(Part 2) Top products from r/european

well yes sir, you are making some valid points.

Interesting fact, the American founders, were the puritans, the idea that America was founded on freadom is a marketing lie. They floked to America because they felt that Europe was too Free!
The governments refused to bring down the harsh dictacts that those bible junkies demanded, so they said screw you to Europe..we gon' start our own country.

America was settled (initially) not by people who wanted less rules (and more freedom) but believed in more rules (and less freedom)... tho don't mention that to an American because it will likely confuse them...their education system being what it is.

tho in honesty..regarding your first point.."the concept of state [...] is foreign to people outside europe"
its upside down my friend...
there is a brilliant book called the breaking of nations (http://www.amazon.com/The-Breaking-Nations-Twenty-First-Century/dp/0802141641)..

Europe being at the fore front of Global culture as it has always been, is the first (and only) region that exists in a Post-nationalist phase...(thats nothing to do with the political idiology of 'nationalism' btw)...Peace through transparency...it's a beautilful thing.

it is (i swear down) everywhere else that is only able to percieve the world through the close minded port holes of nationalism (again not to be confused with political right-wing nationalism) and Europe alone that has managed to truly begin upon the road of...
"these people and my people, my neighbours and my neighbours neighbours, we are all brother-cousins and we will stand together, stand strong, hold each other to account, and while FULLY ACCEPTING OUR DIFFERENCES protect and fight for that which we hold common.

freedom to do what the fuck you like.

yes...you are right, due to the escelated influx of people with a different mindset (read religion) it is a chalange for our governements....

but do not for a moment think that there are not smart people now working on this, yes, slow to take action, but the action they will take will be of a nature that will be both effective and powerful and cause ripples in the wider world

(spoiler, its going to be a major push to promote the teachings of the Quran over the teachings of the Hadith...with the ultimate goal to raise Islam out of it's medival way by promoting it's own holy book as holy - if you ever read the Quran, you wil see it is the most hippy book ever (doesn't even ban alcohol, only says "spend no more than your surplus on drinking and gambling, and think about it)...all the incompatible islam things are from the Hadith)

through their own religion will they be indoctrinated to our ways.


as for Africa...yea you are right in part.
truth be told, abandoning Africa was the biggest dick move European governments could do.

because instead of Christian governemnts running africa, who were bound by morals, and public oversight, the continent was left to be run by corperations, with no oversight, and profit as their only moral..

Africa is pretty much owned by china now tho, Europe dropped the ball on what could/should have been a golden oppertunity

Agreed. Kevin MacDonald's work is very important for understanding what is happening to the Western World, especially the United States. To anyone with a basic facility for pattern matching, it is obvious that Jews are disproportionately involved in efforts that are against the ethnic interests of Europeans and European-derived diaspora peoples. If in doubt, just look at the surnames of those involved in the effort to turn Europe and European diaspora states into Multicultural Secular Theocracies. It's clear that Ashkenazic surnames are highly over-represented among every movement that promotes this process.

What MacDonald's trilogy gives us is a persuasive model for why this is happening by introducing the concept of the "Jewish-dominated intellectual movement" and grounding it in sociobiological theory. This goes far in improving our understanding of this process without resorting to tired conspiracy theories. According to MacDonald's theory, many of the intellectual movements that have contributed to the atomization and de-ethnization of European communities, from Feminism to Whiteness Studies, were founded by Jews as an implicit way of weakening Western society. However, this isn't the result of innate moral wickedness. Simply put, the Ashkenazim, with their higher innate intelligence and higher level of ethnocentrism, are better at advocating for and achieving their ethnic interests within the context of modern mass society than we are. According to sociobiological theory, it is in their interests to pursue these ends at our expense. BTW, this isn't just pseudoscience, even some of the most respected sociobiologists basically agree with MacDonald on this point.

And speaking as an American, exceedingly few of us are aware that these torahless Ashkenazim have largely replaced the role that Anglo-Saxon Protestants once had as the core of the American elite. Many Americans, I think, sense that something is deeply wrong with modern American society. That is, they're aware that the American elite loathes traditional Anglo/Christian culture with a passion. But few understand that this is likely because today the WASP ascendancy that founded the country has been replaced by what MacDonald describes as a Jewish-dominated "hostile elite" that does not identify with the people it rules. This has even been noticed and commented upon by some self-critical Jewish intellectuals in the United States, both leftwingers such as Philip Weiss and rightwingers such as Lawrence Auster, as well as mixed race academics such as Eric Kaufmann. Naturally, with the USA as the sole superpower, this fact has important consequences, not just for Americans of Christian European descent, but for all Western countries that are effective satellite states of the USA. After all, history shows that whatever intellectual movement has its start in America eventually finds a home in Europe.

