(Part 3) Top products from r/woahdude

Jump to the top 20

We found 20 product mentions on r/woahdude. We ranked the 217 resulting products by number of redditors who mentioned them. Here are the products ranked 41-60. You can also go back to the previous section.

Next page

Top comments that mention products on r/woahdude:

u/NicotineGumAddict · 2 pointsr/woahdude

he is saying both sort of. life has no meaning, but meaning isn't found within the struggle exactly, rather we exist in between the struggle and we create our own meaning. we are free, we have only to realize that the rules don't apply.

I can give you some advice for reading existentialism and also some places to start.

just curious, tho, how old are you?

there's several ways to approach reading philosophy.

method 1:
when reading philosophy of any kind you can get bogged down in the references and footnotes. when I was just starting out I would get so overwhelmed by things I didn't understand I would give up. don't give up. and don't worry about what you don't understand, just keep reading and see what you get out of it.

method 2:
BEFORE you read a book, read the Wikipedia page on it. back in the day I had to collect Coppleston's history of philosophy volumes to read commentary, but now it's online. so before you read, do some quick background reading so you know a) where the author is coming from/their general point of view/any important details about their life that pertain to understanding the book B) the author's main argument in the book - this will help you pick out his argument and understand it better.

3) some tips: a) read for pleasure. don't feel bad if you hate a book and just can't read it or make sense of it. sometimes later it makes more sense, but it's ok to hate a writer even if everyone else says they're amazing b) read with a pen or pencil in hand - underline things you like, write "I disagree" if you do, sometimes I even write "LOL" if it made me laugh and related to that B) take some notes as you go along whatever you think is important.. a sentence, a point, I use notes to restate in my own words the argument I just read... it helps me get it better and I have a reference in my own lingo that makes sense to me

where to start I would start with two books:

  1. Donald Palmer "does the center hold? an intro to western philosophy"
    Amazon price ~2$

    get this book if you get no others!

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0073535753/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?qid=1462783700&sr=8-2&pi=SY200_QL40&keywords=does+the+center+hold&dpPl=1&dpID=51hxbBbmgzL&ref=plSrch


    2.Walter Kaufmann "existentialism: from Dostoyevsky to Sartre"
    Amazon price 11$

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0452009308/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?qid=1462783302&sr=8-2&pi=SY200_QL40&keywords=walter+kaufmann&dpPl=1&dpID=41lkh1kWkeL&ref=plSrch

    after that, depends on what you want to learn, but after the above I would read "Notes from Underground" by Dostoyevsky

    then maybe: JD Salinger "Catcher in the Rye"

    this was how I learned... after those two I went back chronologically and read Plato(he's foundational and easy enough to grasp), Kierkegaard, Dostoyesky, Camus and Sartre, then I started skipping around once I had a foundation.

    with existentialism the important thing to remember is that it isn't an exact philosophy. it was at first a reaction against exact philosophies with prescriptive definitions to how we should live. existentialism, rather, is a shared angst (Wikipedia Kierkegaard Angst) about life, an anxiety in the face of the meaninglessness of life. life has no meaning. now what? if life has no meaning, then all the rules are arbitrary, and you are truly free. free to do and be whatever you want.

    good luck on your quest, it's a worthy one.

    and my last piece of advice is this: there's no hurry... if a book takes you a year to digest, that's fine! if another takes you a week, ok! another might require 2 months. don't rush, digest the argument and internalize it.

    and I'm around on Reddit all the time if you have questions. and don't let philosophy snobs tells you you have to blah blah blah... philosophy should be accessible to all, otherwise it's a stupid endeavor.

    again.. good luck.
u/egypturnash · 1 pointr/woahdude

Start doing crude little shorts with the resources you have. If you have your own computer then you probably have SOME way of getting a bunch of still images into it and putting them together in a video editing program; there's a few programs out there that can do that. Use toys, Lego, jam armatures into stuffed animals, whatever, just start animating. Make little shorts, take random lines of dialogue and animate to them, parody scenes from popular movies you like, whatever. Build a body of work. Post it to Youtube. Find other people learning to animate - preferably stop-motion, but other 2D amateurs will have something worth saying as well - and trade critiques. Oh hey there's even /r/stop_motion, I dunno how good it is but it's right there on Reddit! Learn to take and give critique gracefully, separate your ego from the quality of your work and strive to always do something better than your previous best, or at least to not make the same mistakes you made last time. Watch the making-of DVD extras. Get a copy of The Animator's Survival Kit, it's one of the best books on animation currently available - mostly oriented to hand-drawn work, but you will learn a hell of a lot of things applicable to ANY form of animation from that book.

