(Part 3) Top products from r/DebateAltRight

I'm a history nut as well.

Short starter essay to get you going; get in a comfy chair for this.

https://rense.com//general34/amaz.htm

Here's another good short starter on Bolshevism.

https://bloodyshovel.wordpress.com/2017/11/14/biological-leninism/

I'm going to give you amazon links but if you have time and resources try to go directly to the authors website as they get a better cut of proceeds. There's also archive.org if you're poor.

https://www.amazon.com/Under-Sign-Scorpion-Soviet-Empire/dp/9197289779/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1550521515&sr=1-2&keywords=juri+lina

Lina did a doc as well

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIuW-vNQsQI

https://www.amazon.com/Two-Hundred-Years-Together-Part/dp/5969703729/ref=sr_1_3?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1550521619&sr=1-3&keywords=200+years+together

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/02/20/english-translation-of-alexander-solzhenitsyns-200-years-together/

https://www.amazon.com/Wall-Street-Bolshevik-Revolution-Capitalists/dp/190557035X

https://www.amazon.com/Churchill-Hitler-Unnecessary-War-Britain/dp/0307405168/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_3?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1550521963&sr=1-3-fkmr0&keywords=hitler+and+the+unneccary+war

Awesome dissident right publisher.

https://www.counter-currents.com/

Awesome website with LOTS of great articles

http://www.unz.com/

Here are some starters

http://www.unz.com/runz/our-american-pravda/

http://www.unz.com/article/reply-to-jordan-peterson-on-the-jewish-question-from-his-heroes/

If you're a REAL big brained check out E. Michael Jones

http://www.culturewars.com/

Here are some more fun history essays not necessarily related to bolshevism but still interesting.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/07/22/the-cause-of-the-second-civil-war-in-america/

https://wethoughttheywerewhite.tumblr.com/WhoAreTheJews

Here's a write up to learn more about our movement.

https://katana17.wordpress.com/2016/09/04/the-daily-stormer-a-normies-guide-to-the-alt-right/


Happy cake day!

We shouldn't need science, since basic observation and understanding tells us everything we need to know, but cucks worship science as the new religion so it's useful to have on hand to hammer them with.

Some of the science, btw

“It is inaccurate to state that race is biologically meaningless.” Source: http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1435.html

Race is biologically real and represents “genetic clusters” of variation. Source: http://stx.sagepub.com/content/30/2/67.abstract

Humans can be genetically categorized into five racial groups, corresponding to traditional races. Source: http://pritchardlab.stanford.edu/publications/pdfs/RosenbergEtAl02.pdf

Genetic analysis “supports the traditional racial groups classification.” Source: http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

“Human genetic variation is geographically structured” and corresponds with race. Source: http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1435.html

Race can be determined via genetics with certainty for >99.8% of individuals. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15625622


Ethnocentrism is rational, biological, and genetic in origin. Source: http://www.pnas.org/content/108/4/1262.abstract

Babies demonstrate ethnocentrism before exposure to non-Whites. Source: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01138.x/full

Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin. Source: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~axe/research/AxHamm_Ethno.pdf

Races are extended families. Ethnocentrism is genetically rational. Source: http://www.amazon.com/The-Ethnic-Phenomenon-Pierre-Berghe/dp/0275927091

Ethnocentrism is biological in origin and a superior evolutionary strategy to altruism. Source: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

Humans are more altruistic to individuals who they are more closely related to. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17456276

People subconsciously prefer those who are genetically similar to them for biologically rational reasons. Source: http://www.psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/Genetic%20Similarity%201989.pdf

This is a great read on the topic of anti-protestant discrimination in the south post independence. It’s not hard to see why the ‘siege mentality’  was/is still so strong in the Protestant community after what happened there.

The Faithful Tribe by Ruth Edwards (an Irish Catholic) while focussing on the Orange Order is also a great insight into the general loyalist mindset & their history.

It's like asking why a woman would start a fight with her husband based on what seems like nothing in the eyes of the husband.

After the smoke has cleared and things have settled down, you can ask the woman why she started the fight, and she'll say "I don't know."

Now imagine if there existed an environment of evolutionary adaptedness which selected for women that exhibited a greater than average tendency towards this kind of fight-starting. In non-technical terms, imagine if these specific women had more babies than other women, and their babies also out-reproduced the next generation, and so forth.

Then imagine the kind of man that can succeed in an environment where the women are overwhelmingly domineering passive-aggressive gaslighters.

Surprise surprise, the men will turn out to be neurotic.

TLDR, don't assume "the Jews" really know why they support the policies they do.