However, with that said, I also think that MacDonald and his adherents go way too far in ascribing blame for what ails us soley to the Jews. To me it is obvious that liberal Jewish communities such as the ones advocating for Syrian refugee settlement in the EU, are assimilating to a universalist/open borders/one world ideology, that as Mencius Moldbug has argued, has its origins in liberal American Mainline Protestant Christianity. This assimilation process is so far along today that it is difficult to tell exactly what values separate liberal Protestant Christians from these lunatic tikkun olam Jews such as George Soros. Anti-semites completely ignore this process, however, since it blows a hole in their worldview. After all, how is it in the interest of European Jews to flood the countries they reside in with anti-semitic Arabs? That doesn't make any sense. They also ignore the complicating issue of intermarriage between Jews and Gentiles.

So although I think MacDonald's theories are an important contribution to understanding the psychology behind European dispossession, I think that ethnic self-interest on the part of Jews only explains part of the problem. I basically agree with Paul Gottfried that we've completely "lost our cotton-picking minds." But whatever you think of the origin of this ideology being peddled by tikkun olam Jews, it must be admitted that it has a strangely powerful resonance amongst us and we need to find out why that is to effectively combat it.

The 'commonly known' version of modern history is written from a very specific angle...

For a gentle intro to reality start with Pat Buchanan's book.

> I think there's going to be coups soon in western countries within 20 years if the people don't get their heads straight. I think the military knows what they need to do, and might step in.

France didn't care about this: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3435772/Former-commander-French-Foreign-Legion-75-arrested-Pegida-protest-Calais.html

Why would the French military men start growing a pair in the future? Don't you guys get it? It's over. http://www.amazon.com/Death-West-Populations-Immigrant-Civilization/dp/0312302592/

We are witnessing the SPOILS (women, welfare, housing, education, medicine) being divvied up between the VICTORS (various third-world tribes under the banner of Islamofascism).

In Eastern Europe there may be military coups to get out of the EU and setup strong borders against Western European third-worlders (who will soon be on the move for fresher economies and women to exploit). These coups will be quickly squashed by a militarized EU and NATO.

Western Europe is lost. You guys need to get that into your heads. Even if all third-worlders left today, suicidal degeneracy will destroy what's left because the CORE of the West is ROTTEN.

Ask yourselves, what's left to protect? Gay rights? Feminism? Self-hate? Transgenderism? Crony-capitalism? Soulless consumerism? No wonder European men don't bother lifting a finger for the women anymore. http://russia-insider.com/en/rts-anissa-naouai-interviews-iben-thranholm/ri12471

Europeans have checked out.

Susan Miller Okin

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Multiculturalism-Women-Susan-Moller-Okin/dp/0691004323

Here's a copypasta of a former redditor I always enjoy pasting in those situations.

>"Gender" in the way you use it (outside of being a "grammatical construct") doesn't exist, it was made up by a proto-SJW named "John Money", who coined what is today known as "gender theory" or "gender is a social construct" for that.
Biologically speaking there is only masculine and feminine with some abberations, assumed to be because of hormone imbalances during pregnanices and similar effects, actual scientists have been trying to advance science in those areas to be able to more accurately tell if a baby is male or female in these special cases, but it seems hard since their findings conflict with social scientists talking out of their ass like the Psychologist guy you linked and their "gender ideology" often making such research a taboo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFYfZg1jsJU

>http://www.amazon.co.uk/Prenatal-Testosterone-Mind-Amniotic-Bradford/dp/0262524562

>Before John Money, the concept of "gender" didn't exist, in English it was just used as the grammatical counterpart for the latin "genus".
>If you want to read more about him, notice the David Reimer case and what he thinks about pedos near the end of the article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money#Controversies
>He basically pressured the parents of a child with disfigured genitalia after a failed operation without any scientific basis to stand on to have his "member" removed at a very early age because his theory was that the environmental part of the upbringing will take care of the rest and he will “identify as a girl”, upon which he apparently suffered from the consequences of said decision based on that belief throughout his entire childhood and into his adult life having psychological problems and suicidal thoughts (and finally killing himself), nonetheless this theory and thought pattern still persists today.
>The entire social sciences field, and unfortunately even some hard sciences started adopting the term "gender" after his experiments with children, which as described above failed in a big way but he declared as a success anyway, making him the originator of “gender theory” in the social sciences: http://www.oeb.harvard.edu/faculty/haig/Publications_files/04InexorableRise.pdf
>There was also a BBC documentary regarding this very incident if you are interested to know more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUTcwqR4Q4Y
>And there was another documentary called "Brainwashing" by Harald Eia that featured an Intersex case in the episode "Nature vs. Nurture", it starts about 15 minutes in and shows another medical doctor that seems to actually care and wants to improve the situation but is contradicted by your usual "social sciences/gender studies" types with the usual SJW bullshit, it's a very interesting episode dealing with the "Nature vs. Nurture" argument: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xp14wz_hjernevask-brainwashing-english-part-7-nature-vs-nurture_news