IIRC, Laika and Aardman are pretty much the only studios crazy enough to regularly do stop-motion features. If you can get in one of them as an intern then that would help a TON.

I can't give you any specific stop-motion references and tips; I'm an ex-animator but I was thoroughly a 2D kind of girl. Find stop motion communities and they can probably point you to the most awesomest references on the technical tricks unique to stop-motion.

u/whitedawg · 1 pointr/woahdude

Well, I believe that quantum physics indicates that the space in which we exist is in fact four-dimensional (including time), so the likelihood that we're in fact a dot on a higher-dimensional Mona Lisa is pretty small. Our universe may be 10-dimensional overall, but six of those dimensions split off from our four-dimensional space when energy density dropped shortly after the big bang and are currently curled up in an infinitesimal ball. One hypothesis is that, if you raise energy levels high enough, the 10 dimensions will unify again and the gravitational force will unify with the electromagnetic forces.

For a fantastic explanation of all this, check out Hyperspace by Michio Kaku - it's a book about quantum physics and crazy higher-dimensional stuff, written for people who don't know anything about physics, that reads like a novel.

u/coloco93 · 1 pointr/woahdude

You can buy it Here it's really long, but you can read some stories and leave others, personally, I think the whole book is worth it, one of my favorites of all time

u/jennaberry · 1 pointr/woahdude

There's a 1997 version on Amazon, but just searching around makes me think that this is a better choice as far as time lines go.

u/bobqjones · 2 pointsr/woahdude

This is the working theory of ethnobiologist Terrence Mckenna in his Food of the Gods book. good read. i would recommend it for all trees.

u/CanuckPanda · 65 pointsr/woahdude

It's a large part of many desert and steppe societies (basically those that live in harsh and unforgiving climates: Inuits, Samis, and other Arctic peoples can be included here) to provide some bare minimum of sustenance and safety to travellers.

In a world where everyone historically (and still do in some modern places) lived a nomadic or semi-nomadic life, it was a basic politeness to provide these things to any traveller, as you may at any day find yourself in a similar position to theirs and having to rely on the same goodwill and custom that you would provide. You can trace some of these customs in places like Afghanistan, Iran, and North Africa to the proliferation of travelling scholars, monks, or other learned men in the Roman Christian period and later in the dar-al-Islam and Caliphate periods.

You can see evidence in this is a number of modern travel journals for contemporary sources. I'd recommend On the Trail of Genghis Khan, about Australian Tim Cope's travels by horseback from Mongolia to Ukraine, or The Places in Between, which covers Rory Stewart's 2002 solo trek across Afghanistan, where he spends nights with Taliban commanders (among others) in the beginning periods of the NATO intervention by relying on a knowledge of these kinds of customs and traditions. They're not scholarly articles by any means, but they provide a modern view of how these customs and traditions still shape contemporary interactions in these places.

u/wamp_that_puck · 12 pointsr/woahdude

I believe he's referring to The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins.

u/Twobirdsstonedatonce · 9 pointsr/woahdude

The pictures at the end with weird inventions is all from a book I used to have as a kid called 101 unuseless inventions, http://www.amazon.com/Unuseless-Japanese-Inventions-Kenji-Kawakami/dp/0393313697, great book I remember always cracking up at the ridiculous inventions.

u/kekspernikai · 1 pointr/woahdude

I'd read this, to see just how many things we do every day are actually sins in the view of the bible. It's pretty ridiculous. And hilarious.

u/Are_You_Hermano · 72 pointsr/woahdude

I was going to mention this. Anyone interested in the Sundarbans should check out [The Hungry Tide] (https://www.amazon.com/Hungry-Tide-Novel-Amitav-Ghosh/dp/061871166X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1482944064&sr=1-1&keywords=hungry+tide) by Amitav Ghosh. Its a work of fiction that takes place in the Sundarbans and the location almost acts as a secondary character in the novel. It touches on the history of tiger attacks and other perils of living in the area. I found it to be a rather compelling read (along with some of his other works.)

u/mszegedy · 3 pointsr/woahdude

What do you mean? We already know what's down there, in detail. If you want a picture book, check out The Deep (compiled by Claire Nouvian), mostly a result of a single series of expeditions at and around 2006. Spoiler: mostly cephalopods, jellyfish, and siphonophores

u/vonmonologue · 8 pointsr/woahdude

all events for the past 5 years were written by markov bots based on history books, except someone slipped a copy of Our Dumb Century into the library.