Some of them really are consciously anti-white, but for a lot of them, it's just instinctive behavior.

https://imgur.com/rAKWdh8

(above is from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Feminists_by_ethnicity)

https://www.amazon.com/You-Never-Call-Write-History/dp/0195341430

If you really want to go deep on this subject, the authors are Kevin MacDonald and E. Michael Jones.

The Culture of Critique

The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit

A good summary of the origins of Australian Aborigines, as well as much of early human history, can be found in Before the Dawn by Nicholas Wade.

the source was The "Hitler Myth": Image and Reality in the Third Reich by Ian Kershaw.

From my understanding, Hitler did in fact serve in the army of the Bavarian Socialist Republic. To what degree is the question. Some people say he defected immediately. Others say he was sympathetic and only left later once things devolved. Either way, my point was that many Germans sympathized with the Communists, only to switch later to the Nazi side. This was very common- Communists becoming nazis. So jumping to the conclusion that Jews were responsible for this seems like a cheap tactic to dilute one's own responsibility while effectively blaming an out-group.

as for your other examples, I truthfully don't know enough about them to say. I know that Boas was allies with Margaret Mead, a White woman whose fame far outlasted his. typically, you'll notice that upon closer inspection many 'suspicious' scenarios involving Jews actually include Whites too. the question is then whether it's the Jewish person in charge (with a duped White ally), or the White person in charge (with a duped Jewish ally). or perhaps they're both involved as co-equals? hard to say. all I know is that under Kevin MacDonald's narrative, the Jew is always to blame no matter how extensive the support of the White person. this is a criticism that Nathan Cofnas just pointed out in his refutation.

just to give a contemporary example-- when it comes to Donald Trump, who is really the person responsible for his hardline immigration stance? is it Donald Trump, the White businessman? or is it Stephen Miller, the Jewish advisor? is Trump the frontman for Miller's policy ideas? or is Miller just another mouthpiece for the president in a cadre of anti-immigration activists? it's impossible to know. but imagine Trump was a far Left president instead of a far Right one, and imagine how the altright would interpret his actions. everything would be seen through his Jewish advisors, and he'd just be a pawn

Do you deny that the various races experienced different selective pressures over the last few hundred thousand years? If you accept this, do you also accept that evolution also works on humans as well.

BTW here is a book on recent human evolution

Which edition did you pick up?

Both are pretty thick, but apparently this one (926 pages) has a lot more notes

https://www.amazon.ca/Imperium-Philosophy-Francis-Parker-Yockey/dp/0956183573/

than this one (568 pages)

https://www.amazon.ca/Imperium-Philosophy-Francis-Parker-Yockey/dp/061550597X/

> The Tutsi and Hutu were ethnic groups/social classes within Rwanda, not the Congo. And Rwanda was under German control until 1916 when it was taken over by the Belgians, which was 7 years after Leopold II died.

I'll admit, I got my facts confused. I was just going off memory from what I learned from the film "Hotel Rwanda" and this book and it has been years since I read it.

I suppose I should have spent 5 minutes brushing up on my history before mentioning it.

But you're acting like you're somehow an expert when you obviously just went to Wikipedia and found the first thing you could find to debunk my claim...

The truth is still closer to my side. When the Belgians took over they implemented the ID card system which codified the ethnicities into a rigid caste system with the 1 percent Tutsis ruling over the 88 percent Hutus. This is what I was thinking of and I wrongly attributed it to Leopold. My bad.

But most historians trace the strife back to this action by the Belgians and I still stand by that position. There were divisions between the Hutus and the Tutsis prior, but people could move fairly freely between the ethnic groups. And there wasn't this intense hatred:

> The Hutu and Rwanda were not living in equality before European colonialism but major conflicts between the two ‘races’ didn’t occur until after European colonialism. The European “divide and conquer” strategy for dealing with native populations combined with the ‘scientific’ racism of the era gave motivation and reasoning for developing the divide between the Hutu and Tutsi. European colonialism directly created the animosity between the Hutu and Tutsi, through the subjugation of the Hutu and elevation of the Tutsi as well as the removal of any social mobility, that upon their subsequent withdrawal from the firestorm they created, they had put the country of Rwanda on the road to genocide.


And the use of ethnic ID cards provided a basis on which to carry out the genocide, i.e. you had lists of people who were designated Tutsi, much like you had people with Yellow Stars or Pink Triangles, designated Jews or Gays.

It is not exactly what you are asking for, but if you have not read it, you must read The Israel Lobby: https://www.amazon.com/Israel-Lobby-U-S-Foreign-Policy/dp/0374531501/

Theres this book about a african american who moves to africa, cant remember the name but its been mentioned here.

Edit: https://www.amazon.com/Out-America-Black-Confronts-Africa/dp/0465001882

Piggybacking off of this with these three pictures: (1, 2, 3).

