(Part 2) Best christian leadership books according to redditors
We found 61 Reddit comments discussing the best christian leadership books. We ranked the 27 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the products ranked 21-40. You can also go back to the previous section.
Great book I'm reading right now and many in my church.
God Space by Doug Pollock. It's super helpful for post-Christian ares of the country, but it would also work in still Christianized parts of the country, too.
Basically, it goes over how to create a space where people (unbelievers) feel comfortable talking about spiritual things.
Freedom and Boundaries by Kevin DeYoung is a good place to start.
Women in the Church: An Analysis and Application of 1 Timothy 2:9-15 by Andreas Köstenberger and Thomas Schreiner (two PhDs from Southern) is good for an in depth examination of that specific passage.
Jesus, Justice, and Gender Roles by Kathy Keller comes from the perspective of a woman who wrestled through this issue and examined all the relevant Biblical texts closely.
Women's Ministry in the Local Church by Ligon Duncan and Susan Hunt, is good for exploring the positive side of a woman's role in the church, while sticking with the orthodox position on ordination.
My favorite books have been where both sides of an issue are able to write out their beliefs, and then critique others. If that kind of book interests you, I highly recommend Two Views on Women in Ministry. There are four authors that first present their side and reasoning for their position, and then the others critique them. They then rotate. I also found Women in Ministry: Four Views. I haven't read this one, but if it's anything like the first book, it ought to be right down your alley.
Karl Barth
Thanks for the input. I just remember my professor stressing those points, I guess. I'm blurry on the details though!
Here's a good study on the role of bishops: http://www.amazon.com/Holy-Bishops-Late-Antiquity-Transformation/dp/0520242963/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_S_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=3FYTYH2RZQ1J8&coliid=IWMQ6FPOHJQ50
Regarding Adrianople, we have to keep in mind that the Roman army in the West was tasked with defending a vast frontier, whereas Constantinople was flanked by two seas and extremely difficult to invade. The West was geographically screwed, and with a constant flow of barbarian settlers thanks to Valens's folly I imagine the army was largely incapable of handling the situation. Plus the practice of intermarriage was so widespread in the frontier outposts that the distinction between barbarian and Roman was quickly fading.
But once again, I don't know the specifics. Was the army along the Western frontier actually capable of stemming the tide of invasions? I really don't know!
Two quick thoughts: