(Part 4) Top products from r/berkeley

Yeah the book was eventually made, but it was rather quietly released without the publicity Kerr had hoped. You can buy a copy of the original 1967 edition on Amazon amazingly.

(edit: It appears that the 2012 freshmen did get a special gift copy of Fiat Lux, which makes me quite jealous. It also makes me wonder why the school doesn't have the book on sale in the Cal Student Store– I'm sure a lot of people would buy it.)

HW 1&2 are probably logic, proof methods and induction. These are very basic stuff that should always be the same. Course might have changed in advanced material. For example, when I took CS70, we saw Graph Theory, Countability, some Computability and a little Measure; but these are not necessarily thought every semester. Also, probability part (as far as I understand) change pretty profoundly (it is the very last part of the course).

When I took CS70 I went over this textbook: https://www.amazon.com/Discrete-Mathematics-Applications-Kenneth-Rosen/dp/0072899050 but I must say the course was significantly harder than this textbook; and homeworks and class notes were much more beneficial than this book.

Bearded guy here. I'm not averse to paying someone to groom me, if that person does a better job than I can. But I've had only bad experiences. Temescal Alley, where I've gotten great haircuts, once fucked my beard up so severely they didn't charge me for the haircut either. Fellow Barber once gave me a great haircut, then as she was trimming my beard, confessed she's only done this a few times before in her life. It showed!

My advice? Get a good-quality pair of clippers and do it yourself. This Wahl haircut kit is one of the best $20 I've ever spent. Comes with a million different guards, so you can choose the length that's right for you. Do that once a week for the dapper look.

:) Nice picture.

I brought the bubbles. If anyone else wants more bubbles, they're totally worth getting from Amazon. http://www.amazon.com/Funrise-32417-Gazillion-Bubble-Machine/dp/B000197NXM/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1321461356&sr=8-2

> That is a smug statement.

That's a perfect indirect answer to my question: you will read seemingly anything as smugness. I'm not well versed enough in psychology to know how to explain that, though. A shot in the dark might be a superiority complex, that any tiny iota of challenge to a feeling or superiority would appear as an affront.

> Actually I like doing this

If you do, then I really want to recommend this book to you. It's a short read, and very worthwhile. From all your previous statements, and what we discussed about, I already thought that it would be a good recommendation for you, but with that last comment, well, you reveal so much about yourself.

> That's an incredibly smug statement.

According to the dictionary definition, no. But, as is the usual course of internet arguments go, it now devolves into semantics: perhaps you are working on an "emergent" or "personal" definition of smugness.

Spray Liquid Ass on the bench.

My bad, I didn't notice the delivery options. Crazy that Amazon could have stocking issues from how big the wildfire problems are.

​

You can also try mixing up search terms for disposable/nondisposable masks and higher NIOSH ratings - there's one $20ish for an older 3M half mask model + 3M P100 cartridges, one and two day shipping available if I read it right.