Top products from r/GameTheorists

> you clearly havent seen in online gaming groups if you think people would take bad graphics, belive me.

yes these players exist, but they are in a heavy minority. There are much more players who don't care about graphics and want good games(fun games, good story, good gameplay, ...).

> the stuff with the 3ds and wii u the only games you saw most the features deployed (and to an extent in the wii) were first party games because they were so closed off which i agree is dumb but with the switch hopfully as they have anounced several 3rd party devs they will be able to use the hardware better and make games for it

just remember, when the Wii U was announced, there also were many third party titles announced.

> also side note not all computers work the same way so it would be easier and better if developers didnt do pc cause its a harder platform (as different hardware configureations) vs console where its minor tweaks between 1 and 1s plus the 4 and 4pro.

yes, but for consoles the hard thing isn't the options you need, it's the console itself. Programers normally work on the PC and it is way easier to test that directly on the PC than to copy it over on to a console and then testing it there. And they have to repeat that, everytime they want to test something, which often happens hundreds or even thousands of times. Whereas creating different graphics settings doesn't need that much testing and can be done on one and the same system for all settings.

> you dont need the pro controller and your assuming that the controlers arent comfortable yet i seen people who went to the event say they were fine.

Yeah, I never had them in my hands so I don't really know how they are. I've heard that they are fine but the pro controller still feels much better, especially for people with big hands.

> the online unless they plan on doing worse version of PS+ then there shouldn't be anything wrong with it.

From what I've heard, it is going to be pretty expensive without giving you that much stuff. You will get NES and SNES games you can play for one month and after that, you would have to buy them.

> also wheres your source on the games price or are you making a guess based on the rest of current gen?

OK, they are 60€, but still, they shouldn't be that expensive.

here some sources:

• Mario Kart 8 - Deluxe It's just a port with a few extra features, not an entirely new game.
  
• ARMS It's not such a huge game.
  
• Splatoon 2 It's just a port with a few extra features, not an entirely new game.
  
• (TLoZ Breath of the Wild, TES V Skyrim and SM Odyssey are understandable because they are pretty big games)
  
• and then there is 1-2 Switch for 50€ instead of being included if you buy the console(like it was with Wii Sports).

You should read this book. It's great and is quite deep. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Cubeworld-Minecraft-Novel-Karl-Olsberg/dp/1490448853

>Is this one even longer?!

Not sure.

>Don't make me slap down 5 pages of Japanese HH errors that I have buried here somewhere.

Go for it. Make this longer. Mmyesss.

>That isn't even logical reasoning. Zelda features heavy use of atavisms of characters, such as Beedle being in SS, WW and BotW. This happens with so many different characters. It is not unusual for the Zelda Universe to have things appear all over the timelines, especially when those things appeared before the split.

That's kind of the whole point of that quote, my dude. The Mogma DON'T appear in any other game, and neither does the Beetle item. He's saying it would seem as though Skyward Sword should take place at a later time because it contains people and items that aren't seen in "future" titles, but it's not a contradiction because that's the way Zelda games are built. They don't consider the overall story until after they've sussed out what gameplay mechanics they want to feature.

>I’d like to ask everyone just to enjoy the book and to be broad-minded,
>
>Agree, because it isn't a book of fact.

Yeah, that's called being narrow-minded.

>Hero's Shade isn't the HoT and is never claimed to be in the game. There is a ton of countering evidence against that idea. Even the HH says that it is simply a fan theory. Kaepora Gaebora is definitely not Rauru. OoT's gossip stone says that he is simply the reincarnation of an ancient sage. You do realize that Rauru wasn't the only ancient sage, right?

Except you just acknowledged that you think Gramps is the Hero of Legend, and that's not confirmed in the game either. Hence my comment asking if you need everything spelled out verbatim. The Hero's Shade is most definitely the Hero of Time, there are in-game quotes supporting that. He can only pass his techniques down to one of the "Hero's Blood," and he calls you "my child." Plus, dude's left-handed. Not coincidences.

Kaepora Gaebora is definitely Rauru, and they're both related to Gaebora in some fashion or another. I'm personally of a mind that Gaebora is the one who builds the Temple of Time over the Sealed Temple from Skyward Sword, explaining both the location of the Master Sword in Ocarina of Time and the abilities of the Door of Time. He takes the name Rauru, for whatever reason (could be his first name.) Rauru being a Hylian and an "Ancient Sage," he's clearly no longer "alive," per se, considering Hylians don't live to be over a hundred. ;P

Other incarnations of Zelda's Father/King of Hyrule have shown the ability to live on after Death as a spirit capable of changing form, i.e. the King of Red Lions and King Rhoam Bosphoramus Hyrule, at the very least. Kaepora Gaebora is simply a physical manifestation Rauru chooses to watch over Link, projecting himself out of the Sacred Realm. Like Gaepora's Eyebrows, Rauru's Moustache, and Kaepora Gaebora's whole head and name aren't correlated. Pssha.

