Top products from r/ArmoredWarfare
We found 5 product mentions on r/ArmoredWarfare. We ranked the 5 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the top 20.
1. Panther & Its Variants (The Spielberger German Armor & Military Vehicles)
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
Used Book in Good Condition
2. Mediabridge Ethernet Cable (100 Feet) - Supports Cat6 / Cat5e / Cat5 Standards, 550MHz, 10Gbps - RJ45 Computer Networking Cord (Part# 31-399-100X)
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
CAT6 / CAT5e: Supports both Cat6 and Cat5e applications. The RJ45 connector used for this cable fits perfectly in both Cat6 and Cat5e ports.CAPABILITY: Mediabridge Cat 6 cables can support up to 10 Gigabits per second (10 times the bandwidth of Cat5e cables). Meets or exceeds Category 6 performance ...
3. Tamiya Models X-10 Mini Acrylic Paint, Gun Metal
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
Can be used on styrol resins, styrofoam, wood, plus all of the common model plasticsCovers well, flows smoothly with no blushing or fading and can be blended easilyGlass jar with a plastic, color coded, screw-on lidPaint number X-10 on the Tamiya Color Chart
Tamiya and Testors are both good.
I use Tamiya paint jars with regular brushes.
http://www.amazon.com/Tamiya-Models-Acrylic-Paint-Metal/dp/B0099WPMGW/ref=sr_1_2?s=toys-and-games&ie=UTF8&qid=1457141300&sr=1-2&keywords=tamiya+paint
Practice makes perfect. Just do a base primer coat with a single paint colour. Then you can move to better paint jobs.
[This stuff] (http://www.amazon.com/Testors-3509C-Plastic-Cement-Value/dp/B00JDMWVSU/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1457137079&sr=8-1&keywords=model+kit+glue).
And thanks for the advice!
CAT5e is what you want - this would work: http://www.amazon.com/Mediabridge-Cat5e-Ethernet-Patch-Cable/dp/B003RCEAB8/ref=sr_1_6?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1452186484&sr=1-6&keywords=ethernet+cable
> The T-34 – widely considered to be the best tank of the Second World War
HAHAHA. No.
Even if its production wasn't marred by incompetence nearing seditious, it wasn't the "best" of anything. Later variants were better than others, but it was still simply good enough, such that they could make a whole helluva lot of them; that is what it was for in the first place. Every aspect was inferior in some way: the armor quality, equipment, crew comfort and ergonomics, gun, sights, the shells and their fuses. Hardly was it the "best" at anything, except being deploy en masse to overrun positions, as it was designed to do, and goddamn did it do that well. You really don't need to be "the best" when you got a couple hundred converging on the same objective.
That aside: Hell yeah, IS-7! Gimme dat russian bias! I needs it!
Edit: Oh no! Downvotes for stating well documented facts! The armor and welds were crap, the optics were crap, the transmission and gearbox were crap, the crew ergonomics were crap.
[CITATION]
Review of Soviet Ordinance Metallurgy: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/011426.pdf
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS OF THE RUSSIAN T34/85 TANK
Panther & Its Variants (The Spielberger German Armor & Military Vehicles)
T-34 Mythical Weapon
Tankovy udar. Sovetskie tanki v boyakh. 1942-1943
‘T-34/76 Medium Tank 1941-45’ , ‘T-34/85 Medium Tank 1944-45’ and ‘T-34-85 vs M26 Pershing’ by Steven J. Zaloga
http://www.operationbarbarossa.net/the-t-34-in-wwii-the-legend-vs-the-performance/