(Part 2) Top products from r/MensRights

> To my knowledge reasons like this one don't exist for female circumcision.

Not true, or at least very debatable. Science has show us...

Note: I am against ALL genital mutilation of females, males and intersex. Please don't interpret this post as supporting any of these activities.

Everything I have posted below is factual; but it's supposed to be ironic and educational - to help folks clear up their confused thinking around this issue. Thanks

Genital Autonomy for all - Intersex, Male & Female

If the amputation of the mucus membranes of the male genitals results in a lowering of HIV infection; then it would not be unreasonable to assume that the amputation of the mucus membranes of the female genitals would produce the same effect. Indeed, as the total surface area of mucus membranes in females is so much greater than that of males, the effect may be even greater.

However, most western peoples will be repulsed by the idea of amputating parts of an infant female's genitals to obtain some future protection from a disease. All the more so, when nearly 100% protection can be obtain from HIV infection by use of condoms.

But this repulsion does not arise when the prospect of amputating parts of infant male genitals. This is clearly because such activity has become "normalised" in the west. This is the issue.

Like male circumcision, there are plenty of peer reviewed studies that show female circumcision is not a barrier to sexual orgasm and enjoyment. Some studies show that orgasm and enjoyment are reduced; and some show no effect.

You'll often come across members of the medical community saying that FGM has no "health" benefits, and if women have their clitoris amputated, then their sex life comes to an end. Then they say that MGM has lots of "health" benefits and that men's sex life is not affected.

But it's a myth that many women who have suffered FGM are unhappy and cannot have great sex lives. That's why they queue up to have their daughters' circumcised. Plus there are many so-called potential "health benefits" - such as a 50% reduction in HIV/AIDS.

The visible part - the glans clitoris - is only a small part of the whole clitoris. So when a woman suffers partial or total amputation of the external clitoris when undergoing FGM, only a small part of her clitoris is removed. Thus she often can enjoy a full and satisfying sex life.

The truth about the female clitoris

Learn how large the female clitoris is; and how the external glans clitoris is just a small part of it:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/28/cliteracy_n_3823983.html
http://womenshealth.about.com/cs/sexuality/a/clitoraltruthin.htm

http://www.amazon.com/The-Clitoral-Truth-Secret-Fingertips/dp/1583224734

Female Circumcision & Health Benefits

"Stallings et al. (2005) reported that, in Tanzanian women,
the risk of HIV among women who had undergone FGC
was roughly half that of women who had not; the association
remained significant after adjusting for region, household
wealth, age, lifetime partners, union status, and recent ulcer."

Note: when it's found that circumcising female genitals reduces HIV/AIDS it's called a "conundrum" rather that a wonderfully exciting "medical" opportunity to reduces HIV/AIDS.

http://www.iasociety.org/Default.aspx?pageId=11&abstractId=2177677

"Georgia State University, Public Health Theses" — a USA University of international renown:

The Association between Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) and the Risk of HIV/AIDS in Kenyan Girls and Women (15-49 Years):

"RESULTS: This study shows an inverse association (OR=0.508; 95% CI: 0.376-0.687) between FGM and HIV/AIDS, after adjusting for confounding variables."

"DISCUSSION: The inverse association between FGM and HIV/AIDS established in this study suggests a possible protective effect of female circumcision against HIV/AIDS. This finding suggests therefore the need to authenticate this inverse association in different populations and also to determine the mechanisms for the observed association."

"This study investigated whether there is a direct association between FGM and HIV/AIDS. Surprisingly, the results indicated that the practice of FGM turned out to reduce the risk of HIV. While a positive association was hypothesized, a surprising inverse association between cases of female circumcision and positive HIV serostatus was obtained, hence indicating that FGM may have protective properties against the transmission of HIV."

http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1113&context=iph_theses

"National Bureau of Statistics, Tanzania - 50% reduction in HIV/AIDS in women who have have parts of the genitals amputated:"

http://www.tzonline.org/pdf/femalecircumcisionandhivinfectionintanzania.pdf


"International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:

Female genital cutting in this group of women did not attenuate sexual feelings:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01550.x/abstract

"The Journal of Sexual Medicine" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:

Pleasure and orgasm in women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C):

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17970975

"The New Scientist" (references a medical journal)

Female Circumcision Does Not Reduce Sexual Activity:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2837-female-circumcision-does-not-reduce-sexual-activity.html#.Uml2H2RDtOQ

"Journal of General Internal Medicine" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:

Female "Circumcision" - African Women Confront American Medicine

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1497147/

Medical benefits of female circumcision: Dr. Haamid al-Ghawaabi

http://islamqa.info/en/ref/45528

"Pediatrics (AAP)" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:

Genital Cutting Advocated By American Academy Of Pediatrics

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/102/1/153.short

Genital Autonomy for all - Intersex, Male & Female

> females who have had their clitoris remove, cannot have a clitoral orgasm

> case closed

Nope. Case open again:

Note: I am against ALL genital mutilation of females, males and intersex. Please don't interpret this post as supporting any of these activities.

Everything I have posted below is factual; but it's supposed to be educational - to help folks clear up their confused thinking around this issue. Thanks

Genital Autonomy for all - Intersex, Male & Female

If the amputation of the mucus membranes of the male genitals results in a lowering of HIV infection; then it would not be unreasonable to assume that the amputation of the mucus membranes of the female genitals would produce the same effect. Indeed, as the total surface area of mucus membranes in females is so much greater than that of males, the effect may be even greater.

However, most western peoples will be repulsed by the idea of amputating parts of an infant female's genitals to obtain some future protection from a disease. All the more so, when nearly 100% protection can be obtain from HIV infection by use of condoms.

But this repulsion does not arise when the prospect of amputating parts of infant male genitals. This is clearly because such activity has become "normalised" in the west. This is the issue.

Like male circumcision, there are plenty of peer reviewed studies that show female circumcision is not a barrier to sexual orgasm and enjoyment. Some studies show that orgasm and enjoyment are reduced; and some show no effect.

You'll often come across members of the medical community saying that FGM has no "health" benefits, and if women have their clitoris amputated, then their sex life comes to an end. Then they say that MGM has lots of "health" benefits and that men's sex life is not affected.

But it's a myth that many women who have suffered FGM are unhappy and cannot have great sex lives. That's why they queue up to have their daughters' circumcised. Plus there are many so-called potential "health benefits" - such as a 50% reduction in HIV/AIDS.

