(Part 3) Top products from r/JusticePorn

Jump to the top 20

We found 20 product mentions on r/JusticePorn. We ranked the 76 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the products ranked 41-60. You can also go back to the previous section.

Next page

Top comments that mention products on r/JusticePorn:

u/SgtMustang · 5 pointsr/JusticePorn

It might seem surprising, but its true. If you read modern literature or papers on sleep you'll find that the consensus is that energy conservation is not the purpose of sleep.

Pulled from first paragraph on Wikipedia:


"Sleep is sometimes thought to help conserve energy, though this theory is not fully adequate as it only decreases metabolism by about 5–10%. Additionally it is observed that mammals require sleep even during the hypometabolic state of hibernation, in which circumstance it is actually a net loss of energy as the animal returns from hypothermia to euthermia in order to sleep.

Sleep is a heightened anabolic state, accentuating the growth and rejuvenation of the immune, nervous, skeletal and muscular systems."

This book is a relatively easy read and has a few sections dedicated to modern-day debate of sleep: http://www.amazon.com/Brain-Rules-Principles-Surviving-Thriving/dp/0979777747

u/cognitive-dissonance · 4 pointsr/JusticePorn

>I'm talking like, 'dawn of man' era, not a post-french revolution state.

The "dawn of man" era is what Hobbes and his predecessors refer to as the "state of nature". Even though Hobbes is writing during the 17th century, he is concerned with establishing how the very first political organizations formed out of the state of nature. Essentially Hobbes is saying that primitive man would make a rational choice to give up a few rights to secure others. Even if you are a primitive man you can realize the benefits of increasing your security through political organization.

It has been a while since I have read the Leviathan so don't take my brief account of what he says as correct. You can read the whole thing for free on the internet http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/hobbes/leviathan-a.html#CHAPTERI. However, it is somewhat of a tough read because of the outdated language. Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia is a much more modern book that addresses your concern in the first chapter. It is also one the most influential books of the 20th century. http://www.amazon.com/Anarchy-State-Utopia-Robert-Nozick/dp/0465097200

>religion was good.

It very well might of been, but I'm just saying that there are aslo other very good reasons to form political organizations and laws.

u/TheRipePunani · 10 pointsr/JusticePorn

Aye, this just reminded me of a book I just finished reading. It's called Sergeant Rex and it's about a military working dog and his handler, Mike Dowling and their experiences when they were deployed with the USMC in Iraq. Very good read, if you're a dog lover and interested in military books, I suggest anyone and everyone to check it out. It's given me a whole new appreciation for working dogs and just dogs in general.

http://www.amazon.com/Sergeant-Rex-Unbreakable-Between-Military/dp/1451635966

u/internet-is-a-lie · 1 pointr/JusticePorn

http://www.amazon.com/Mega-Memory-Kevin-Trudeau/dp/0743530284

Definitely not questioning your story, but I am VERY skeptical. Sounds like an awesome product if it indeed does work.

u/snumfalzumpa · 2 pointsr/JusticePorn

honestly if that intrigues you, you should really read Suburban Nation. it's a fantastic book.

u/JonMcClane · 1 pointr/JusticePorn

For a good read on the stigma against mental health, please read Crazy by Pete Earley.

u/buschdogg · 4 pointsr/JusticePorn

You're a fucking idiot.

You have nothing but ignorant assumptions that are mostly incorrect. You really sound like an awful human being from the two replies I got from you, to be honest.

Why don't you read this and get back at me: http://www.amazon.com/Three-Felonies-Day-Target-Innocent/dp/1594035229

u/Deradius · 7 pointsr/JusticePorn

You are not the first. It's an interesting book, if you haven't read it.

u/stephen89 · 2 pointsr/JusticePorn

As I said, I actually have the equipment at home now and my brother helps me out with my program. I am using one of Rippetoe's starting strength routines and it is exactly as you described. Approx 45 minutes a day on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. I think I am going to throw 20 minutes of running/biking in on the Tuesdays and Thursdays.

u/chungmoolah · 3 pointsr/JusticePorn

Also, he wrote a book called Semper Cool after the incident so there's that going for him.

u/wikipediabrown007 · 3 pointsr/JusticePorn

Honestly read Michel Foucault's Discipline & Punish. It will change forever the way you see punishment.

u/Jondayz · 11 pointsr/JusticePorn

For sure, because it's dangerous. But you can buy snap caps and do it in your house or find an outdoor range to practice for real.

u/socrates114 · 2 pointsr/JusticePorn

haha youre just being dumb and contrarian you really think all of a sudden its acceptable for girls to be violent to people in public? Its just lower class culture, its always been like that There have been female gangs since forever. Look up the Asian Killer girls, innocent bitch killers, the wally girls, Lady Rascals all just all female asian gangs, not including all female latina or black gangs all according to Professor ( and former cop Al Valdez on the decrease probably due to better opportunities for women in today society and i live in socal so I see girl gangs or rather used to see them Source: I am taking a class on gangs right now. See Al Valdez "Gangs: a guide to understanding street gangs." Youre the one who was saying the other guy was generalizing about humanity then make unsourced claims that because media existed this stuff would be covered but in some ways it was and some ways it wasnt.


http://www.amazon.com/Gangs-Guide-Understanding-Street-Edition/dp/1563250780/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1344972275&sr=8-1&keywords=al+valdez

u/TheGreenLanyard · 2 pointsr/JusticePorn

Through the "read other people's comments" approach, it's easy to criticize someone by exclusively choosing comments that criticize them.

It's quite possible for Fox to choose only comments that were biased towards one side and never focus on any specific claims made in the content of the book.

You can find a variety of comments just by looking at Amazon book reviews: http://www.amazon.com/Zealot-Life-Times-Jesus-Nazareth/product-reviews/140006922X

That one would look at the wide variety of comments available on the Internet and choose comments that attack credibility through ad hominem (Aslan is Muslim, therefore his book is biased) and appeal to authority (another scholar disagrees, therefore Aslan is wrong), instead of focusing on the content of the book (e.g. why couldn't the disagreeing scholar's comment include what example claim (s)he disagrees with and why (s)he disagrees?)...they just don't make for a balanced interview.

u/HittingSmoke · 0 pointsr/JusticePorn

> You were implying that I said "their" content referring to black people. I wasn't. The sarcastic sentence in all caps was making fun of your stupid racist joke.

Well I can see where your head's at. Maybe you should reflect on your own racist thoughts if that's the place you take that sentence.

Also, only $16 used. You really should pick one up.

Holy fucking shit I can't even believe this conversation just happened. Learn to fucking read, dipshit.