(Part 3) Top products from r/EndlessWar
We found 16 product mentions on r/EndlessWar. We ranked the 53 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the products ranked 41-60. You can also go back to the previous section.
41. To End All Wars: A Story of Loyalty and Rebellion, 1914-1918
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
Mariner Books
42. Devil Dog: The Amazing True Story of the Man Who Saved America (Pulp History)
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
43. What Jesus Meant
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
Used Book in Good Condition
44. The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
45. Blood Brothers: The Dramatic Story of a Palestinian Christian Working for Peace in Israel
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
46. Logics of War: Explanations for Limited and Unlimited Conflicts (Cornell Studies in Security Affairs)
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
Used Book in Good Condition
47. A Peace to End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
Used Book in Good Condition
48. Blowback, Second Edition: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire (American Empire Project)
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
importance of blowback in US foreign policy
51. Kill Chain: The Rise of the High-Tech Assassins
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
> [Top 7 Bible Verses About The Military] (http://www.patheos.com/blogs/christiancrier/2016/03/17/top-7-bible-verses-about-military/#jxuXSLrlzGTVmHDQ.99)
> John 15:13 “Greater love has no one than this, that someone lay down his life for his friends.”
> > [Logics of War: Explanations for Limited and Unlimited Conflicts] (https://www.amazon.com/Logics-War-Explanations-Unlimited-Conflicts/dp/0801451868) Page. 147 Para. 3
> > Overall, then, this case fits the commitment problem arguments well. The British had a clear preventive motivation for war, and consistent with that motivation they pursued large war aims that they were reluctant to abandon even in the face of military and diplomatic setbacks. As with the Argentines in the Paraguayan War, however, the Russians wanted to do exactly what the British feared and hence understood the British motivation for fighting. Given this understanding, they had no need to resort to a dispositional explanation for British policy and hence remained open to negotiation throughout the war.
> > > I don't know what keeps these guys going. For me, it's an electric rod within the fragile fibers of the heart. A faith in the things not seen, and a love mid the Bible's truth. Let the Holy Spirit speak wisdom whispers: straight from Torah's all-alive pages. If anyone tears up a Bible, they're doing a disgrace to God. Yah loves us as adopted heirs, and expects that we'll conform continually. So, have supernatural confidence … always bearing your foot upon the Rock. Demons exist friends; alas wielding the full armory's arsenal forth of Ephesians. Trumpeting salvation midst a sea of fiery darts that seemingly bounce back through the Advocate's measure.
History's userface repeats itself within time's epoch. Similar themes etching forward; realizing emotional resolution requires prophecy materiality. And we've seen this ensuing through timely echoes, where something reminiscent keeps acting out its rear head. Ahh, like Nimrod's character revolving over long history course. Seemingly manifested throughout, reappearing as a new ego. Weirdly enough, aliens appear ... man must defend territory after Lamb. Telling extent Genesis occupies many men's minds, never really fully aware nor too attuned towards symbolism's outreaches. Idealism's politically ideological supergroup shan't stand on two rubber points, as it'd decay surely. Universalism recognizes every party, only once discarding individuality. It is an anti Rand world reality, hence everyone's tolerable mentality cues ruin. Secularists' participation therefore suggests Christianity's background impositions (influences). Now, not each amid nation states' play role; eagle's protect isolated between Adonai's supernatural appointment. Thus, throw those dice rolls: see how chaos theory shapes picture. And it has, but the Codex hasn't gotten mixed into that spoil, alive and also continually dispersing salvation's fine salt. Particulars considered, America compels that it'll take upon good will or it'd fall down, akin with nude [material] exposure. Drunken asunder beyond inward gates rather just per Trojan horse. Strategy thencely implies pursuit of an aftermath constantly committed to Al. Maintain vitality's integral oneness and let Yah keep rest. Prayer always among the best strategic arsenals. Beating physical manpower, showcased during David's journey. Use our resources improperly and we'll become chased around borders subsequent perpetuity's silent storm. Spiritual warfare carrying credence whereby actively brought round world's zoning. Mutually entering prayership cascading (sprinkling) dominoes somewhere differently. Christ lining faithful persons as of befitting valuation. Howbeit, melding together as a singular company poses force. Masculinity's decisiveness should secure swift intent. Withal gentle wisdom, as is scripturally accordant. Question choices, however intuitively dispense gifts [that were] given. Deliverer's blessings paving peace access.
There is a terrific book about the machinations of Great Britain and France to use WWI to break up the Ottoman Empire and grab the Middle East, that explains in fascinating detail how we got into our present mess. Check it out
A Peace to End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East
i read the graphic novel biography.......
https://www.amazon.com/Devil-Dog-Amazing-America-History/dp/1439109028
Amazon link to the book he's referring to.
And might I suggest another book on the topic? This one is written by a former US State Dept. historian: Killing Hope: U.S. Military and C.I.A. Interventions Since World War II.
> If there was an October Surprise, it was all GHW Bush. Reagan was oblivious.
Reagan suffered from alzheimers/dementia late in his presidency, but in 1980 he was as an experienced, professional politician and was sharp as a tack. It is highly likely he would have known -- Reagan was a traitor but he was no idiot.
There is no doubt there was an October surprise -- the traitors Reagan and Bush worked to undermine the policies of a sitting US president (Carter) with a hostile foreign power (Iran) to keep American diplomats and USMC guards held hostage to swing the American election -- the evidence for that is overwhelming.
Consider these events:
Again, that's just the key parts of the evidence off the top of my head. Read Gary Sick's book and other sources.
The evidence that Reagan and Bush were traitors is overwhelming -- it's much stronger than the evidence that the traitor Richard Nixon colluded with the Taiwanese and South Vietnamese (an act resulting in hundreds of US soldiers dying) to undermine LBJ's foreign policies and win the 1968 presidential election.
Edit: Typos, clarity.
> "I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and my best intentions still tell me that's true -- but the facts and the evidence tell me it is not." -- US President Ronald Reagan, 4 March 1987.