The visible part - the glans clitoris - is only a small part of the whole clitoris. So when a woman suffers partial or total amputation of the external clitoris when undergoing FGM, only a small part of her clitoris is removed. Thus she often can enjoy a full and satisfying sex life.

The truth about the female clitoris

Learn how large the female clitoris is; and how the external glans clitoris is just a small part of it:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/28/cliteracy_n_3823983.html
http://womenshealth.about.com/cs/sexuality/a/clitoraltruthin.htm

http://www.amazon.com/The-Clitoral-Truth-Secret-Fingertips/dp/1583224734

Female Circumcision & Health Benefits

"Stallings et al. (2005) reported that, in Tanzanian women,
the risk of HIV among women who had undergone FGC
was roughly half that of women who had not; the association
remained significant after adjusting for region, household
wealth, age, lifetime partners, union status, and recent ulcer."

Note: when it's found that circumcising female genitals reduces HIV/AIDS it's called a "conundrum" rather that a wonderfully exciting "medical" opportunity to reduces HIV/AIDS.

http://www.iasociety.org/Default.aspx?pageId=11&abstractId=2177677

"Georgia State University, Public Health Theses" — a USA University of international renown:

The Association between Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) and the Risk of HIV/AIDS in Kenyan Girls and Women (15-49 Years):

"RESULTS: This study shows an inverse association (OR=0.508; 95% CI: 0.376-0.687) between FGM and HIV/AIDS, after adjusting for confounding variables."

"DISCUSSION: The inverse association between FGM and HIV/AIDS established in this study suggests a possible protective effect of female circumcision against HIV/AIDS. This finding suggests therefore the need to authenticate this inverse association in different populations and also to determine the mechanisms for the observed association."

"This study investigated whether there is a direct association between FGM and HIV/AIDS. Surprisingly, the results indicated that the practice of FGM turned out to reduce the risk of HIV. While a positive association was hypothesized, a surprising inverse association between cases of female circumcision and positive HIV serostatus was obtained, hence indicating that FGM may have protective properties against the transmission of HIV."

http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1113&context=iph_theses

"National Bureau of Statistics, Tanzania - 50% reduction in HIV/AIDS in women who have have parts of the genitals amputated:"

http://www.tzonline.org/pdf/femalecircumcisionandhivinfectionintanzania.pdf

Female Circumcision Does not Reduce Sexual Experiences

"International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:

Female genital cutting in this group of women did not attenuate sexual feelings:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01550.x/abstract

"The Journal of Sexual Medicine" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:

Pleasure and orgasm in women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C):

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17970975

"The New Scientist" (references a medical journal)

Female Circumcision Does Not Reduce Sexual Activity:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2837-female-circumcision-does-not-reduce-sexual-activity.html#.Uml2H2RDtOQ

"Journal of General Internal Medicine" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:

Female "Circumcision" - African Women Confront American Medicine

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1497147/

Medical benefits of female circumcision: Dr. Haamid al-Ghawaabi

http://islamqa.info/en/ref/45528

"Pediatrics (AAP)" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:

Genital Cutting Advocated By American Academy Of Pediatrics

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/102/1/153.short

Genital Autonomy for all - Intersex, Male & Female

>Webster has the true definition of feminism.

Webster (and other dictionaries) have the claimed, dictionary definition of feminism, which is not even remotely close to how feminists really think and act.

>My dad is most certainly not a doormat. He and my mother treat each other as equals.

A man supporting feminism is like a black person supporting the KKK, or a jew supporting the nazis.

>Seriously, don't you see what you're doing?

I most certainly do.

>How do you feel when you tell someone you're a Men's Rights activist and they automatically assume you think this makes you better than women? You know that's not true.

If those women are feminists, then yes, I AM better than them. The same is true of male feminists as well.

>So why apply a similar stigma to a word that is, at its heart, the same as what you believe?

I am an antifeminist. Feminism is antithetical to my beliefs.



Feminism is a hate movement that for half a century has been Spreading Misandry, Legalizing Misandry, and Sanctifying Misandry. It has been actively waging a War Against Men and sadly even a War against Boys.

Someone put it here beautifully, iirc it was something like equality for women and nothing less, equality for men and nothing more.

I think it goes back way to the very start,

>Cultivate the frontal portion of her brain as much as that of man is cultivated, and she will stand his equal at least. Even now, where her mind has been called out at all, her intellect is as bright, as capacious, and as powerful as his.

• Ernestine Rose
  
  Most of them do recognize that this isn't true in the physical attributes of strength and athleticism(and the overcompensation with regards to mental aptitude seems to be related to this inferiority), however you'd still hear of some deluded ones talking of ultramarathons and then there are some who go the whole hog.
  
  >Can women be equal to men as long as men are physically stronger? And are men, in fact, stronger?
  These are key questions that Colette Dowling, author of the bestselling The Cinderella Complex, raises in her provocative new book. The myth of female frailty, with its roots in nineteenth-century medicine and misogyny, has had a damaging effect on women's health, social status, and physical safety. It is Dowling's controversial thesis that women succumb to societal pressures to appear weak in order to seem more "feminine."
  
  http://www.amazon.com/The-Frailty-Myth-Redefining-Potential/dp/0375758151

After being a conservative for my whole life, about 5 years ago I started moving toward the center. I now see my self as member of the centrist party. I will leave a link on that party below.

The best book I have read that paints a great picture of where feminism is today is by Warren Farrell "Women Can't Hear What Men Don't Say" Also Warren Farrell is a lefty.

Personally I am tired of everything in life being measured in Right or Left. Everyone is now looking through their perspective glasses and judging whether they can be friends with someone based on where they sit on the Right Left line. The attitude of "if you don't agree with me you need to be burned at the stake"

I desperately want the Men's Right Movement to work for all men no matter what their political beliefs. I also want to work for equal rights for all, Men, Women, gay, straight, bisexual, Trans, Black, White, Asian, Hispanic - EVERYONE! Feminism has failed to do this. The book talks about "The Lace Curtain" If you start going off topic you are banned from feminism. Great Story about how this happened to Warren Farrell in the book when he started talking about Men's rights.

