(Part 2) Top products from r/TheBluePill
We found 25 product mentions on r/TheBluePill. We ranked the 97 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the products ranked 21-40. You can also go back to the previous section.
21. The Principia: Or, the First Principles of Natural Things, Being New Attempts Toward a Philosophical Explanation of the Elementary World
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
22. Female Rage: Unlocking Its Secrets, Claiming Its Power
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
24. Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus: The Classic Guide to Understanding the Opposite Sex
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
Men are from Mars Women are from Venus The Classic Guide to Understanding the Opposite Sex
25. Sex at Dawn: The Prehistoric Origins of Modern Sexuality
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
HarperTorch
26. Sex at Dawn: How We Mate, Why We Stray, and What It Means for Modern Relationships
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
Sex at Dawn How We Mate Why We Stray and What It Means for Modern Relationships
27. What Do Women Want?: Adventures in the Science of Female Desire
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
28. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
The Blank Slate The Modern Denial of Human Nature
29. Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
Penguin Books
30. Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature (A Bradford Book)
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
31. Reflections on Gender and Science: Tenth Anniversary Paperback Edition
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
32. The Future Is Male - Men Women Funny T Shirt Gift
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
Have fun triggering feminists with this "The Future Is Male" T-Shirt! Perfect for MRA, MGTOW, MeninistThis funny "The Future Is Male" TShirt makes a perfect Christmas or birthday gift!Lightweight, Classic fit, Double-needle sleeve and bottom hem
33. Fascinating Womanhood: How the ideal women awakens a Man's Deepest Love and tenderness
Sentiment score: 1
Number of reviews: 1
34. Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
The #1 international best seller
36. Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
37. The Cosmopolitan Canopy: Race and Civility in Everyday Life
Sentiment score: 0
Number of reviews: 1
38. Why Does He Do That?: Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men
Sentiment score: -1
Number of reviews: 1
Abusive husbandControling menAbusive relationshipdrugs and alcoholcounseling
I know that I am 7 days late, but I just read your comment and I just… Can’t.
What? You're a girl? Your argument is completely moot, then! This absolutely holds zero weight now that I know you're a girl.
The fact that you just dismissed everything I said because of my gender, really demonstrates your lack of objectivity and logic. In case you haven’t figured this out, gender is not a black or white thing. You can be Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Pansexual, Transgender, Transsexual, Queer, Questioning, Intersex, Intergender, Asexual , etc. Not to mention the fact that you can be a straight, cisgender person who does not conform to most of, if any of the stereotypes attributed to your gender.
You have no idea what it's like to be a guy
You just put almost 4 billion people into one category. Good job on sounding like a dumbass. You have no idea what I’m like, and the fact that you think every male is like you shows that you have zero objective reasoning skills. Travel the world a bit and you’ll realize how much “being a guy” differs from culture to culture, not to mention from person to person.
I’m not even red pill
Your labels mean nothing to me, and furthermore, you've already proven that you’re ignorant as fuck. You’re also sexist since you dismissed everything I said because I have a vagina.
You aren't a guy. You don't have the male libido. Unfortunately, you can never understand this because you don't think about sex every 2 seconds. Yes. We are prisoners to our libido. For most guys, it's fucking torture to not have sex for a month or longer.
The “male libido” is not a thing lol. Men’s libidos fall into a wide range, and contrary to what the media told you, not every male has a high libido. If this were true, there wouldn’t be millions of women complaining that their sex drives are higher than their partners. All of my best friends have been male since I was about 3 years old. 5 of them have told me that they do not have a high sex drive, that they can go a long time without having sex. Of course, this is not something that they publicize to everyone which further perpetuates the stereotypes. Two of my exes had lower sex drives than I did. I’m sorry that you live in a bubble and haven’t had enough experience to realize the wide variety of sex drives out there.
"Spinning plates" is way fucking better than not spinning plates, by a large margin.
How do you know this? You have just proven what I said in my previous post, that those who have not experienced something and crave it, have many grand illusions about the fulfillment that the object of their desire will bring to them. I have dated some super hot guys who had been having tons of sex since the day they hit puberty; they have all confirmed that it does not fulfill them at all. I have many friends who are male models, they have told me the same thing. You will however dismiss this and choose to believe a bunch of guys like yourself whose years of desperation have warped their whole perception of true self-esteem and fulfillment.
That is not an exaggeration, we think about sex every 2 seconds. It is on our minds all the time.
Wow, do you ever stop projecting your own experiences onto everyone else? Also, how do you know that I do not think of sex all the time? You don’t know a fucking thing, you’re just a silly hamster trying to rationalize your own obsessions and desperation. Guys who have a very easy time getting sex do not think of sex every two seconds, I know this from experience. In fact, it turned out that I thought of sex more than my ex did, and his sex drive was very high. It makes sense though that you think of sex every minute, because the lack of it has caused you to become obsessed with it. I feel your pain though, because when I went long time without having sex, I thought about it all the time too. Meditation might help you.
See, this doesn't hold any weight in the argument since you're a girl.
