarily that exact one. You'll want to make sure you find one that will fit the phone that will be used. The more expensive you go, the more universal and rugged they will be. The trouble is that the scope will lose balance if you go to heavy, making it hard to aim it (though you could always add some kind of a counterweight to the back).
This will not attach to a tripod, and I would absolutely not recommend trying to. The scope is heavy enough with enough mass that even a high-end camera tripod will not hold it steady enough for telescope observation. And if you're going to spend money on a tripod to go with this thing, then you might as well just spend more money on a bigger, full-size scope that doesn't require a tripod.
You will need a solid surface for this to sit on, ideally a surface that is separate from anything you're sitting on, as the slightest movements will induce vibrations that will be visible through the eyepiece. That is, try to avoid using it on a picnic table or something else that also serves as seating. Ideally, you'll have a platform like this:
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-F2KeHJjSDzE/VMGNE5azqCI/AAAAAAAAPn4/lvMC7EXmY5E/w549-h732-no/2015-01-22.jpg
Except I don't know any place that sells tripod stools like that commercially, so you might have to get creative.
What kind did you get? I got this one: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01J9F19I8/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_nJLYAbKCMH30Z
Check this out.
I’ve gotten Jupiter with the 70AZ, but nothing I’m proud enough to post yet. With how close it is right now you should be able to get a picture with the moons all in one shot. Do you have a bracket or something to hold the phone? There’s a bunch out there if you don’t, you can get them overnighted from Amazon for a total of less than $10. See below, hopefully the link works
Eyeskey Universal Phone Spotting Scope Adapter Mount Compatible with Telescope, Spotting Scopes, Binoculars, 106g (3.75oz) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01J9F19I8/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_whCbBbE27VCWJ
Simple bushnell binoculars. Here is an amazon link: http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B000051ZOA?pc_redir=1397182662&amp;robot_redir=1
I was actually salivating over this just last night.
*edit: Oops, just saw the UK note. My fault. Dumb question - wouldn't you be able to just buy that from the US Amazon site?
I have this one and I love it: https://www.amazon.com/Orion-10014-SkyQuest-Dobsonian-Telescope/dp/B0000XMSNO/ref=pd_sbs_421_2?_encoding=UTF8&amp;pd_rd_i=B0000XMSNO&amp;pd_rd_r=4PBPDVSK8CK92CENCT31&amp;pd_rd_w=E0pXs&amp;pd_rd_wg=Ltec5&amp;psc=1&amp;refRID=4PBPDVSK8CK92CENCT31
I can certainly see the 4 major moons and the cloud bands on Jupiter with a Dobsonian 4.5 that I got my kids for Christmas
Saw them on the second night out and second time I ever looked through a telescope (first night was spent checking out the moon). I'm not sure, seems doubtful actually, that I could make out the shadows with the 4.5. A week into owning a telescope and I already want a bigger aperture!
Yes I'm located in the U.K and cool thanks for this advice :) I've done some looking around and I was thinking about the http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B0000XMSNO/ref=pd_aw_sbs_2?pi=SY115&amp;simLd=1 Orion SkyQuest XT4.5 because I'm just not sure.. But I will definitely take what you have said into consideration and look at everything you have linked.. :) thank you reddit stranger
Less than $200 CAD would get you a nice pair of binoculars.
https://www.amazon.ca/Nikon-Action-Extreme-Terrain-Binoculars/dp/B0001HKIJK/
If you can bump the budget to $328 CAD (overpriced but I only did a quick search), you can get 10x50 which is a little more magnification to bring out some of the Messier objects in more detail.
https://www.amazon.ca/Nikon-Action-Extreme-Terrain-Binoculars/dp/B0001HKIK4/
Are these the ones you're talking about? They do sound nice, and well within the OP's price range at around $140:
http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-7245-Extreme-Terrain-Binoculars/dp/B0001HKIK4/
(not an affiliate link, just being helpful!)