​

Links for a new prospective

Warren Farrell's Book

https://www.amazon.com/Women-Cant-Hear-What-Dont/dp/1585420611/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3DPM4YIJX89FM&keywords=women+cant+hear+what+men+dont+say&qid=1551278768&refinements=p_85%3A2470955011&rnid=2470954011&rps=1&s=gateway&sprefix=women+cant+hear%2Caps%2C151&sr=8-1

The centrist party video clip, they also have a great book with a bad title called the Centrist Manifesto

https://youtu.be/enksQuPTFt8

​

​

<sigh>

Even the tagline is biased with lies.

The theory "doofus dad does less around the house" only holds water when you discount male-dominated chores, like cleaning the gutters, mowing lawns, fixing cars, etc.

This have been debunked numerous times by better people than I.

Pls spare us.

Or better yet, read Farrell.

> Married women have almost two more hours of leisure time per week than their husbands. Mothers with children five and older have one hour more of free time per week. To my surprise, mothers with preschool children averaged three hours more per week of free time than dads with preschool children. *

• Quote is from Farrell, referenced from John P. Robinson, "Up Close and Personal," American Demographics, Vol. 11, No. 11, November 1989, pp 10.

>So according to you there is no difference between men playing around with their friends, and corporations exploiting men by depicting them as idiots at our expense to sell products to women.

Oh look, a straw man.

I said, to the observer. And it's true. If you can manipulate the observer's opinion, you create the opinion. This is psych 201 and sales 101.

And let's look for a moment at your distinction without difference, shall we. Assuming the man cares what his audience thinks, then he is in fact exploiting men (himself) by depicting himself as an idiot at his expense to sell humor to other men in return for friendship.


>Anyhow, the woman is making the statement that she can dress how she wants, and its not inviting sexual assault, and reclaiming the word slut, she isn't a company commodifying, commercializing and selling products with her sexuality.

Disingenuous assertions.

Women dress in sexual attire to attract a mate. They know this. They do so at the risk of inviting unwanted sexual attraction. Women know that women call each other sluts, as a sexual strategy/competitive strategy.

Further, anyone with half an understanding of politics, ideology, and economics (and honestly, reality) understands that there is always a commodity, always a product. Entertainment isn't a product - fun is an emotional state. But entertainers sell it. It's disingenuous and intellectually dishonest to suggest that simply because she's not producing a physical thing, nor actually produced the idea, that she's not selling it.



In this case she's selling Feminism.

>There isn't actually anything wrong with us having a grasp of the things we are taking about, beyond that of the casual observer.

If only you had that grasp. If you'd like it, start here

> In "The Frailty Myth," Colette Dowling presents a compelling and well-researched analysis of why and how American girls are socialized to be "weak." Dowling examines the myths about the "weaker sex," tracing this myth as a source of the oppression of women handed down to us from Victorian times.

> She convincingly explains why men fear strong women: In part, she says, it's because strength is perhaps the only area in which our culture does not say that men and women are equal. Thus, as male-only professions and traits are rapidly disappearing from public discourse, strength is masculinity's last hope.

Source: The Frailty Myth: Redefining the Physical Potential of Women and Girls by Colette Dowling.

>The end result of closing the wage gap is women spending more time working in corporations and spending more on consumer goods and the average couple spending more time at work than in the past - just to make ends meet.

This is also Elizabeth Warren's viewpoint, in fact she has a book on the subject, and essentially believes that having both parents in a family working is a huge problem. She thinks it's causing a drop in the quality of life across western civilization, and has been doing so since the 1970s. There's a long and plain spoken lecture on it. It's very statistics heavy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akVL7QY0S8A

As for "Cultural Marxism"; I find it interesting that The Frankfurt School were vehemently against propaganda and indoctrination - having seen the rise of Nazi propaganda in their home country - are targetted and blamed for that exact same thing. They called it "The Culture Industry" and believed it was used against the interests of the masses. To quote Adorno:

>"The Culture Industry not so much adapts to the reactions of its customers as it counterfeits them." -Adorno

>"this bloated pleasure apparatus adds no dignity to man’s lives. The idea of “fully exploiting” available technical resources and the facilities for aesthetic mass consumption is part of the economic system which refuses to exploit resources to abolish hunger." -Adorno, Enlightenment as Mass Deception.

...and yet they're blamed for creating this industry that they were so against! The targetting of this conspiracy theory seems to be on purpose. The creators of this theory have blamed the only group of western intellectuals who had studied the problem in detail. Effectively obscuring what The Frankfurt School were on about.

Luckily now, thanks to the internet - we make our own cultures.

Anyways - I agree with most of what you've written! Congratulations on coming through the thickets and seeing another side!

File a Title IX complaint with the school's title IX office and with the federal government. Instructions here:

http://knowyourix.org/title-ix/how-to-file-a-title-ix-complaint/

Chances are high that the school and OCR will choose not to act on it, but it's important that boys & young men to leave a paper trail documenting discriminatory behavior. Remember, when it comes to the government, if it isn't documented on paper, it basically never happened.

This is a good book for background information on boys in education:

http://www.amazon.com/War-Against-Boys-Misguided-Policies/dp/1501125427/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1449440710&sr=8-1&keywords=war+against+boys

A good advocacy organization is Boys & Men in Education:

http://boysmeneducation.com/

... they may know of good resources / tactics for your son.

Your son could also organize a men's rights student organization on campus. Most campuses are in dire need of that sort of advocacy.

https://www.google.com/search?q=germiane+greere+said+she+awnted+to+light+a+fire+in+older+women+for+teen+boys&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=germaine+greer+book+boys+13+to+16+lust+older+women

https://www.amazon.com/Germaine-Greer-Beautiful-Boy/dp/0847825868

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beautiful_Boy

>Well, I'd like to reclaim for women the right to appreciate the short-lived beauty of boys, real boys, not simpering 30-year-olds with shaved chests."[4] She was criticized for these comments with some writers labeling her a paedophile.[5]


Don't visit the amazon link if you're easily nauseous at seeing teen boys on display in pseudo-erotic manners...

In many cases that is accurate, especially in education. Men are having a crisis where we are falling far behind in schooling in all almost all subjects and in getting degrees. The system is set to favor women and not men. It's such a big problem that is literally affecting the economy. Men are being affected primarily in America, but also around the world.

