(Part 2) Top products from r/trashy

This is really common - if you donate a body to science it goes where it's needed. The entire body isn't needed for research in one place so the remains can be parted out as needed.

I highly recommend the book Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers - it talks about the options out there for our bodies after we die, and manages to be light-hearted but respectful at the same time. It's really one of my favorite books

Variations on a theme, from 'The Shocker' by Chad Brody, alternate names for Two in the Pink,...
from Amazons product description:
>The Shocker: Two in the Pink, One in the Stink comes in two parts. Part I is a brief-but-intense theory and background of The Shocker, which serves as the first, only, and most authoritative work ever produced on the subject. Part II is a collection of 365 hilarious variations on The Shocker rhyme; enough for every day of the year! A perfect gift or bathroom reader, The Shocker will provide you and your friends with hours of laughter. Just beware any sneaky pinkies! Examples from Part II Two in the Blossom, One in the Awesome Two in the Child, One in the Wild Two in the Flirty, One in the Hurty Two in the Eat, One in the Seat Two in the Snail, One in the Tail Two in the Squirt, One in the Hurt Two in the Funs, One in the Runs Two in the Classy, One in the Gassy Two in the Gap, One in the Crap Two in the Dame, One in the Shame Two in the Sludge, One in the Fudge Two in the Party, One in the Farty Two in the F***, One in the Yuck Two in the Blood, One in the Mud Two in the Pimp, One in the Limp Two in the Kids, One in the Skids Two in the Bush, One in the Tush Two in the Drip, One in the Rip Two in the Fold, One in the Gold Two in the Easy, One in the Sleazy Two in the Wet, One in the Regret Two in the Pregger, One in the Beggar Two in the Humper, One in the Dumper Two in the Beaver, One in the Fever Two in the Porn, One in the Corn...

People go to college, dress well and are on time.

Class is sublime. Class is what makes us "better" than animals. Class is what can't be bought, it has to be earned.

I've read quite a few books on class and they're fascinating, I highly recommend this one https://www.amazon.com/Class-Through-American-Status-System/dp/0671792253 also https://www.amazon.com/Social-Class-Stratification-Society-Now/dp/0415041252

There's actually quite a few other treatments that are better without the side effects... Like working out...

https://www.amazon.com/Depression-Cure-6-Step-Program-without/dp/0738213888

"Check it out guys they wrote a whole book about those Marvel movies!"

...thanks!

I read a lot of books about these sorts of...things. If you like reading about, er, this topic, two of my favourite non-academic reads on the topic are "Random Family" and "Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women put Motherhood Before Marriage." Both are really well-written -- "Random Family" is riveting -- and the writers are sympathetic to their subjects without making excuses for them, and they explain a lot of often inexplicable stuff.

Really cool that you're bringing that up! I've recently read this book https://www.amazon.com/Field-Blood-Violence-Congress-Civil/dp/0374154775

It completely changed my perspective on the mythical civility of "the old times" vis-a-vis the current times.

It’s not believe all women, it’s believe 98% of women. Read this book if you’d like to learn more! https://www.amazon.com/Missoula-Rape-Justice-System-College/dp/0385538731/ref=nodl_

Can I recommend this?

The story is from this book. The story, word for word, is written out on page 260.

https://www.amazon.com/Third-World-America-Politicians-Abandoning/dp/0307719960

https://www.amazon.com/Blood-Lies-Evidence-Accusation-Bloodlands/dp/0692200991

https://www.amazon.com/Nazi-Propaganda-Arab-World-Preface/dp/0300168055

https://www.ushmm.org/research/publications/academic-publications/full-list-of-academic-publications/nazi-palestine-the-plans-for-the-extermination-of-the-jews-of-palestine

https://www.amazon.com/Arab-Responses-Fascism-Nazism-Attraction/dp/1477307575

http://www.matthiaskuentzel.de/contents/nazi-germany-and-the-antisemitism-in-the-muslim-world

https://www.amazon.com/Undeclared-Wars-Israel-Germany-1967-1989-ebook/dp/B01DPNK5PS/ref=sr_1_2?keywords=jeffrey+herf&qid=1550941215&s=books&sr=1-2

first point by point, ignoring your flippant little quip:
-yes, leftists were sent to camps, etc, how does that in any way negate anything i said, or solidify your argument? hitler hated socialists but
-not all leftists are socialists, but all socialists are leftists.
-anarchists can technically align themselves with leftism (contradiction) (look at antifa) but at its core anarchism is extreme right wing because it advocates for a complete lack of government or institutions
-the swastika was the logo of the nazi party, who sought to force societal change through collectivism, a basic tenant of leftism, and therefore not a right wing group. (that would be actual anarchists)

furthermore how is nazism NOT left wing? it advocates for the same kind of state controlled economy as socialism, its short for national socialism! hitler detested capitalism, which is as right wing as it gets. Traditionalism, militarism, nationalism, are NOT inherently right-wing.