Again with the sexism; do you ever stop trying to put everything and everyone into little boxes? There are much healthier ways to deal with the uncertainty of life than to dull your existence to that level. I am the kind of person who others open up to, and I often have very deep conversations with people. This is something that most of my very hot “alpha” male friends and exes have told me, not to mention basic psychology.
You don't understand that guys do not receive the same amount of attention from girls as vice versa.
You clearly don’t know many guys, because two of my best friends (male) get checked out constantly. I can’t spend a night out with them without little girls obsessing over them and walking by our table 10 times. Just because you haven’t gotten much female attention, does not mean that other guys don’t.
Plus, if you're as attractive as you say you are, you probably have at least 4 male friends in your phone contacts right now, that if you asked them for sex, they'd come over and fuck you within the hour.
This is another myth. If this were true, I wouldn’t have had periods where I didn’t have sex for months at a time. Also, my very good looking female friends wouldn’t complain to me constantly about how horny they are and how there’s no one to have sex with. Contrary to what you think, most attractive guys are not animals who will fuck someone after knowing them for a few hours, or run out to fuck someone just because they got a text. It takes time for them to get comfortable too. My best friend is gorgeous and has turned down girls who he feels want to use him for sex, in fact, he is very selective for precisely this reason. Everyone is different, and most intelligent people have their own views and beliefs about sexuality that are not dictated by the hive mind.
It would make sense though that you would jump at the chance to fuck a girl if she booty called you because you’re desperate and have been desperate for a long time.
Anyways, good luck to you dude and I hope you find happiness in your life.
http://www.amazon.com/New-Earth-Awakening-Purpose-Selection/dp/0452289963
Np, also I had a bit of a typo in my comment, my pet theory was actually that our higher cognitive function allows us to deviate from primal instinct to some extent but ultimately not enough to where we are perfectly moral, non-animalistic creatures-- we are very much driven by basic need, since that helps us survive and gets propagated throughout generations, the other things our intellect affords us such as awareness of our insignificance in the grand scheme of things or philosophy, art, etc. are just fortunate by-products of our abstraction ability, which was selected due to it's ability to aid us in survival and reproduction, consequently it is subservient to those basic drives.
Some other books I haven't even touched yet (but plan to) but which also have a good reputation:
https://www.amazon.com/Our-Inner-Ape-Primatologist-Explains/dp/1594481962
https://www.amazon.com/Chimpanzee-Politics-Power-among-Apes/dp/0801886562/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_14_t_2?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=6KQC849RMQDHAHCNND0J
https://www.amazon.com/SEX-AT-DAWN-STRAY-MEANS/dp/B00KEVTNSK/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1498547954&sr=1-1&keywords=sex+at+dawn
https://www.amazon.com/What-Do-Women-Want-Adventures/dp/0061906093/ref=pd_sim_14_5?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=0061906093&pd_rd_r=2RBWQA67MBBA734QWF20&pd_rd_w=B1B9p&pd_rd_wg=HueSP&psc=1&refRID=2RBWQA67MBBA734QWF20
https://www.amazon.com/Moral-Animal-Science-Evolutionary-Psychology/dp/0679763996/ref=pd_sim_14_89?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=0679763996&pd_rd_r=Q4WSH2CZDEQX8RASGQ0T&pd_rd_w=oCsRh&pd_rd_wg=mKnBF&psc=1&refRID=Q4WSH2CZDEQX8RASGQ0T
If anyone's curious, there have been more than a few philosophy of biology books from a feminist perspective. The Case of the Female Orgasm made a big splash about a decade ago in critiquing the whole Masters & Johnson legacy on sex. It's an interesting read and the author was a student of Stephen Jay Gould. Not to mention I think some feminists would have a hard time accepting one of its conclusions, that being the male orgasm drove the evolution of the female one.
Also, this is supposed to be pretty good as well, though I can't say I've read it.
Oh look, another post where a guy tries to rationalize being superficial at an age when it's no longer cool.
Education and Attractiveness in Marriage Choices:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2786870.pdf?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Is Beauty in the Eye of the Beholder? (hint: the answer is yes)
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v396/n6709/abs/396321a0.html
Age preferences are more similar than we think, and TRP greatly over-estimates the "mate preferences" of men as they age. Most men prefer 2 - 3 years younger in their twenties, and as they age that gap widens to about 10 - 15 years younger in their 60s.
http://www.amazon.com/Adapting-Minds-Evolutionary-Psychology-Persistent/dp/0262524600
http://spr.sagepub.com/content/15/1/77.short
At age 60, I hope these guys want to protect younger women from creepy guys, rather than BEING the creepy guys.
Well in "Woman: An Intimate Geography" Natalie Angier explains it that mammals traditionally had sex with the man entering from behind the woman ("doggy style", etc.) and so men associated the shape of women's buttocks with sex.
The idea is that women who had large breasts were more likely to have intercourse with men in face to face positions, because the men liked the look of breasts because they reminded them of buttocks. Having sex in face to face positions included more eye contact, which lead to more oxytocin release upon orgasm which lead to stronger pair bonding and love which created a more stable bond between parents and more involvement in children's lives from their father because he was so in love with the mother.