Yet Australia, New Zealand, and England, among other places, all see it as a problem and are actively promoting ways to help men rise to the status of women (boy only schools that encourage things like rough housing, tag, etc, as an example) while America is doing the opposite. There are major lobbying efforts by women organizations to go against men and stop such policies here. It's literally a war against boys

Maybe the reason for that are the new EU privacy laws? Don't be so quick to make this a conspiracy.

Btw, if you haven't watched the movie, I highly recommend it. You can watch it "for free" with Amazon Prime.

https://www.amazon.com/Red-Pill-Cassie-Jaye/dp/B06XGXD5LL/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1527232530&sr=8-1&keywords=the+red+pill+movie

Stop what you're doing and read this.

No, don't read it later, don't think about things, or add it to your to-do list--stop what you're doing and read it now.

If you'd like more grounding, consider getting the full ebook here (which is free on Kindle Unlimited so you have no real reason not to,) but in a pinch the survival guide above will give you the basics you need to go forward.

Follow the guide. Seriously. Follow it.

• Don't panic.
  
  
• Don't try to reason with them.
  
  
• Don't apologize. Ever.
  
  
• Accept that this is going to negatively impact your life and make peace with it.
  
  
• Document the hell out of everything. Archive.is is your friend, so is Screengrab! though you will always have people claiming photoshop no matter what you do.
  
  
• Don't resign or quit any positions or jobs--make them fire you.
  
  I'd keep posting but by the time I finished I'd have done a bad job of recreating the guide I linked to. So read it. Seriously, just do it. Do it now! The information in that PDF could save your life if not your career.
  
  I sincerely hope you do take this advice seriously. Good luck and Godspeed.

Apologies if this is less clear I am tired and was about to go to bed when you asked.

One of the reasons everyone started switching to have a dual income is to have more money to spend and so they could enjoy a better lifestyle unfortunately due to everyone doing it that is not how things work out instead things are actually more expensive like housing and we actually have less security.

Housing costs go up because people are more able to pay more and those making money off this love it. Plus it allows people to pay to live in a better school district. A increase in test scores one year can add up to 10% value to your house in a single year.
The lack of security in the past if the main bread winner lost his job mother would take a part time job while he looked for a new one. Now if one partner loses their job or if medical problems arise so that one partner cannot work you are in more trouble because you have only one person working when you are stuck in a dual income nation you are pretty much screwed. You have no fallback option when one person is unable to work.

This dual income system sounded great, two people working means twice as much money right? Well not so much instead you are forced to spend it and now you have less security. Even in our parents generation it was a bad idea when it was rare for someone to get laid off when statistically now it will happen at least twice in our generations lifetime for each person than double that because two people working.

If you are interested in learning more I highly suggest reading the book: The two-income trap: Why middle class Americans are going broke by Elizabeth Warren.
http://www.amazon.com/The-Two-Income-Trap-Middle-Class-Parents/dp/0465090907/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1347253401&sr=8-1&keywords=the+dual+income+trap

Social Justice Warriors Always Lie: Taking Down The Thought Police by Vox Day <== A really important work

Propaganda by Edward Bernays

Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion by Robert Cialdini

SJW attack survival guide drawing on the work of Vox Day

How to Disagree Without Being Disagreeable: Getting Your Point Across with the Gentle Art of Verbal Self-Defense

Google "verbal self defense" and a lot will pop up, if you are talking about 1-on-1 and small group contexts.
Google "influence" or "persuasion" or "propaganda" or "social change" if you are talking about large groups or society as a whole.

For one, there's a group that calls themselves The Honey Badgers. They are avid supporters of men's rights. A Voice For Men has several women that are regular contributors on their website. In fact, DV shelter icon Erin Pizzey is one of the co-founders of AVFM.

Dr. Helen Smith wrote a best-selling book about male issues.

I can do this all day....

This is a hilariously common delusion among feminists. The idea that women are on average physically weaker then men because of "patriarchy". And that if only we lived in a perfectly feminist utopic (read: sexless) society, all sexual dimorphic traits would vanish and women would be competing in the exact same powerlifting classes as men. No...seriously, that's what they actually think.

Here's a feminist anthropology PhD on here regurgitating this hilarious nonsense. And an actual book (written by a psychiatrist feminist) basically expressing the view that the only reason men "seem" more physically powerful than women is because teh menz are keeping them weak.

I guess once you decide to take a trip down the deranged rabbit hole of academic feminism, pretty soon no measure absurd research cherry-picking and perversion of reality in the form of wildly deluded "feminist theory" is out of bounds.

The book is called Is Everyone Really Equal? An Introduction to Key Concepts in Social Justice Education by Ozlem Sensoy and Robin DiAngelo, Teachers College Press (2011). The excerpt is taken from page 46.

Damn, its nice seeing someone else who sees the bigger picture here. Have you read or heard about this one? The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Parents are Going Broke. Honestly, I haven't read it myself yet, but I sure mean to soon.

Since this was front-paged I'm gonna hijack the top post and link to the work of Karen Straughan. She posts here occasionally and will hopefully chime in on this thread.

Me a feminist? No way:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqEeCCuFFO8

Is Feminism hate? [skip to the 20 min. mark]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDYAVROaIcs

How Feminism conned society

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RozEFVPDxeg

Benevolent sexism?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VupEC0cAWo

The Tyranny of Female Hypoagency

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBgcjtE0xrE

Feminism and the Disposable Male.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-bA

-----

A few good videos by Lindy Beige on female power in history:

Women power in the past

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrgovSZ32Yg

Sex Power: when women were different and men were disposable

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSX7iT0n65Q

---------

Nice summary of Issues here: Why we need a men's rights movement

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2xmm3p/i_cant_believe_people_think_we_dont_need_a_mens/

------

Good reading:

The Myth of Male Power

http://www.amazon.com/Myth-Male-Power-Warren-Farrell-ebook/dp/B00IDHV5EM

The Privileged Sex

http://www.amazon.com/Privileged-Sex-Martin-van-Creveld-ebook/dp/B00EX5PJC2/ref=sr_1_sc_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1427403378&sr=1-1-spell&keywords=privilged+sex

No More Sex War

http://www.amazon.com/More-Sex-War-Neil-Lyndon/dp/1856191915/ref=sr_1_cc_1?s=aps&ie=UTF8&qid=1427403395&sr=1-1-catcorr&keywords=no+more+sex+war

The Second Sexism

http://www.amazon.com/Second-Sexism-Discrimination-Against-Boys/dp/0470674512/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1427403501&sr=1-1&keywords=second+sexism

The War Against Boys

http://www.amazon.com/War-Against-Boys-Misguided-Policies/dp/1451644183/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1427403440&sr=1-1&keywords=war+against+boys

Hi Alanna, thank you for commenting.