If you're going real cheap(almost disposable), Celestron Upclose, or anything that's 1)not zoom, and 2) not ruby coated. Better yet is preferabley fully multi-coated with BaK-4 Prisms. Optics is one area where more money can definitely buy you much better veiws.
But really one sweet spot is the Nikon Action Extreme 10x50 for $130(but NOT the plain Action).
Nikon AE 10x50
You might also consider the $15 Galileoscope.
For these binoculars, should I go for the 7x50 or the 10x50?
https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-7245-Extreme-All-Terrain-Binocular/dp/B0001HKIK4
I use http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-7245-Extreme-Terrain-Binoculars/dp/B0001HKIK4 Nikon 10x50, works great. You can not see details on Jupiter tho.
If you have Amazon Prime, it's on sale for $330 for until the next hours or so. https://www.amazon.com/Celestron-NexStar-130-Computerized-Telescope/dp/B0007UQNNQ
I'm new to astrophotography. Can I get a view like that with this telescope? (I also have these accessories)
Hi,
I am Irish, so would be buying from either Amazon UK or one of the Euro sites.
The old telescopes I had were the kids style refactors, I dont have expectations of the telescope tracking to object being spot on, but anywhere in the ball park is fine, I can use charts for the rest.
I live in a pretty dark area and holiday in the International Dark Reserve so lucky with the lack of light pollution.
As for what I expect to see, Planets with some detail ? making out Saturn's rings or Jupiter's moons would be great of course. Some deep field objects.
I thought the pics one of the reviewers took here were class
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B0007UQNNQ/ref=pe_2443651_89585181_em_ti
Found this setup on amazon. https://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B0007UQNNQ/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?smid=A3DWYIK6Y9EEQB&psc=1
This would be my first scope and I do want to use it for some astrophotography including planets, the moon, milky way and some more visible M objects. Will this meet my needs or am I out to lunch on thinking this?
First, no matter what you get, you're not going to see images like this or anything close to it. IMHO, amateur astronomy is about pushing the limits of your equipment, whether its your eyes, binoculars, or a telescope that will put you in debt for years. Perhaps more importantly, it's also about appreciating the significance of WHAT you're seeing. Even when I look up at the moon with my crummy unaided eyes, I still marvel at the fact that it's up there and we've actually landed men on its surface.
I started out with these binoculars and a tripod to hold them (they're heavy). The moon is spectacular, Saturn's ring structure is evident, and Jupiter is a bright white disc with its four moons lined up like ducks in a row. When I saw Jupiter's moons, I was blown away. They're little pin pricks, but the historical and scientific significance of their observation by Galileo can't be understated. Oh, and I was able to see the Andromeda galaxy. It's a little fuzz ball in the binoculars, but it's the damn Andromeda galaxy for crying out loud.
I then graduated to an Orion Dobsonian XT8. The moon is even more mind blowing, Saturn's rings show much more detail, and you can start to see cloud bands on Jupiter's surface. Andromeda is a brighter fuzz ball and other galaxies start to become accessible.
Flash forward a couple of years and I now have this because I'm trying to learn astrophotography, and I also bought a solar scope.
Once you start, you may never stop.
Good luck.
Since you mentioned stars, do you live in an area where a telescope would make sense? Even if you have some light pollution, as long as you're not right in a city, you can see a ton with good binoculars or a fairly affordable telescope. (I live within walking distance of a big mall with obnoxious lighting and can still see plenty from my yard.)
Check out r/astronomy first since I'm pretty new at that whole hobby, but I have binoculars from Celestron (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0007UQNTU/ref=cm_sw_r_sms_awd_teQ4wbX0HFY8W) and it's absolutely breathtaking how many stars you can see. The guide Night Watch is a good side gift to go along with it, although there are tons of free apps (I like Google sky map) that work well, too.
Celestron 71018 SkyMaster 20 x 80 Binocular
If you want to save money you can go down to 25 x 70, or even the 15 x 70. I personally own the 20 x 80s but have heard good things about the smaller sizes.
