Top products from r/GGFreeForAll

>No, until something can be shown to make a significant difference, gestures such as these don't count. They are great PR and really not much more.

Please quantify "significant difference."

Sounds to me like you want people living in impoverished communities with subpar access to education and resources to do what academics and PhDs working for the government have failed to do after decades of research on intervention programs.

>Every quote given talks about uniting, and the only one that gives any context to what they are uniting for is in support of BLM.

BLM is never even directly mentioned. Or is everyone who is upset about the police killings of young black men now part of BLM whether they like it or not?

And here's a bunch of lines that have nothing to do with uniting against the police:

>Ben “Taco” Owens, who supervises gang-intervention workers at a local nonprofit, told the group that he believes “that you’re here because you want to change.”

>“This is a very, very critical moment in our city and in our lives,” he said, adding that  two people were killed in Gardena, where he is from, in one week.

>Michael “Big Mike” Cummings, a gang-intervention worker in Watts, said he is “sick and tired of losing our babies.”

>"The only thing that needs to be divided by colors is our laundry,” he said.

>After the event, Dom Black, a 22-year-old who was raised in the surrounding neighborhood of Westmont, stood outside the church. Black said he has been beat up and shot at in his community and wants to see a change.

>"I came out here because I feel like the change starts inside,” he said.

But--let me guess--those don't count.

>The idea that these people are actually going to unite over 'black lives' is hilarious. If they gave even 2 fucks about their fellow blacks then they wouldn't be killing them over corners and 'respect'.

So everyone in this black community is a gang member and a murderer?

>Show me a shred of anything that shows that actual change is going to come from such a PR stunt.

No one can predict the future, but, if you want evidence that change could come from this, try this book.

>I mean it was held in a Church of Scientology building ffs. You really think they are doing that out of the goodness of their hearts?

Lmao. You're criticizing them for the building they're using, really? That was probably the only building they could get on such a short notice that was also big enough to fit everyone and wouldn't require people to travel far to get to.

>Then I'd be breaking the first rule of debate. You have to provide your own sources.

I'm honestly not sure what you want. I gave you a relatively easy to digest source on the matter and that upset you. But now, when I point you to longer texts that you obviously also won't touch, those will upset you too:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/European-Football-Black-White-Tackling/dp/0739119605/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1465573520&sr=1-1&keywords=racism+football

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Racism-Anti-Racism-Football-Jon-Garland/dp/0333730798/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1465573520&sr=1-2&keywords=racism+football

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Changing-Face-Football-Identity-Multiculture/dp/1859734839/ref=sr_1_3?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1465573520&sr=1-3&keywords=racism+football

Was your intention to give me a task that you would never be satisfied with my completion of? Kinda getting that feeling.

>It was a list of football events where "racism" took place.

You read the introduction! Congratulations.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Homophobia-Byrne-Fone/dp/0312420307/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1463861465&sr=1-1&keywords=homophobia

>Fone reveals how and why same-sex desire has long been the object of legal, social, religious, and political persecution.

From 2001.

When when this is infinitely better?

It's not exactly a new concept.

Guess this guy is pretty big in the alt-right for writing this book.

Maybe you should educate yourself. Now excuse me while I pleasure my waifu in VR because real women lie about being raped.

this is not a review, this is an excerpt from a book

(a book that crowdfunded a whoppping 1.6k lol)

gamergate: still not knowing what a review is all these years later

>Words change. Words mean different things in different places.

Nothing creepy and Orwellian about that, nope, nuh uh

That's not proof of anything...

http://www.amazon.com/Resurrection-Alien-Documentaries-P-D-Kalnay/dp/0994027745/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1463845491&sr=1-1&keywords=documentary+aliens

https://www.amazon.com/Peoples-History-United-States/dp/0060838655

Only because you haven't experienced the joys of aebleskiver. I need an aebleskiver pan so I can make some. This one looks good.

> You can just shake your head in disbelief that this moron would want to teach the alphabet with such bullshit.

I didn't watch the video, but did you actually look at the book?

Seems like a fine way to teach the alphabet, just like A is for America or whatever.

You turds really need to up your outrage game. This is pathetic.

Oh shit is this the cavalry? Is it the phone a friend round of the retard olympics?

>refuses to read material when linked

I assure you I read all the material that was linked at this url
http://www.amazon.com/Feminist-Theory-From-Margin-Center/dp/0896086135

For example I read this review

>I was saddened to read how boring and uninterested the author made the topic of feminism to be. I rented this book for one of my college courses, which I'm so thankful I only rented it because its def not worth purchasing. I did not enjoy how scattered and uneasy the material is to understand while reading. I have requested my college to restrain from using this text as part of the class curriculum.

It certainly sounds similar to the criticisms alot of feminists have of Anita's work.

Good job being wrong "bro".

This will make the third feminist theory on the topic of patriarchy I'll have read and dissected within 24 hours, but I guess when I'm done with Sherlock I'll give it a squizz. I'll probably even make it it's own post.

>reading her is worth your time in any regard

I am highly dubious, but we'll see.

> Oh, you mean like the multitude of times I've asked people in this very thread to define what they think patriarchy is? Can I get you to follow me around and suggest I do things I've already done all the time?

no I literally meant what I said. when you say stuff like "patriarchy is a third wave feminist concept" it reveals that you don't have any idea what you're talking about and are either lying about taking a gender studies class or slept through the entire thing

> I wouldn't describe Sarkeesian that way, but you can if you want.

I was talking about this actually https://www.reddit.com/r/GGFreeForAll/comments/3yxs6x/is_the_patriarchy_the_ultimate_conspiracy_theory/cyhmafb

> For example, rather than bitch and moan about how bad you think my handle on third wave feminism or "the patriarchy" is, why not use what you perceive as my shortcoming to help educate myself and the wider audience on the subject.

here ya go buddy http://www.amazon.com/Feminist-Theory-From-Margin-Center/dp/0896086135