>That book is bullshit.

That could be, (it certainly was one of the most depressing books I have ever read) but I have met enough women like the one this thread is about (or these women) to know they are a sizable population.

>I love my father and my husband.

That is good. It is heartening.

I agree with you that the psychology/self-help section is mostly BS.

As far as spreading hatred toward men, I blame the the feminist movement, which for the past four decades have been systematically Spreading Misandry, Legalizing Misandry, waging an all out War Against Men and sadly even a War Against Boys.

In case this is the first time you've heard about her, Helen Smith is one of the few unicorns out there. She genuinely cares for men and has written a famous book on the topic of MGTOW and several articles about the treatment that men receive in this society.

I think /u/goodmod should be banished from this board for deciding to "sticky" shit posts like this one.

Want to test a feminist's beliefs? Have her watch The Red Pill for free with Amazon Prime.

If, at the end of watching it she cannot see how Cassie had a change of heart then she will never, ever, "get" this board.

> Whether or not feminism actually is pushing "equality for women" is its own issue

No, it is the FUNDAMENTAL issue.

> if a well-intentioned feminist didn't believe that feminism meant "equality for women", then they would be contradicting themself.

So, and I am literally taking OP's words at face value, if a feminist doesn't believe that women should be required to sign up for the Selective Service (in the US) then she is contradicting herself.

/u/DignafiedAlpaca is showing herself to be a false flag operative nudging us towards "why can't we all just get along" (and be a little more like women)? Fuck that.

Germaine Greer should know better, since she's an ephebophile herself.

Sure, here is a quick paper on the methods feminism uses to cover up and minimise female perpetrated domestic violence to conform to its theories on how it should look.

http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/V74-gender-symmetry-with-gramham-Kevan-Method%208-.pdf


Here is Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge'

>Professing Feminism: Education and Indoctrination in Women's Studies

http://www.amazon.com/Professing-Feminism-Education-Indoctrination-Studies/dp/0739104551


Not peer reviewed like the first two, but an article from Real Clear Science on the topic

>Column: When 'science' looks for sexism, it finds it

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/2011-07-26-men-women-feminism-sexism_n.htm

https://www.amazon.com/How-Destroy-Man-Now-DAMN/dp/099982032X

Here is the book: http://www.amazon.com/Everyone-Introduction-Concepts-Education-Multicultural/dp/080775269X

2011.

http://www.amazon.com/Everyone-Introduction-Concepts-Education-Multicultural/dp/080775269X

The misandry series.

• Spreading Misandry
  
• Legalizing Misandry
  
• Sanctifying Misandry
  
  edit: added links

Sally Miller Gearhart, "The Future—If There Is One—Is Female," Reweaving the Web of Life: Feminism and Nonviolence, New Society Publishers 1982:266–284.

Edit: https://www.amazon.com/Reweaving-Web-Life-Feminism-Nonviolence/dp/0865710163

Linky...

Thirty years ago, John Gordon's seminal MR book, Myth of the Monstrous Male, pointed out how middle/upper-class white women have usurped programmes (positive discrimination, affirmative action) rightly meant for blacks.





https://www.amazon.com/myth-monstrous-other-feminist-fables/dp/0872237583

You would think so, but it doesn't seem to be: https://www.amazon.com/How-Destroy-Man-Now-DAMN/dp/099982032X

>we might support them in their well-being, while recognizing that men certainly hold privilege and power in sociopolitical fields and economically.

Not entirely true. There are more men at the top of the food chain than women. But there are also more men at the bottom of the food chain. Women tend to cluster towards the middle for whatever reason. https://www.amazon.com/Men-Strike-Boycotting-Marriage-Fatherhood-ebook/dp/B00OFK22Y8/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3DN7GTVDU7C4I&keywords=men+on+strike&qid=1556005635&s=books&sprefix=Men+On+Strike%2Caps%2C148&sr=1-1

​

>When we talk about traditional masculine ideology, those are the things in culture—and right now we're in a particular historical time and culture—that are prescriptive (what boys and men should do) and proscriptive (what boys and men should not do). There's a lot of diversity in the way masculinity is experienced and expressed. Some of these standards have held popular ideas in a certain segment of the population: Things like the avoidance of being seen as weak, extreme risk-taking, or extreme levels of aggression or violence.

The problem with this way of thinking is that it is idealist. It says that the problems are certain ideas floating around in our minds that are causing the problem. The ideas that occupy people's heads are logically dependent on their physical and social circumstances, not the other way around. https://www.cambridgescholars.com/download/sample/61013

​

I have said it once before but it bears repeating now.

Were you seriously suggesting that this is fake? Amazon

Yep. Must read Terminated, company is saying I cannot sue and, perhaps, Should read How to Destroy A Man Now (DAMN): A Handbook

Agreed — and here's the evidence:

Like male circumcision, there are plenty of peer reviewed scientific studies, cultural research reports, and personal testimonials, that show female circumcision is not a barrier to sexual orgasm and enjoyment.

You'll often come across members of the medical community saying that FGM has no "health" benefits, and if women have their clitoris amputated, then their sex life comes to an end. Then they say that MGM has lots of "health" benefits and that men's sex life is not affected.

But it's a myth that many women who have suffered FGM are unhappy and cannot have great sex lives. That's why they queue up to have their daughters' circumcised.

Female Circumcision & Sexual Response

The truth about the female clitoris

The visible part - the glans clitoris - is only a small part of the whole clitoris. So when a woman suffers partial or total amputation of the external clitoris when undergoing FGM, only a small part of her clitoris is removed. Thus she often can enjoy a full and satisfying sex life.