The 20 x 80s have a built in mount. But you would need one for the other sizes. The good thing is you can buy them, try them out and return them if you aren't happy through Amazon. At least in the US.
If I could bother you again, I'm looking at both of these binoculars and am trying to decide, based on the specs, which one I should get, but I'm mainly relying on the reviews to guide me and was wondering, if you had a moment, if you could recommend one or the other:
http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-71018-SkyMaster-20x80-Binoculars/dp/B0007UQNTU/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1334868191&amp;sr=8-2
And
http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-SkyMaster-Binoculars-Tripod-Adapter/dp/B00008Y0VN/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1334868191&amp;sr=8-1
Sorry to be a pain if you're busy!
I bought these for Xmas '11 Celestron SkyMaster 20x80
And tbh I'm a little disappointed, I wonder if I'm doing something wrong, because Mars for example doesn't look much different than a red bigger dot. It's pretty cool for the moon to be that big though!
Now if I can recommend one thing, like others have, is to buy a REALLY good mount, I got a cheap 30$ mount and it's really annoying, I cannot touch the lense one tiny bit or the entire thing vibrates due to the heavy weight of the binoculars.
Here's my setup, I used to have a spotting scope but I found I like this binocular setup more.
There's skinny ones by Celestron that are too weak and wobble in the wind. Sturdier ones like this one work great if the binoculars have room for it
I have these as well and paid about $30 for them used. Excellent binoculars. OP I recommend getting them with the tripod you linked. The binocular adapter that comes with it isn't very good you may want to buy another one. I got this one for like $10:https://www.amazon.com/BARSKA-AF10546-Binocular-Tripod-Adaptor/dp/B000BYH8EQ/ref=sr_1_1?s=photo&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1479749705&amp;sr=1-1&amp;keywords=binocular+tripod+adapter
Hello,
I'm a complete noob to amateur astronomy. I once had a cheap refractor telescope as a kid, but it's long broken. I'm currently looking to get a new one, primarily for the purposes of stargazing, but perhaps further down the line take some photographs (issue is I don't have a camera, nor am I sure I will get one). I'm more interested in viewing deep field objects, but as I understand it, the only way to do so is through long exposure with a camera (?).
I'm currently looking at a few different models:
Celestron NexStar 4 SE Telescope -this one being the absolute limit of my budget
Celestron 21035 70mm Travel Scope
Celestron 127EQ PowerSeeker Telescope
From what I've gotten from the 'What Telescope?' post, I need to choose between deep field and planetary viewing. What will I be able to see with my eyes, versus a camera?
Oh, I thought it would be cheaper.
I've actually found this and I thought it was a good deal.
Would this telescope be a good choice for Astrophotography?
I would prefer something can can assist me in tracking as much as reasonably possible.
http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-NexStar-4-SE-Telescope/dp/B000GUFOBO/ref=sr_1_2?s=photo&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1452609274&amp;sr=1-2&amp;keywords=Celestron+NexStar+4SE+Maksutov-Cassegrain
This is what I was thinking of. I think that is even on the telescope I had been looking at recently.
Nexstar 4SE - motorised and looked fairly compact.
Is this the scope you are talking about? C8
Pretty small aperture for that kind of price. Also, it's a refractor, which has inherent optical problems. For more than a thousand dollars, I'd look into something a little more powerful. For instance, a Celestron Nexstar 8. http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-NexStar-8-SE-Telescope/dp/B000GUFOC8/ref=pd_sim_sbs_p_3
This is an 8 inch SCT (Schmidt-Cassegrain; combines mirrors and lenses), which is much better than an 80mm refractor, optically speaking. And it also seems to be a fair bit less expensive.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B000GUFOC8
I know that alot will advise dobsons like the Zhumell Z-series, but honestly, if he is a geeky guy and also wants easy of use then consider the Celestron NexStar 8 SE http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B000GUFOC8/
In case it helps have heard very good things about this as a starter scope. Fairly serious power for that price. Do your research and avoid common mistakes made by beginners when buying their first scope.
Hey there and thanks again. I'm from Germany, btw.