have you read mein kampf? hitler literally talks about being inspired by RADICAL LEFT WING MOVEMENTS (communists, socialists, etc) and how it shaped his doctrine. he says it himself! how he learned what worked for them (political violence) and learned how to apply it to his own ends. he was inspired to a large degree by the face of fascism: mussolini, a former marxist! inspired by marx, engels, hegel, all leftists


some evidence and reading:

""Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State…. The Fascist conception of the State is all embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value.
—Gentile, Mussolini “A Doctrine of Fascism”"
http://www.worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Germany/mussolini.htm

http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks02/0200601.txt

https://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Fascism-American-Mussolini-Politics/dp/0767917189

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/417926




basically in short the political spectrum most people use is wrong, it is Totalitarianism (collective) ------- Total Anarchy (individual)

in 20th century europe, fascism was indeed "right wing" compared to communism

Here's a book:

https://www.amazon.com/Sperm-Wars-Evolutionary-Logic-Love/dp/0465081800/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1357531714&sr=8-2&keywords=sperm+wars

Or you know you can Google about it yourself. It's rude to make an argument, provide nothing factual to back it up, then demand the other side to do their research.

Literally everyone does it
Meanwhile, masturbation is taught to be a shameful practice. That is wrong and the only way to change how it's viewed is to talk about it. Nothing gets solved by ignoring uncomfortable subjects.

I will suck my boyfriend's dick. Not sure why you're bringing your homophobia to the table too.

You clearly aren't as funny as you think you are.

>but also by refusing to support politicians and policies that end up with children and non-violent offenders being kept in cages.

I'm sure you were so vocal about it during the Obama administration.

>You gotta be a real Adolph Hitler to see the way republicans talk about illegal immigration and think "You know? They're right! Immigrants might be the source of any of my problems!"

Hitler killed his own citizens and kept them in Germany and didn't let them escape. Sensible people understand that you can't just allow anyone who can to walk across the border. If you don't think that there are issues with dumping millions of low-skilled, low-wage people on an economy then you truly don't understand basic economics. https://smile.amazon.com/Basic-Economics-Thomas-Sowell/dp/0465060730/ref=sr_1_3?crid=2DJ90441VKI47&keywords=basic+economics&qid=1555965349&s=gateway&sprefix=basic+e%2Caps%2C169&sr=8-3

Again, educate yourself.

This and FAS are two of the most insidious things we use to stigmatize and demonize poor women for being poor and suffering the consequences of poverty.

​

> It turns out that only about 5% of alcoholic women give birth to babies who are later diagnosed with FAS. This means that many mothers drink excessively, and many more drink somewhat (at least 16 percent of mothers drink during pregnancy), and yet many, many children born to these women show no diagnosable signs of FAS. Twin studies, further, have shown that sometimes one fraternal twin is diagnosed with FAS, but the other twin, who shared the same uterine environment, is fine.
>
>So, drinking during pregnancy does not appear to be a sufficient cause of FAS, even if it is a necessary cause (by definition?). In her book, Conceiving Risk, Bearing Responsibility, sociologist and public health scholar Elizabeth M. Armstrong explains that FAS is not just related to alcohol intake, but is “highly correlated with smoking, poverty, malnutrition, high parity [i.e., having lots of children], and advanced maternal age” (p. 6). Further, there appears to be a genetic component. Some fetuses may be more vulnerable than others due to different ways that bodies breakdown ethanol, a characteristic that may be inherited. (This may also explain why one fraternal twin is affected, but not the other.)
>
>To sum, drinking alcohol during pregnancy appears to contribute to FAS, but it by no means causes FAS.
>
>And yet… almost all public health campaigns, whether sponsored by states, social movement organizations, public health institutes, or the associations of alcohol purveyors tell pregnant women not to drink alcohol during, before, or after pregnancy… at all… or else.
>
>[...] But “women” do not cause FAS. Neither does alcohol. This strategy replaces addressing all of the other problems that correlate with the appearance of FAS — poverty, stress, and other kinds of social deprivation — in favor of policing women. FAS, in fact, is partly the result of individual behavior, partly the result of social inequality, and partly genetic, but our entire eradication strategy focuses on individual behavior. It places the blame and responsibility solely on women.