Learn how large the female clitoris is; and how the external glans clitoris is just a small part of it:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/28/cliteracy_n_3823983.html
http://womenshealth.about.com/cs/sexuality/a/clitoraltruthin.htm

http://www.amazon.com/The-Clitoral-Truth-Secret-Fingertips/dp/1583224734

”Why Some Women Choose to Get Circumcised” — The Atlantic Magazine

“An anthropologist discusses some common misconceptions about female genital cutting, including the idea that men force women to undergo the procedure”:

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/04/female-genital-mutilation-cutting-anthropologist/389640/

”Fuambai Ahmadu explains how female circumcision is empowering and culturally enriching, and why she chose to get circumcised” — BBC Interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mV6UfEaZHBE

”Fuambai says circumcision is an essential part of her culture and she doesn't feel mutilated” — Insight Interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adbxVctxoMU

"3,000 Afrian Maasai women protest in favour of FGM and against the government banning it" — Note how the men are ordered to keep quiet!:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_Q9hRH6fCo

”Circumcised Women Fight Back”:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pk-KC75YUBY

"FGM: Maasai women speak out" — The activists leading this (anti-FGM) movement have failed to understand the cultures behind the practice, and their ignorance is dangerous. Legislation, particularly the criminalization of FGM, and other external pressures that do not take local culture into account can have deadly consequences:

https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/fgm-maasai-women-speak-out

”Seven things to know about female genital surgeries in Africa” — By the public policy advisory network on female genital surgeries in Africa. Western media coverage of female genital modifications in Africa has been hyperbolic and one-sided, presenting them uniformly as mutilation and ignoring the cultural complexities that underlie these practices:

https://www.sfog.se/media/295486/omskarelse_rapport.pdf

"International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:

Female genital cutting in this group of women did not attenuate sexual feelings:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01550.x/abstract

"The Journal of Sexual Medicine" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:

Pleasure and orgasm in women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C):

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17970975

"The New Scientist" (references a medical journal)

Female Circumcision Does Not Reduce Sexual Activity:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2837-female-circumcision-does-not-reduce-sexual-activity.html#.Uml2H2RDtOQ

"Journal of General Internal Medicine" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:

Female "Circumcision" — African Women Confront American Medicine:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1497147/

Medical benefits of female circumcision: Dr. Haamid al-Ghawaabi [Unscientific opinion — no different to the sort of stuff spouted by western Doctors about the wonderful "benefits" of male circumcision]:

http://islamqa.info/en/ref/45528

"Pediatrics (AAP)" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown:

Genital Cutting Advocated By American Academy Of Pediatrics:

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/102/1/153.short

I'd first like to give you a couple pointers of people/publications you might want to connect with to give you a deeper understanding:

Tom Golden (menaregood) is a psychotherapist (once a member of APA section that published the infamous guidelines) who has published a couple rather good books like the way men heal. He might be interesting to talk to with respect solution oriented, resource centered approaches to men's issues.

Helen Smith (interview) is a psychotherapist who has published Men on strike which is focused on men opting out of marriage and fatherhood and many of the underlying issues she uncovers in direct conversations with men also are at play in your area of concern, I think.

​

Secondly, my personal opinion:

I share most of the concerns that have already been expressed by others with respect to the misandry and racism of the grievance studies fields.

One risk that I'd personally be worried about is doxxing.

The grievance studies activists are known to play dirty. So, if I have to provide identifying information, there's a substancial risk that it will be mishandled (very likely with university "researchers" in my experience) and could end up in the hands of activists who then starts to harass me by pressuring my employer or other organizations I'm affiliated with or one of the other typical character assassination tactics those people are notorious for using.

So, the risk of having substancial negative impact on my personal life stands against marginal benefit of participating in a study that at best will have little to no impact and at worst is just yet another disguised hit job aiming to demonize men.

This is the (in the words of Helen Smith) the rational cost benefit analysis, I'm running when it comes to engaging with grievance studies.

​

I'm a former member of the academy and have witnessed the abyssimal conduct of grievance studies activists first hand, so please spare me the "not all social science researchers" blabla.

>Not going to link it since I don't want to be accused of advertising or marketing

I got you. Accuse away.

Here

You should actually read up about this stuff, before you go insulting everyone here by calling them delusional because you feel that they are wrong and you know better.

http://www.amazon.com/Professing-Feminism-Education-Indoctrination-Studies/dp/0739104551/ref=pd_sim_b_6

http://www.amazon.com/Legalizing-Misandry-Systemic-Discrimination-Against/dp/0773528628/ref=pd_bxgy_b_img_b

http://www.amazon.com/Who-Stole-Feminism-Women-Betrayed/dp/0684801566

I don't really know how to edit it at all but I'd include a bunch more references such as:

http://archiveswest.orbiscascade.org/ark:/80444/xv81757/pdf

http://archiveswest.orbiscascade.org/ark:/80444/xv81757

https://library.uoregon.edu/special-collections

her essay where she talks about wanting all the men to die is included in her book

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0865710163/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=0865710163&linkCode=as2&tag=theamericanre-20&linkId=NB64LM5XL2PUF6GU which was already referenced previously.

I have done extensive research, which is why I hate feminists. I am an antifeminist - someone who is against the feminist movement, which for the past four decades have been systematically Spreading Misandry, Legalizing Misandry, waging an all out War Against Men and sadly even a War Against Boys.

A Reference book of men's issues is probably your best bet for finding relevant studies.

[MRRef] (https://www.reddit.com/r/MRRef/) is more extensive but will require more digging.

Videos:

The Red Pill (NYA)

Everything by Karen Straughan

Everything by Janice Fiamengo

Books:

[Is There Anything Good About Men?] (https://gendertruce.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/baumeister-roy-is-there-anything-good-about-men.pdf) (full book online) by Roy Baumeister

The Myth of Male Power: Why Men are the Disposable Sex by Warren Farrell

The Privileged Sex by Martin Van Creveld

The Second Sexism: Discrimination Against Men and Boys by David Benetar

The Fraud of Feminism (full book online) by Earnest Belford Bax

Who Stole Feminism? by Christina Hoff Sommers

The War Against Boys by Christina Hoff Sommers

Spreading Misandry: The Teaching of Contempt for Men in Popular Culture by Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young

Legalizing Misandry: From Public Shame to Systemic Discrimination Against Men by Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young

Sanctifying Misandry: Goddess Ideology and the Fall of Man by Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young

Replacing Misandry: A Revolutionary History of Men by Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young

No More Sex War by Neil Lyndon

A few works that I think deserve more attention. Some are directly related to Men's Rights, others tangentially.

Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior by Christopher Boehm

War, Peace, Human Nature: Converging Evolutionary & Cultural Views by Douglas Fry et. al

Female Forms of Power and the Myth of Male Dominance: A Model of Female/Male Interaction in Peasant Society (paper online) by Susan Carol Rogers

Favoured or oppressed? Married women, property and ‘coverture’ in England, 1660–1800 (paper online) by J. Bailey

The Mothers: A Study of the Origins of Sentiments and Institutions (full book online) by Robert Briffault

Gynocentrism: From Feudalism to the Modern Disney Princess by Peter Wright

Sex and Culture (full book online) by J.D. Unwin

The Manipulated Man (full book online) by Esther Villar

Unknown Misandry (website)

Real Sexism (website)

The term "Gender Studies" is so broad that it is really hard to create a one size fits all rebuttal instead you have to attack individual claims. The subject itself has been criticised heavily from its inception (it was ridiculed by Sociologists during the Second Wave but sadly it infected the subject).

This is a great book criticising the subject itself

SJWs Always Lie.

>The eight stages of the SJW attack:
>
>1. Locate or Create a Violation of the Narrative.
>2. Point and Shriek.
>3. Isolate and Swarm.
>4. Reject and Transform.
>5. Press for Surrender.
>6. Appeal to Amenable Authority.
>7. Show Trial.
>8. Victory Parade.
>
>SJWs don't like to be seen as the vicious attack dogs they are because that flies in the face of their determination to present themselves as victims holding the moral high ground.

Vox Day, SJWs Always Lie: Taking Down the Thought Police, Castalia House, Aug 2015, ASIN: B014GMBUR4 - Kindle Loc. 570

Few things:

• Garst inserts a comment about "mother goddesses" at one point. I suspect she subscribes to the theory that we used to live in peaceful quasi-matriarchal societies that were conquered by brutal patriarchs. This feminist myth was popularized by figures like Riane Eisler ("The Chalice and the Blade") and is dissected by pro-MRA Canadian academics Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young in their book Sanctifying Misandry: Goddess Ideology and the Fall of Men. It is no longer taken seriously by any credible academics; here's a good debunking.
  
  
• Garst claims that NOW is only opposed to "forced" shared parenting. This is a trick of language. NOW opposes default shared parenting, ie the idea that a woman should be "forced" to share parenting with her ex instead of getting primary custody (and the corollary: the man is forced to lose access to his children). They do not merely oppose shared parenting in cases where eg the husband is legitimately abusive. Thankfully someone in the audience mentioned NOW's opposition to a shared parenting bill in Florida during the Q and A.
  
  
• Garst mentions that a woman dressed up like a man, fought in the revolutionary war and later received a pension for her service. She therefore portrays war as an exercise in glory rather than brutal sacrifice and forced servitude. In reality the vast majority of wars have been fought by men who had to be coerced into the role of soldier. Eg men in Europe who abandoned their posts during WWI were shot.
  
  
• Garst's opinions on marriage are disturbing. She says people shouldn't get married until their 30's. Putting aside the fact that men probably shouldn't get married at all until the laws change, this is horrible advice. Honey Badger Brian Martinez was in the audience and mentioned in the Q and A the minor fact that after age 26 women suffer an increased risk (which grows exponentially with age) of pregnancy complications. They also suffer an increased risk of getting cancer if they don't have any children at all. NOW actually opposed an awareness campaign that sought to teach women about age and fertility; this is a remarkable example of feminists placing ideology above even female health. I found the general tone of the discussion about abortion by both parties troubling; while I support the right of women to get an abortion, I think it's a tragedy when it happens.
  
  Armchair quarterback time. Straughan did a brilliant job as always but perhaps a little constructive criticism couldn't hurt:
  
  
• She rightly points out that if women were subject to conscription they would not be placed in front line combat but fulfill supplementary roles. This was a missed opportunity to talk about male disposability and the sacrifices men make in exchange for their rights.
  
  
• the feminist's primary concern seemed to be abortion rights. Yet Straughan never mentioned the fact that men don't have the right of legal parental surrender. Whereas women can have an abortion or drop the baby off at a safe haven (sometimes they can even kill their newborns and receive no punishment, as happened last week in Canada), men are on the hook for 18 years whether they wanted the baby or not. IMO just quoting dissident second wave feminist Karen DeCrow on the subject would blow the minds of quite a few third wave feminists.
  
  
• Straughan began by stressing the importance of equal responsibilities for women and equal compassion for men, yet didn't really follow through with examples of female institutional privilege beyond the custody issue. In debates of this nature it would be highly useful to stress: institutional discrimination against boys in school; the massive difference in the way men and women are treated by the criminal justice system; the health care spending gap; the suicide gap; the workplace death gap and so forth. These stats could be listed in about 20 seconds and would make a powerful impact.
  
  Overall though a pretty good discussion, and though the feminist is obviously wrong about a number of issues she did show a willingness to acknowledge female privilege and change her views.
  
  Thanks "bad" Karen or /u/girlwriteswhat ;)

I just remembered: far and away the main resource you can use is this chapter about "the lace curtain" from Warren Farrell's highly-recommended book, Women Can't Hear What Men Don't Say. It is all about how men and their issues are overlooked in society and media.

If you're allowed to use non-Australian sources, might I suggest you emphasise the point that boys don't get gendered support from schooling age. My own theory is that the reason it's mainly men who succeed in business, economics, and leadership partly because we are left to our own devices at a young age, and while girls are receiving help from a skewed education system with specialist programs catered specifically to their gender, boys reluctantly learn that they have to fend for themselves and take big risks for themselves in order to survive in this unforgiving world. I reckon it's the same reason why infant boys and girls cry at the same rate but boys cry much less at around aged 7 or 8.

(Girls' and women's programs are extremely appealing to them, by the way, because of the heavily lopsided in-group bias that women have toward each other, as opposed to the out-group bias that men have against each other. Male-only programs won't have anywhere near the appeal as female-only ones because guys just don't think like that.)