The Heritage 130p basically is an identical design to the 76/300, just with an extendable tube, right? Link on Amazon. Because I'm actually tempted to return the 76/300 (still within the first 14 days) and get the 130 instead if the difference is so huge for just ~100 EUR more.
It's a very capable scope for the price, better than any refractor you could get for that money.
Edit because I'm being modded down: *at the price* it is the best telescope to buy (unless buying used). Yes, it would be better to save up and buy the Orion SkyScanner for 100 GBP (more than twice the price) or even better to get the SkyWatcher Heritage 130p u/phpdevster named for 162 GBP ... but that is almost 4 times the price. Good for OP if they have (and want to spend) that kind of money, but in the 45-50GBP price range the Firstscope *is* a good scope.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Orion-10022-TableTop-Maksutov-Cassegrain-Telescope/dp/B002JO06PO :)
Try these... At 25x you will see the moons of Jupiter, nice crater detail on the Moon, and excellent wide field views of deep sky objects. I have a pair of 20x80 and use them more than my 12" Meade Lightbridge. IMO this is the best place to start with a limited budget.
A USB microsope
However, I don't recommend the one above:
But... it's $40
*edit: fixed link
Amazon has this usb microscope by Celestron that I was looking at for $35. It appears to be one of their top sellers in the category.
Something alone these lines? or this? Or any other specific suggestions
Can you zoom in anymore?
How much did nug weigh?
I just bought a microscope just to take pictures of crystals, and mine is hard to focus with.
What scope you using?
I got http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-Deluxe-Handheld-Digital-Microscope/dp/B004QF0A1Y/ref=sr_1_sc_2?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1343523671&amp;sr=8-2-spell&amp;keywords=usb+miscrocope
I am also interested in a microscope/camera combo. Here is one I found on Amazon. Anybody used this?http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-Deluxe-Handheld-Digital-Microscope/dp/B004QF0A1Y
A microscope will help tremendously. Get one with an LED light and an adjustable viewpiece. This is the microscope I use at work. It does pretty well.
Grab some kapton tape and a good vise or very solid pair of helping hands.
A multimeter, quick alloy, desoldering braid, solder sucker, a collection of tips would be my next purchases in your shoes.
EDIT: Spend the money on the soldering iron. A good soldering iron will give consistent heat for quicker, cleaner work.
I am new at this, but the setup I had for electronics seems to be working well for mini painting. I am using one of these binocular microscopes:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005C75IVM/
and two LED lamps which total about
1600W1600 Lumens of 5500K light.Edit: Whoops, 1600 Watts would be blinding.
/u/CunningLogic uses this scope with 10x eyepieces and swears by it. You could get it directly from AMScope.
I went with something a bit more expensive and got ahold of a really nice used Nikon with zoom.
When buying glass, you usually get what you pay for so it comes down to how much do you want to spend?
What do you want to see in particular? You won't be able to see nosema with a dissection scope.
Edit:
You could also consider a USB scope if frame rate isn't a concern. They're incredibly cheap these days.
http://www.amazon.com/Orion-08890-1-25-Inch-Telescope-Accessory/dp/B0069VXRLS/ref=pd_sim_p_1?ie=UTF8&amp;refRID=1EW2QNPBT13A068NG434
is this a good buy?
Hey, I was going to ask a similar question like OP but I've had my mind set on the XT8. This would be my first telescope. I saw in amazon this kit would this be good for a beginner or is it overkill? It's a bit expensive but if it really makes a difference then I'd go for it.
Thanks for the recommendations.
I'll definitely be getting a Barlow (most likely this kit), especially if I get an Orion.