>Mmmmmnnnn, no... I think you're confusing the words "higher" and "unrealistic."
>
>Every fact should come from in-game evidence. The books make up stuff that cannot be rectified with the games. They even admit to doing so. If a person can't post a screenshot from the game that supports what they say, then it is that doodoo.

Like I said, unrealistic. Also, no fun. Zero whatsoever. Gotta broaden that mind, my dude.

>I already said that like 5 responses ago or something. The thing can be manifested after the fact.

I'm not disagreeing that point. I'm disagreeing that the mark would have to be visible on Gramps' left hand to prove he's the Hero of Legend, but we already agreed on that point. I was just irritated you were using that picture as proof that the mark is permanent because Ganondorf's was visible, but ignored the fact that Link's was absent.

>There can be multiple incarnations of malice. But Demise is dead and gone. He is simply a part of the Demon Tribe's curse himself, same as Dorf and Vaati, etc. Besides, Ganondorf is way more powerful than Demise anyway, even before he gets the Triforce of Power.

Well that's pure conjecture... but also:

"You stand as a paragon of your kind, human. You fight like no man or demon I have ever known. Though this is not the end. My hate... never perishes. It is born anew in a cycle with no end! I will rise again! Those like you... Those who share the blood of the goddess and the spirit of the hero... They are eternally bound to this curse. An incarnation of my hatred shall ever follow your kind, dooming them to wander a blood-soaked sea of darkness for all time!"

"The source of the darkness that has appeared time and again throughout Hyrule's history. It's been called many names, from "Great King of Evil" to "Calamity." Hibernating within a cocoon, it attempted to regenerate a physical form after Link awoke but was forced to confront him in an incomplete state."

Like, there's a reason Ganondorf is called the "Demon King" despite being Gerudo. He's just another manifestation of Demise's hatred. The whole point of Skyward Sword was to provide a partial explanation of the "heavy use of atavisms."

>Hero's Shade is 99% not HoT. Every 'proof' that says he is falls short of being undeniable, and there are a lot of holes with that theory, but that's another thread.

Disagree. Nothing for it though.

>No, it's not the tactic that's crafty, it's the people who could argue you because you said too much and trapped yourself that are. You'll remember this convo if/when it happens to you and will know what I'm talking about.

I'm not sure I'm picking up what you're putting down, but I am ESL. "people who could argue (with) you because you" is what you meant, I think... Eh, like I said, I prefer honest mistakes to crafty douchebaggery.

>It wasn't an answer; it was information. Listing the existing evidence on a topic is not equivalent to taking a stance. I did enjoy spanking you, too. In a totally platonic way.

Pedant. Also, pervert. Even if you didn't "take a stance," you still provided "evidence" from a different era, and then attempted to chastise me for disproving your evidence with an example from a different era, and then called me a hypocrite for it, ya dick. It's like you threw a banana peel to trip me, slipped on it yourself, and called me a klutz.

>Clit? I thought it was a diugh earlier? Or perhaps it is a peen the size of clit? It's that one, isn't it?

Had to google that. If I said something to the effect of "suck my dick" earlier, it was hyperbolic. The only penises I own are artificial. <<I searched my overview page, I don't think I did say anything to that effect. Might be a Freudian slip on your part. :P >>

>You did the same thing everyone does; come in with a smarty-tude. These people are out for blood. They wanna see someone get knocked down. Every single one of them had the same experience. They just stuck it out. Why don't you jump in those comments and tear someone's theory apart? Be sure to bring evidence.

I mean, I kind of acknowledged that already. "Foaming at the mouth," and "incels" and all that. I get laid on the regular, I don't need to put other people down to reach climax. ;)

>PSSSST!!! <<It's possible to have disagreements without being an aggressive douchebag.>> :F
>
>That's what I'm telling you.

I mean, "out for blood" and "tear someone's theory apart" sound pretty aggressive to me.

>Geography isn't my specialty. Creation, lore, symbols and OoT in general is.

.............. Then why'd you shit all over my theory about geography, my dude? Rude.

>I'm just... Saiyan.
>
>Where's your tail, then?

It's not exactly a monkey tail, but here's one of several that I own. :D

I feel they gave their explaination in the security guard scene. When the boyfriend noticed the screensaver and asks if she was making an educated guess. My assumption is that her brain tries desperately to make sense of things and just clicks things together, like how when people wake up from a dream; or how at the end she appears to comes up with something the same way she makes the connections that theres a conspiracy around her father's murder. Reminds me of Blink

I think the idea is that she is just making inferences. I think the point is to make it easier to empathize with how a schizophrenic would have difficulty recognizing reality even when they know their sick. I think that's also part of why it's animated the way it is. Part real part fake; blurring lines between animated and live action. Was hoping the ending would've been things turning "real". Idk just my interpretation of it.