Top products from r/SocialJusticeInAction

Followup: "It’s time to consider a curfew for men".

> There are solutions: a feminist revolution; real consequences for men who rape, harass, and abuse women; ensuring women are financially independent and that they are able to leave abusers safely; a cultural shift that addresses male entitlement, porn culture, and the objectifying male gaze; an end to masculinity

> You’ve had your chance, bepenised ones. And you’ve blown it.

Ctrl-F "migr" (migrant, immigration): nothing. Ctrl-F "background", "origin", "africa", "arab", "muslim", "islam", any hint that it's any subset of the bepenised ones identifiable in any way - nope.

This is what happens when reporters gloss over the importation of an actual rape culture. I'm not even particularly angry at the idiotic feminist Meghan Murphy here; she's seeing what she wants to see from newspapers that print what she wants to see, each one distorting the truth a little more along the way. I'm mostly angry at the reporters, and at this point I'm wondering if some kind of truth-in-advertising law might be a good way to make them straighten up and fly right without infringing on freedom of speech. Something along the lines of requiring newspapers or individual articles to be marked with one of a few kinds of legal notices:

1. "This article is for entertainment purposes only and should not be cited as a serious source"
   
   
2. "This article is for locally focused subculture reporting only and should not be taken as representative of any general trend"
   
   
3. "This article represents a serious, honest attempt at balanced reporting for which I am willing to be criminally liable."
   
   Then prosecute anyone who marks this sort of shit as type 3. This is closely related to the concept of skin in the game and the expression "put your money where your mouth is", but I think there's something more to it: in part, having to answer for your actions is one of the fundamental attributes of adulthood. Becoming mature involves being held accountable. Adults can make formal promises about what they'll do a year from now and we expect them to do it. Whereas four-year-olds enjoy the privilege of changing their minds on a whim, not being expected to stick to any promises other than perhaps showing up at a friend's birthday, nor are we surprised if they lie their asses off about how they totally didn't break into the cupboard and eat all the cookies in the cookie jar, the gorilla did it. And correspondingly, four-year-olds can hardly be the recipients of obligations either. We can promise them the moon and not expect to deliver. They're not full people. Well, it seems quite a lot of reporters and newspapers are collectively behaving like sub-people too.

>No, I don't want to say it is irrational for other people to believe in this. It seems to me it would be perfectly rational for them to believe in this, but I can't cope with this idea at all. It seems to me so unlike anything else that happens in the universe.

This is Dr. Antony Flew, an at the time atheist, admitting in a public debate with Dr. Gary Habermas, a prominent Christian apologist, that the only reason he didn't believe in the resurrection of Jesus Christ is because he a priori decided it was impossible. At the same time, he admits that the resurrection of Jesus Christ is a reasonable conclusion to draw from the evidence that we have.

The transcript of this debate, along with a couple of other essays, can be found in Did the Resurrection Happen?

> Tell me this is real. Please.

Seems like, though priced very capitalistically:

https://www.amazon.ca/Hasbro-Monopoly-Socialism-Board-Parody/dp/B07VPRNZJB

I have to disagree. A condition which affects few people is still important. Particularly important, in the case of "intersex" people (people who are born with some of the characteristics of either sex) is whether they should be surgically reassigned when babies. A good discussion of this can be found in Galileo's Middle Finger by Alice Dreger, which is also a discussion of the dangers of Social Justice from someone on the inside.

Why is she a "hero"? Women have been making yogurt with vaginal bacteria for ages.

And there's a cum cookbook on Amazon that's getting good reviews.

WRONG people choose to be gay because they are sexual deviants/nymphos who want to fuck everything. Homosexuals have far more sex than straight people and that is why they spread diseases so much more.

Gay men are 60x more likely to have HIV than straight men. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3462414/


Gay men, who are 1.65% of the US population, account for 63% of the country’s syphilis cases. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print



In 2010, homosexuals were about 200 times more likely than everyone else to be diagnosed with HIV. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print


Gay men are 15 times more likely to have Hepatitis B than everyone else. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print


Infection rates for gonorrhea and chlamydia are increasing among active homosexual men. Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/the_gay_agenda_and_the_real_world.html


Gay men, 1% of the population, account for 83% of syphilis cases. Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/the_gay_agenda_and_the_real_world.html


Syphilis was almost eradicated but made a comeback among homosexual men. Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/the_gay_agenda_and_the_real_world.html


Active homosexual men are 17 times more likely than straight people to have anal cancer. Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/the_gay_agenda_and_the_real_world.html


10 to 15 percent of older homosexuals have more than 1000 sex partners. Source: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3813477


79% of homosexual men say over half of their sex partners are strangers. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Unequal-Opportunity-Disparities-Affecting-Bisexual/dp/0195301536


Married homosexual men are 50% more likely than straight couples to divorce. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print


Over 20% of older homosexuals have had more than 500 different sex partners. Source: http://advindicate.com/articles/3022


The average gay man has several dozen sex partners per year. Source: http://advindicate.com/articles/3022


28% of homosexuals have had sex with over a thousand men. For straight men? Just 25% have had sex with more than 10 women. Source: http://advindicate.com/articles/3022

The book is better

Article. The book is Superior: The Return of Race Science by Angela Saini.

Here is the mobile version of your link

Willing Accomplices: How KGB Covert Influence Agents Created Political Correctness and Destroyed America.

Its the most racist time of the year.

>and title 9 needs to be addressed to keep this shit from happening so often

This problem goes well beyond higher education. Look how many men are having their careers destroyed simply because a woman wants to have her 15 minutes of fame? Or to remove him from the path of her ambitions? Or get back at him because “he looked at me in a way that upset me”?

The root of the problem is that, for women, the false accusation is a consequence-free tool of male socioeconomic destruction. There is quite literally little to no blowback to any woman for filing a false accusation, and done under the right circumstances (a male colleague occupying a position she wants to be promoted to, etc.) she can have everything to gain. It is only been in the last few months where a miniscule minority of the most egregious false accusation offenders have been handed incarceration sentences that are almost laughably short by male standards.

There is a very real reason why the Pence Rule has acquired a sudden and very significant surge in popularity…

Yep. And also don't forget that logic is, like totally male:
Andrea Nye, Words of Power: A Feminist Reading Of The History Of Logic

Here's a quote:
"Desperate, lonely, cut off from the human community which in many cases has ceased to exist, under the sentence of violent death, wracked by desires for intimacy that they do not know how to fulfill, at the same time tormented by the presence of women, men turn to logic."

It also, IIRC, contains the following argument (this argument is somewhere in the bullshit "feminist logic" literature, but maybe not in WoP):
Arguments come in chains, chains are for oppression, therefore logic is for oppression.

It definitely includes the argument that logic is not to be trusted because bad arguments are called 'invalid'...and 'invalid' (with the different pronunciation) is a bad word meaning "disabled person."