(Part 2) Top products from r/rareinsults
We found 2 product mentions on r/rareinsults. We ranked the 22 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the products ranked 21-40. You can also go back to the previous section.
We found 2 product mentions on r/rareinsults. We ranked the 22 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the products ranked 21-40. You can also go back to the previous section.
I wonder if Bruce Canon Gibney, David Willetts, Joseph Sternberg, and PJ O'Rourke (for God's sake!) are all also part of this troll farm, or just unwitting dupes. 🤔
Like basically all questions of evolutionary psychology, there are no "correct"/"incorrect" answers or "definitive" sources. There's just different scientists with different opinions that are based on a lot of assumptions. Since I wasn't the one who claimed there was a "consensus", I'm not going to go through the big effort of tracking down all the sources out there, but I double-majored in psych and behavorial neuroscience so I know that there's a a lot, on all sides. I'm not trying to argue for a particular stance, just arguing against the idea that there is a "consensus". There's a lot more to this field than just Sex at Dawn.
You've gotta look at comparative neuroanatomy (we have similar wiring to other monogamous species), anthropological records (humans have a track record of monogamy that is much longer than 1000 years and a record of pair-bonding that is older than marriage), contemporary psychological analyses (men experience more psychological damage than women do when infidelity strikes, women are attracted to different kinds of men depending on the time of the month) etc. as all pieces of a puzzle. It's not a simple cut-and-dry thing so skepticism is warranted.
If you're genuinely looking for something to read that takes a stand for monogamy, I enjoyed this book: Love Sense by Dr. Sure Johnson.