(Part 2) Top products from r/rstats

Jump to the top 20

We found 22 product mentions on r/rstats. We ranked the 46 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the products ranked 21-40. You can also go back to the previous section.

Next page

Top comments that mention products on r/rstats:

u/flibbertygibbit · 4 pointsr/rstats

From one R newbie to another, I have found the website Quick-R to be the most helpful. I was roped into using R on my thesis and have had to learn everything as I go, so I don't have the background that a lot of other R users do. That said, it's nice to have a condensed, plain-english reference without all the alphabet soup of theory.

I also use A Beginner's Guide to R to figure out the basic stuff and R in Action for more advanced topics. I don't know what your statistical background is, but you should also try to find a solid stats book related to your field.

As a last bit, and this may not be a popular sentiment on this sub, but I have found very little help through the r-help files, mailing lists, or stackoverflow. Most times the posts are written by and for people with much greater ability than mine so I have a really hard time gleaning any useful information. Also, I have found that there are a lot of condescending attitudes throughout and it's soured me to those sources. In my experience, the R community at large is not very friendly towards beginners.

Good luck on your adventuRe.

u/sebastax · 1 pointr/rstats

If you want to know just the practical use:

The closest the R2 goes to 1, the better the model. For example, an R2 of, say, 0.82 means: "82% of the variation of the dependent variable is explained by the variation of the dependent variables". Conversely, the less the R2, the less the predictive power of the dependent variables.

In order to evaluate the significance of each variable, you have to check the P values. The practical meaning is: the lower the p-value, the more useful is the variable. For example, a p-value of, say, 0.01 means the variable is very significant, and therefore should be implemented in the model. The level of significance of course depends on your work.

edit: If you want to know the theory, take a look at this. It is one of the best books. https://www.amazon.com/Basic-Econometrics-Damodar-Gujarati/dp/0073375772

u/enilkcals · 9 pointsr/rstats

My advice would be to find a dataset for yourself that you wish to analyse in some manner and work through that using the references you have and Stackoverflow to search for solutions to problems you encounter (and asking when you can't find a solution).

This is because, in my experience, most exercises are canned and have perfect working solutions provided, yet when you get to the real world working on your own data things are never perfect and you will have a lot of problems to solve.

One very useful thing I can recommend is to start learning how to use Knitr as a basis for making your work-flow from importing data through to producing reports (in LaTeX or HTML via R markdown) completely reproducible.

A couple of useful references though are the following books which all have R examples...

u/socialpsychonline · 7 pointsr/rstats

I can recommend Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence by Judith Singer & John Willett.

The second half of the book considers survival analysis, and R code for the examples from each chapter of the book are available here -- in addition to code for SAS, SPSS Stata, etc.

Full disclosure: I have only worked through the first half of the book so far (growth curve modeling), but the text is very complete and the code on that webpage has been really helpful. I imagine the section on survival analysis is similarly helpful.

u/Luonnon · 3 pointsr/rstats

If you're moving from academia, chances are any code you've written has been to get the computer to do something. Software development is more about writing code for other people to read and work with... which also happens to do what you want it to do. You might want to make sure you have the basics of software engineering practices down by reading Code Complete and Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software.

Beyond that, if you have a solid project or two that you can talk about the ins and outs of, it shouldn't be hard to convince a company that you can analyze data and write code to automate or otherwise help with that process.

u/bobbyfiend · 2 pointsr/rstats

Another excellent book is CAR. I really like it. In addition to the regression content it teaches a good number of practices and tricks in working with R.

u/Calibandage · 2 pointsr/rstats

Deep Learning With Python is very good for practical application, as is the course at fast.ai. For theory, people love Goodfellow.

u/urmyheartBeatStopR · 2 pointsr/rstats

> I'd like to know, how did you learn to use R?

My batshit crazy lovable thesis advisor was teaching intro datascience in R.

He can't really lecture and he have high expectation. The class was for everybody including people that don't know how to program. The class book was advance R http://adv-r.had.co.nz/... (red flag).

We only survived this class because I had a cs undergrad background and I gave the class a crash course once. Our whole class was more about how to implement his version of random forest.

I learned R because we had to implement a version of Random forest with Rpart package and then create a package for it.

Before this a dabble in R for summer research. It was mostly cleaning data.

So my advice would be to have a project and use R.

>how did you learn statistics?

Master program using the wackerly book and chegg/slader. (https://www.amazon.com/Mathematical-Statistics-Applications-Dennis-Wackerly/dp/0495110817)

It's a real grind. You need to learn probability first before even going into stat. Wackerly was the only real book that break down the 3 possible transformations (pdf,cdf, mgf).

u/sven_ftw · 1 pointr/rstats

I really enjoy using this book for reference material. It depends on what you are trying to learn, though. You won't find code examples in it.

What you will find, however, is a ton of different methods and examples of how to apply them (contextually). You'd probably need to have a least a basic idea of how to begin the analysis to make it useful. (For instance, I'm modeling a binary event, I need a logit or probit, start w/ that chapter; or I'm modeling a rank, Tobit).

u/Kacawi · 1 pointr/rstats

As a book for beginning R programmers, I would recommend The Art of R Programming: A Tour of Statistical Software Design, written by Norman Matloff. As a general machine learning book, I liked this book, written by Peter Flach.

u/norsurfit · 1 pointr/rstats

Three very good introductory textbooks for statistics are:

Mendenhall, Statistics https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Probability-Statistics-William-Mendenhall/dp/1133103758

Larson and Farber https://www.amazon.com/Elementary-Statistics-Picturing-World-Books/dp/0321901118

Peck and Devore https://www.amazon.com/Statistics-Exploration-Analysis-Available-Titles/dp/0840058012

Buy used, older editions of each, and you can get them very cheap. These are all well explained, beginner texts.

u/jacobcvt12 · 3 pointsr/rstats

Both JAGS and BUGS use the same language and can perform very similar operations. JAGS is more portable across operating systems, so for that reason, I would suggest JAGS (BUGS is generally limited to Windows). However, documentation/blog posts/forum posts (which exist in abundance!) for both languages will generally work for either tool. If you are looking for a textbook, Doing Bayesian Data Analysis provides a nice introduction to both bayesian statistics as well as JAGS.

Outside of JAGS/BUGS, there exists another similar language for performing Bayesian statistics called Stan (also described in the above book). Stan is newer, and often times will "run faster" than JAGS, however it does not directly support as many types of analyses.

My advice would be to learn JAGS while simultaneously learning the basics of Bayesian methods. Once you understand the basics of JAGS, try exploring Stan!

u/cokechan · 2 pointsr/rstats

https://www.amazon.com/Analysis-Regression-Multilevel-Hierarchical-Models/dp/052168689X is the definitive text on the subject. I highly recommend this book to understand the fundamentals of multilevel modeling.

u/editorijsmi · 2 pointsr/rstats

you check the following book

Forecasting models – an overview with the help of R software : Time series - Past ,Present and Future

https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07VFY53B1 (E-Book)

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1081552808 (Paperback)

ISBN: 9781081552800

u/grandzooby · 1 pointr/rstats

You might check out Dr. Gerbing's work at Portland State U. He teaches stats in the business school and uses R.

http://www.pdx.edu/sba/david-gerbing

He even wrote a textbook you might find useful:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0415657202/

I haven't read it yet, so I don't know how helpful it will be.

u/mghoff330 · 3 pointsr/rstats

Mostly Harmless Econometrics is a classic. It gets into regression, but also design with inference in mind. Combine that with ISLR and you should be set!