Top products from r/tulsi

Yes there is! read The Management of Savagery

Fully sourced history of how we got to this screwed up point.

This one? Page says May of 2021 :(

https://www.amazon.com/Today-Day-Tulsi-Gabbard-ebook/dp/B07J6J1D1H/

Also, for fun, look up fan videos for Tulsi Wonder Woman.

That's scary

I want openess with my country's leaders, not a smiling face and a hidden hand

Damn, that's fucked up to bring up Affirmative Action as your only example of racial discrimination... This says to me you are only concerned about issues that hurt white people. I'd suggest reading this book if you wish to learn more on the subject.

So, clearly nobody commenting and blindly up-voting realizes this is just an except from this book by a Stanford classics professor. Here's a good summary instead of a picture with an incendiary headline, and here's an excerpt from that summary (just read the summary) so you can see that this is actually a non-fiction history book... It's frankly embarrassing that this is being up-voted.
>In the Stone Age, humans were a rough lot. When people 10,000 years ago disagreed, they usually solved their arguments without violence; but when they did decide to use force, they faced far fewer constraints than the citizens of functioning modern states. Violence was normally on a small scale, in homicides, vendettas, and raids, but because populations were also tiny, the steady drip of killing took an appalling toll. By many estimates, 10 to 20% of Stone Age humans died at other people's hands.If we fast-forward to the 20th century, we see a stunning contrast. The century suffered world wars, genocides, and nuclear attacks, not to mention civil strife, riots, and murders. Altogether, we killed a staggering 100-200 million of our own kind. But between 1900 and 2000, roughly 10 billion lives were lived -- meaning that just 1-2% of the world's population died violently.
So if you were lucky enough to be born in the 20th century, your risk of dying violently was just one-tenth of that in the Stone Age; and since 2000, the United Nations tells us, the risk of violent death has fallen even further, to 0.7%.
These are astonishing statistics, but the explanation is more astonishing still. In perhaps the greatest paradox in history, what made the world safer was war itself.
What happened, it seems, is that starting about 10,000 years ago, the winners of wars began incorporating the losers into larger societies. The victors then found that the only way to make these larger societies work was by developing stronger governments; and one of the first things these governments had to do, if they wanted to stay in power, was suppress violence among their subjects. he men who ran these governments cracked down on killing not because they were saints, but because well-behaved subjects were easier to govern and tax than angry, murderous ones. States that suppressed violence within their borders tended to grow; those that did not, tended to fail.
War is surely the worst possible way to create larger, more peaceful societies, but the depressing truth is that it seems to be pretty much the only way people have found.