I love your astrophotography! I never knew there was equipment like the Optron Skytracker or the Vixen Polarie, it's a different equipment approach to astrophotography. I'll probably be getting a scope first, but I may explore getting telephoto lenses for this in the future.
the 10mm one from this. http://www.amazon.com/Orion-1-25-Inch-Premium-Telescope-Accessory/dp/B0069VXRLS/ref=pd_sim_421_7?ie=UTF8&amp;dpID=513A3GPm9yL&amp;dpSrc=sims&amp;preST=_AC_UL160_SR138%2C160_&amp;refRID=0ZWMZJSHFDKGAGVJZ6VV
Also what about something like this? Keep seeing 1.25 or 2 inch
http://www.amazon.com/1-25-Inch-Premium-Telescope-Accessory-silver/dp/B0069VXRLS/ref=pd_sim_421_3?ie=UTF8&amp;dpID=513A3GPm9yL&amp;dpSrc=sims&amp;preST=_AC_UL160_SR138%2C160_&amp;refRID=1XS7J23SB3HQF2A9F9J1
If you can find a local astronomy club or planetarium, they would have much better telescopes to look through. A moderate sized amateur telescope is way out of the price range you are talking about, but it's the kind of thing lots of astronomy club members have
If you decide you want one of your own, a tabletop one is better than one of those long refractors with a spindly tripod. The best optics in the world don't help you if the stand it is on wobbles around. "table-top" doesn't mean you have to use a table, anything stable and reasonably flat will work - stack of concrete blocks, tree stump, etc. To see much of anything, you need to get away from city lights, few trees to block the view, and preferably dry stable air.
A bigger telescope can overcome light pollution from a nearby city, but you won't be getting a bigger telescope with your desired budget. One on the rooftop of a planetarium or university building can be much bigger if it doesn't have to be portable.
It takes time for your eyes to fully adapt to dark conditions - be patient.
Those are nice shots.
I'm almost tempted to beg Amazon for a gift card in exchange for that telescope since I know for sure that my in-laws purchased it off their sit, however. Maybe buy this https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00D12U1IK/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_fPxnzbC9B0TSH
I actually went with the StarBlast. I also bought a couple of lenses and a Barlow, and a sun and moon filter (which, in total costs more than the scope itself, but should be translatable, when I decide to scale my project).
Honestly, dropping a couple of hondo on a scope doesn't mean that much to me, but I know me (I got into yoyo's, then the next thing I know I spent $2000 on freaking yoyo's), so I have to mind myself in that regard, and not go too crazy.
I hope that we'll be able to talk in the future, because I'll be wanting something more later on. I just needed something right now, as my girlfriend (who is amazing and has written over 250 papers...not on astronomy, btw) wants to go out this weekend to a hike to view with some people (thus my need).
I took Astronomy I and II in college, and loved it, so I'm stoked that she's into it. I am an engineer and have a degree in mathematics, so bring on the nerdy, baby. :)
Edit: Edited.
No. Binoculars have a much larger collecting area and therefore requires much larger attenuation. You can get an appropriate filter to cut to size for this purpose on Amazon for $30.
https://www.amazon.com/Solar-Filter-Telescopes-Binoculars-Cameras/dp/B00DS7SCBQ
Please do not risk your eyesight over $30.
I got just the plain film for $30 (10" square) or $10ish (4" square) for my scopes and made my own holder out of cardboard.
https://www.amazon.com/Solar-Filter-Telescopes-Binoculars-Cameras/dp/B00DS7SCBQ
Well, shit, the 10" is only $24 now.
There's a bunch of sizes available.
Solar filters are specialized filters that block out most light (something like 99.99%). But the Sun is so bright, that the remaining 0.01% of light is more than enough to take the kind of picture I took.
If you look up the companies Baader or Thousand Oaks Optical, you'll be able to find solar sheets that they sell. They also sell specific filters for telescopes and cameras but those are expensive.
For my project, I purchased this one: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DS7SCBQ
It's manufactured by Thousand Oaks Optical and it's pretty sweet! You might have trouble ordering them in such short notice though :( Good luck!
If you'd put the film over the aperture of the binocs first you'd have been fine.
I actually had a sheet of this: https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DS7SCBQ/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1 for my 8" telescope I'd ordered almost a year ago.