Some links about boys and schooling:

• http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/05/the-war-against-boys/304659/
  
  
• http://ideas.time.com/2013/10/28/what-schools-can-do-to-help-boys-succeed/
  
  
• http://www.thebookseller.com/news/parents-spend-25-less-books-boys-study-reveals-398381
  
  
• http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11668169/Why-arent-we-doing-more-to-encourage-men-to-be-primary-school-teachers.html
  
  
• http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2013/09/how-to-make-school-better-for-boys/279635/
  
  
• https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/eliminating-feminist-teacher-bias-erases-boys-falling-grades-study-finds
  
  
• http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/03/10/defending_boys_in_a_girl_power_age__129930.html
  
  
• https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/its-no-surprise-if-men-decide-university-isnt-them
  
  
• http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/aug/14/edinburghfestival2001.edinburghbookfestival2001
  
  
• https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/real-men-dont-write-blogs/201511/mans-world-not-boys
  
  
• http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11747413/We-must-stop-indoctrinating-boys-in-feminist-ideology.html
  
  
• http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/sam-dorman/study-boys-affected-more-girls-family-disadvantages
  
  
• https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/boys-men/201308/young-men-who-commit-suicide
  
  
• https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/01/28/the-serious-reason-boys-do-worse-than-girls/
  
  
• http://relatingtomen.com/gender-politics/never-hit-a-girl/
  
  
• https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4qfmfc/teach_him_early_sexist_feminist_ad_campaign/d4sxlyv/
  
  And, finally, one of my own thread of three posts here on Reddit that include many of the aforementioned links:
  
  
• https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4uv6bn/why_treating_boys_like_girls_wont_close_the/d5ua0k1/?context=3
  
  
  I do apologise for bombarding you with resources, but I spent a long time being a feminist and empathising with their viewpoints, not realising that were deceptively painting only part of a much bigger picture. When I realised just how much I had been shamed and lied to, I had a lot of unlearning to do, hence all the internet bookmarks and books I now have. Of course women have issues worth fighting for, but none of them are anywhere near as dire as how they are portrayed: 1 in 51 (American) college women sexually assaulted on campus rather than the advertised 1 in 4, a near negligible earnings gap between genders rather than a 23% pay difference for "the same job", etc.

Men's Rights FAQ Additions:

0D: Modern feminism: an evaluation

0E: How feminists tried to destroy the family

0F: Feminist Quotes

0G: The Ten Most Common Feminist Myths

0H: Women need to speak out on feminism and the hateful ideology it represents

0I: The Definition of Anti-Feminism

0J: The feminist trojan horse in Family Law, Australia, George Christensen

0K: The Origins of Political Correctness/Feminism

0L: Myths and Facts Concerning Divorced Families and other Feminist Myths

0M: Professing Feminism: Education and Indoctrination in Women's Studies

0N: Feminism labeled a ’society killer’

0O: To the women of NOW – a rant by Steven DeLuca

1F: 12 indisputable indicators that Men are Second Class citizens in the USA

1G: Discrimination Against Men in India

1H: Drawing up a list: Codified legal rights that women have, which men lack.

1I: Feminist Lies Exposed: Facts about equal pay, domestic violence, feminist hoaxes, anti-male bigotry, gender politics, and media bias.

1J: Men will suffer from new laws on sex discrimination, academic warns (UK)

1K: Feminist myths 'are making equality laws unfair to men'

1L: UN Cheats Men With Gender Agenda

1M: VAWA Must Be Rewritten by by Phyllis Schlafly

1N: Feminists tell you that the solution to men's issues is more feminism. In reality, feminists fight against men's issues.

1O: Suzanne Venker- Feminism Doesn’t Liberate Women - Radio Boston

1P: The Flipside of Feminism (book) - Suzanne Venker and Phyllis Schlafly

1Q: New study blasts theory that women do more work - Catherine Hakim

1L: Five feminist 'myths' from the gender equality debate -Catherine Hakim

1M: Feminist myths and magic medicine: the flawed thinking behind calls for further equality legislation. - Catherine Hakim

1N: NYT and Time Discover Men and Women Work Equally

2B: Mommy's little secret, Paternity Fraud: roughly 10 percent of babies are not fathered by the man we believe to be dad.

2C: Fatherless Homes Breed Violence - 85% of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes (Source: Center for Disease Control)

3B: Why we should protect those accused of rape

4B: Female paedophile stats

4C: UK's Childline receives More Reports of Female Sexual Abusers of Children

4D: Top Ten Myths about Female Sex Offenders

4E: The Rape of Men: male rape is endemic in many of the world's conflicts

4F: Rape Common War Crime Against Men - Discussed on TheYoungTurks

4G: The silent male victims of rape - Al Jazeera English

5C: RADAR Media Fact Sheet: Women are just as likely as men to engage in partner aggression.

5D: Venus: The Dark Side--Female Sociopaths (Part I)

14B: 10 Reasons You Should Rethink Infant Circumcision

14C: The effect of male circumcision on sexuality - DaiSik Kim, Myung-Geol Pang

14D: How Male Circumcision Harms Women - Ronald Goldman, Ph.D.

22: Misandry Ignored

22B: What is Misandry

22C: Carey Roberts on Misandry

22D: Misandric Songs

23: Does Obamacare discriminate against men?

23B: A Gender Gap in Cancer, Prostate, Breast

23C: Pesticides on fruit and vegetables ' are wrecking men's fertility'

23D: A push for a federal focus on men's health

23E: Male Depression: How to Deal with It

23F: Women's brains ARE different from men's, and here's scientific proof

23G: Feminism begs to differ, but unisex brain is a fantasy

23H: Sex Difference On Spatial Skill Test Linked To Brain Structure

24: Equality is Not the same as Symmetry

25: Manginas - Betrayers Of Men

25B: An unhealthy respect for women... Marriage and Eligibity

25C: Forbes: Don't Marry Career Women

26: A List of Major Inventions Created by Men

26B: Men on average, versus women on average

26C: Men Invented Humanity

27: Feminist Code Speak

27B: The Catalogue of Anti-Male Shaming Tactics

27C: Aaron Russo: Feminism was created to destabilize society

27D: The Female Privilege Checklist

27E: Sexual Slavery Of Men

27F: Marc Rudov Busts Undercover Feminist

27G: Unearthing Matriarchy - The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory: Why An Invented Past Will Not Give Women a Future (Beacon Press 2001)

27H: It's Only Sexist When Men Do It -TheAmazingAtheist explains the sexist double standard.

27I: Men's Health Australia Busts Office for Women's 'False and Misleading' DV Statistics

27J: Exclusive:The Feminization of American Education

27K: Hoax: The Continuing Distortions about Intimate Partner Abuse | Christina Hoff Sommers | Return of the Super Bowl Hoax.

27L: Mounting Evidence Supports Reliability and Validity of Parental Alienation