The other hypothesis Angier covers is that breasts are so aesthetically pleasing that women who had spare food or supplies were more likely to give it to the women with bigger breasts.
This sounds goofy, but it's still a really good book.
I see that you're saying that men generally want sex and women generally want commitment, and you believe that when women friend-zone men they are cheating men by taking the commitment and giving nothing in return.
It seems me that you agree that men shouldn't be doing chores for women with the hope that they will get sex in return. I also think a lot of feminists would agree with us that women shouldn't be having sex with men with the hope that they will get commitment in return. They're both foolish ways of thinking.
Here's how we get around the foolish confusion that both men and women bring to relationships: honest communication about feelings and expectations.
Men who feel friendzoned should tell the women (in similar but not necessarily identical words) "I feel hurt because I want our relationship to become something different. I also like you and I feel happy when I'm around you. But I also feel bad about myself because I worry that you're purposely leading me on to hurt and use me"
and women should tell men "I want to have sex with you, and I really like you. But I'm also worried that once we have sex you'll no longer be interested in me, and I don't want to have sex outside of a long-term relationship. Do you think that you're interested in having a long term relationship or do you see us as having a casual relationship?"
If you want more information on how to have these conversations in a socially skilled way, I suggest Difficult Conversations by Douglas Stone
In short, you're right to point out that both men and women don't communicate their expectations with each other well and end up feeling used and cheated as a result. However, I think the solution is more honesty, not less honesty, wouldn't you agree?
excerpts are from here http://www.amazon.com/Sex-Dawn-Prehistoric-Origins-Sexuality/dp/0061707805
>Huh? Even if this is true (which I'm not because it isn't referenced and I haven't done any research on it myself), what is the significance of this? What is biologically better about a larger penis?
If you have a monogamous animal sperm delivery is not a problem. The woman only has one mate, so the body readily accepts the sperm.
However, in promiscuous species the men's sperm needs to compete with other sperm to impregnate the ovum. Only 1-2% of sperm have the goal of actually trying to fertilize the egg, the other sperm are blockers and killers, that seek to stop other men's sperm.
The reason why a large penis is so advantageous is because the penis is shaped so during each thrust it creates a vaccum that pumps out the guy's sperm before hand. Plus the guy can ejaculate in a deeper area of the vagina than other men can.
http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/emir.kamenica/documents/identity.pdf
Oh yeah, I've heard of this before. Pretty sure it comes from the retro book "Fascinating Womanhood".
Notably, it has some other advice about relating to your husband that would make RPWs/TRPs rage, though:
> "like a child who wants too many cookies, a man must be denied [sex] sometimes for his own good."
https://www.amazon.com/Moral-Animal-Science-Evolutionary-Psychology/dp/0679763996
​
https://www.amazon.com/Red-Queen-Evolution-Human-Nature/dp/0060556579
​
https://www.amazon.com/Blank-Slate-Modern-Denial-Nature/dp/0142003344
​
https://www.amazon.com/Sperm-Wars-Infidelity-Conflict-Bedroom/dp/1560258489/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1549572306&sr=1-1&keywords=sperm+wars
​
https://www.amazon.com/Rational-Male-Rollo-Tomassi/dp/1492777862/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1549572332&sr=1-1-fkmr0&keywords=sperm+the+rationale+male
​
https://www.amazon.com/Cosmopolitan-Canopy-Race-Civility-Everyday/dp/0393340511
>That's a shocker
There's men that are completely baffled by women.
http://youtu.be/DHzjgNoRmjg
The book referenced http://www.amazon.com/Men-Mars-Women-Venus-Understanding/dp/0060574216
Sick of feminists having those shirts saying "the future is female" so decided to make one myself that says "the future is male" https://www.amazon.com/dp/B079FKBBWW
Some of these posts may be 2gamma4me.
Snapshots:
^(I am a bot.) ^([Info](/r/SnapshillBot) ^/ ^[Contact](/message/compose?to=\/r\/SnapshillBot))
I'm really sorry about your previous relationship, OP. hugs You're really brave for getting yourself out of that situation.
There's a really great book I've been reading that's been mentioned a lot, here and in other subs like /r/relationships, called
"Why does he do that?" by Lundy Bancroft.
Bancroft is a counsellor who has worked with abusive men to change their behaviours. In the book, he outlines a lot of tactics that abusers use, which are (surprise, surprise) pretty much the same tactics TRPers talk about to win over women.
He also mentions tips that women can use to identify/avoid potential abusers. (I'll see if I can find that section and post it here)
It's a worthwhile read - you should definitely check it out!
Edit: (Some Key Points from Bancroft's "Why Does He Do That" - How Can I Tell if a Man I'm Seeing Will Become Abusive?)
Edit #2: Gilded? Me? Gilded? Oh, wow! I'm all of a dither
breathes into a paper bag
Thank you so much, kind redditor!
Oh, and for those of you looking for Why Does He Do That?, here's a link to Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Why-Does-He-That-Controlling/dp/0425191656