Cut it in two so a friend and I could gawk at the star. I was a little worried that it wasn't as good as the cheap paper glasses everyone had so we borrowed a pair from someone next to us and discovered to our elation that the 5"x10" sheet of solar filter actually gave a much better experience. You could basically wrap it around your face and block out all the other light and you didn't just have tiny little slots to look through. It could have used a strap but we got through it just fine and got a really nice experience. No burned eyeballs. A couple of stray reflections off my buddy's improvisor, but no worse than a reflection off a car.
Canon 70D & 100-400mm f/4-5.6 lens @ 400mm f/9 with a piece of solar film for all of the images other than the total eclipse. Shutter/Iso varied a little but between 1/500-1/1000 & Iso800-3200.
Removed chromatic aberrations and made some minor contrast/noise/highlight adjustments but the raw photos looked great right off the camera. They didn't need much- mostly a little cropping.
Taken from Crossville Tennessee
With your budget, definitely this. I started with a much larger telescope and bought the FunScope as as a grab-and-go scope and am highly impressed by it even though it is much smaller. From a dark sky spot, you'll see plenty with it although you may want to invest in better eyepieces later on.
Thanks mate. I have been look g at the funscope astro dazzle and it looks great for him. Only issue is they don't sell the in this country. I can get one shipped in from the US which wouldn't an issue but the shipping and customs charges might make it a tad expensive.
Just a thought is this the same thing?
FunScope 76mm TableTop Reflector Telescope https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00FM4A108/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_wCLRBb1A75TXD
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00N4K22OA/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
XCSOURCE 20X-800X 8 LED USB 3D Digital Zoom Microscope Endoscope
This is the microscope. For $18, its not top quality. The focal point is inside the clear plastic area, I had to shove the nug about 1/2 inch up inside it. I may take a hacksaw to it. But for the price, its rather amazing.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00N4K22OA/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o07_s00?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
this
I used this: https://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B00N4K22OA/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1
I should note, I didn't really know how to use it when I took that picture, someone gave me a quick lesson so future photos will be much better.
If you're locked into purchasing from Amazon, you have these options for an 8" dob:
$355
https://www.amazon.com/SkyWatcher-S11610-Traditional-Dobsonian-8-Inch/dp/B00Z4G3PRK/
$390 but out of stock until August 4th:
https://www.amazon.com/Orion-8945-SkyQuest-Dobsonian-Telescope/dp/B001DDW9V6/
hey! My first telescopes were refractors, don't bother with them for planets. I'd have to say the sky-watcher 8inch is a pretty good start, its the one I'm currently using myself. only 385$ usd on amazon, no shipping with prime, either!
https://www.amazon.com/SkyWatcher-S11610-Traditional-Dobsonian-8-Inch/dp/B00Z4G3PRK/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1500760446&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=dobsonian
Leaving aside all the "read the sticky" responses, one thing I'd recommend is, if you see one that interests you on Amazon, check prices at a few other places like the manufacturer's website, other vendors, and any photography/etc stores in your neck of the woods. Prices can vary, often in breathtakingly silly ways.
Depending on your location it can be worth looking at used stuff on Kijiji as well; every now and then I'll see people local offloading one telescope or another for whatever reason at "you're kidding, right?" prices.
Past that, if you're mainly interested in lunar/planetary observation from an urban environment, you've got some pretty forgiving targets - if you had a 16" Dobsonian with high-grade eyepieces it wouldn't hurt your viewing of the moon by any stretch, but you definitely wouldn't need that kind of gear.
I kinda want this for taking pictures of the stars telescope adapter
http://www.amazon.com/Celestron-NexStar-4-SE-Telescope/dp/B000GUFOBO/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1395671954&amp;sr=8-2&amp;keywords=celestron+nexstar+5se
Did you know Amazon will donate a portion of every purchase if you shop by going to smile.amazon.com instead? Over $50,000,000 has been raised for charity - all you need to do is change the URL!
Here are your smile-ified links:
https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DS7SCBQ
---
^^i'm ^^a ^^friendly&nbsp;bot