Top products from r/WeAreNotAsking

We found 8 product mentions on r/WeAreNotAsking. We ranked the 7 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the top 20.

Next page

Top comments that mention products on r/WeAreNotAsking:

u/RuffianGhostHorse · 1 pointr/WeAreNotAsking

For Fun: here's My Little Pony Guardians of Harmony Cheese Sandwich Pony with Party Tank.

I've a feeling we're going to need more chickens.

The War-Funding Dem Guardians of Harmony are offering Shit Burgers with Cheese & these Purity Ponies are going to need knocked out with our Party Tanks.

The MSM is out tonight spewing "all hands on deck!"

"Every person stand up & FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT Trump!"

"We're under national emergency!" Well, yeah. We are.

THANKS, HILLARY. THANKS, NANCY. THANKS, CHUCK.

[read those thanks as Fđź–•Y's.]

u/Verum_Dicetur · 1 pointr/WeAreNotAsking

>Excerpts:
>
>This essay is the introduction to Tom Engelhardt’s new book, A Nation Unmade by War, a Dispatch Book published by Haymarket Books.
>
>As I was putting the finishing touches on my new book, the Costs of War Project at Brown University’s Watson Institute published an estimate of the taxpayer dollars that will have gone into America’s war on terror from September 12, 2001, through fiscal year 2018. That figure: a cool $5.6 trillion(including the future costs of caring for our war vets). On average, that’s at least $23,386 per taxpayer.
>
>Keep in mind that such figures, however eye-popping, are only the dollar costs of our wars. They don’t, for instance, include the psychic costs to the Americans mangled in one way or another in those never-ending conflicts. They don’t include the costs to this country’s infrastructure, which has been crumbling while taxpayer dollars flow copiously and in a remarkably – in these years, almost uniquely – bipartisan fashion into what’s still laughably called “national security.” That’s not, of course, what would make most of us more secure, but what would make them – the denizens of the national security state – ever more secure in Washington and elsewhere. We’re talking about the Pentagon, the Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. nuclear complex, and the rest of that state-within-a-state, including its many intelligence agencies and the warrior corporations that have, by now, been fused into that vast and vastly profitable interlocking structure.

u/PracticeMakesPraxis · 2 pointsr/WeAreNotAsking

In Russia Billionaires are "oligarchs" and organized crime is "SUPER MAFIA".

I found an earlier work that may actually be more grounded in reality.

edit:In bird culture, smearing Corbyn like that is considered a dick move.

u/Pandastratton · 3 pointsr/WeAreNotAsking

Trump is better on his feet then liberals give him credit for.. that’s a great quality to have when playing politics..

What do dems have? “Orange man bad” what does trump have PetSafe Bolt Laser Cat Toy, Automatic Laser Cat Toy https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0021L8W6K/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_2-5IDb4X4BN7G

Dems show how full of shit they are when they try and get trump on bullshit.. we are looking for an excuse to can him instead of beating his ass in the field..

Dems do not have the ability to beat him in the field because all their complaints can be used against them.. they are full ass hypocrites..

This is why I support tulsi.. she isn’t in this to say orang man bad.. she’s in it for us.. beating trump isn’t the mission, empowering and protecting Americans is the mission..

To average voters.. dems want to tax you more, and take away your rights and hate on everything America.. republicans want to lower taxes, shoot guns and have screaming eagles with American flags..

If we were serious about winning we would change our image.. we love our country and only want to make it better.. we shouldn’t get lost in the weeds trying to please specific constituencies.. (looking at you warren) dems need a little more empathy for their fellow American.. we are all doing the best we can even if that isn’t good enough..

u/atallglass · 1 pointr/WeAreNotAsking

>
>
>A mainstream media and academic expert this week issued a rare admission: that pretty much everything the establishment has fed the public on Syria is false or distorted; but it remains that after tragic eight-year long war is slowly coming to a close, new indisputable facts are coming to light. "Truth did not matter at all," he admits after years of providing commentary for mainstream publications.
>
>In a lengthy thread on Twitter, counter-terrorism author and assistant professor of political science and public policy at Northeastern University Max Abrahms exposed how he saw the 'narrative managers' at work from the inside of the establishment think tank world and media. As his own research came to uncover and document the truth of what was happening in Syria, "the media would excise me and the research from their stories" he revealed. His work in the early years of the war appeared in The New York Times and other major outlets, however, he was increasingly censored and pushed out of a number of platforms for speaking inconvenient truths. 
>
>Below is his full commentary, written in the wake of the new OPCW leaks which the mainstream is still trying hard to ignore.