I just started World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability, looks pretty based.

Sorry it's 'personality'

https://www.amazon.com/Authoritarian-Personality-Studies-Prejudice/dp/0393311120

once again, why didn't they just give more money to white couples to have more kids? instead they propagandized them to have fewer kids.

and here's a book by a jew conflating turks and jews in europe

and bolsheviks sparked ww2 by murdering german nationals. yes.

holocaust denial?

Like denying bear and eagle cages?
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=103945

and denying holocoasters?
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Inside-Concentration-Camps-Eyewitness-Accounts/dp/0275954471 with giant ovens and automatic robot oven doors? Page 132

The holocaust is awash with these level facts.
Should look into it some

https://www.amazon.com/Really-Need-Know-Learned-Kindergarten/dp/034546639X

People are taught to and bullied into, through a lifetime of propaganda, taking the side that is not their own.

Cast your mind back to your upbringing. Were you "so skeptical", then, about Whites asserting themselves and saying they have a place in this world?

> "Oh there just stupid, because they have low IQ." * they're

" The test has been debunked as a myth by scientist " sorry, just false.

"and even the Guinness Book of World Records, " lol

"Secondly, you also ignored the fact that Watson found that the variation between individuals of the same race is substantially larger than the difference between the averages for each race. "

...why would I ignore that? it contradicts nothing ive said.

"When to these factors a county's development sky-rockets."

False.

"just because you have a high IQ, it doesn't automatically translate towards success or usefulness."

who said otherwise?

"I've met numerous black people I KNOW are smart. Definitely smarter in some areas than both me and you."

speak for yourself please.

"W.E.B Du Bois? George Washington Carver? Dr. Daniel Hale Williams? Albert Turner Bharucha-Reid? Langston Hughes? Ralph Ellison? Fredrick Douglas? Sylvester James Gates? Shall I go on for 15 hours?"

john washington carver is what...like issac newton?

"I guess all those black scientist, artist, and philosophers I just listed are all outliers in the bell curve, right? But, wait can't the same be said for Newton, Einstein, Locke, Shakespeare, and Galileo? "

You would need to be stupid to think issac newton was not an outlier. what is your point? China, the middle east, india, and africa all had enough information available to them to produce calculus, the theory of gravity, newtonian mechanics, and optics. but they didnt. the person who did happen to produce those things was white. And that is not unusual in history. I know it hurts your soul but the crushing horrible truth is simply that white people over and over again were responsible for the major breakthroughs in human knowledge...and only an insane sort of revisionist history could claim otherwise.

"What genes makes a person more genetically predisposed to kicking a fucking ball around or slapping a ping-pong ball. You can't be serious here dude."

I can be very serious. I suggest you take a glance at the theory of genetics.

" Do you know any actual classical musicians? "

I am a classical pianist.

"How? Prove this."

https://www.amazon.com/IQ-Wealth-Nations-Richard-Lynn/dp/027597510X

"Explain how America is so successful when its racial make-up is so diverse when compared to other success countries?" It used to be less diverse.

>Guns were fine pre-brown invasion. The gun violence problem is directly and indirectly because of the Browns. They are committing most of the violence and brown diversity is a black cloud over all of society that creates despondence and erodes social trust everywhere.

Only partially true. Yes, the increased racial diversity in our society is contributing to the lack of social trust, as proven by Robert Putnam's work - which in turn is corrupting the morality and mental health of White people. But White culture itself has gone to shit in America, as proven by Charles Murray's Coming Apart. Both of which were largely caused by Jews [1][2][3][4][5]. White people have been morally corrupted and demographically and economically assaulted by Jewish-backed intellectual movements like liberalism and neoconservatism, and so they're increasingly turning to despair by becoming drug addicts, committing suicide, and lashing out at our pozzed society by becoming mass shooters.

I am doing this last time, DePaid. Kolomoiskiy is old buddy of Jewish communist elite criminal group, who owned Ukraine in 90-s - he is a partner of brothers Surkis and their closes ally Viktor Medvedchuk. All this guys are still in bussines (one of Surkises may become VP of UEFA, imagine that). Their group has unofficial name Velikolepnaya Semerka - sorry no info in English about them, beside probably here - https://www.amazon.com/Red-Mafiya-Robert-I-Friedman/dp/0425186873 . Russian president Vladimir Putin is the godfather of Medvedchuk's daughter Darina (born in 2004). Again. Russian president Vladimir Putin is the godfather of Medvedchuk's daughter Darina (born in 2004). Medvedchuk is the closest business partner of Kolomoisyi. Is that clear?

Kolomoiskiy is just a false flag for paranoid idiots like you, who have no idea what the fuck is going on for real.

I told all you - Ukraine is the key for understanding the real situation.