Reddit reviews Convicting Avery: The Bizarre Laws and Broken System behind "Making a Murderer"

I do, but my bigger problem is with the procedures -- more so than the outcome itself. But I still think there was RD. If memory serves, I think even the jury was 7-5 on their initial vote for acquittal, and it took a long time (and some bullying) to win over the seven. I'm not trying to dodge you, but I'll have to summarize my position as this: too much prosecutor sophistry, too many cops and other government agents playing foot loose with protocol, and the lack of physical evidence where I would expect to see it. Not to push product, but my arguments (both from a procedural and substantive perspective) can be found here: https://www.amazon.com/Convicting-Avery-Bizarre-Broken-Murderer/dp/1633882551

> If memory serves, I think even the jury was 7-5 on their initial vote for acquittal, and it took a long time (and some bullying) to win over the seven.

Source for all of this? You were there?

I get it, you are a defense attorney. I've seen your comments which assume, in general, that prosecutors are unscrupulous and care only about convictions. Not an uncommon position to be taken by people who make their living opposing those people.

>Not to push product, but my arguments (both from a procedural and substantive perspective) can be found here: https://www.amazon.com/Convicting-Avery-Bizarre-Broken-Murderer/dp/1633882551

I'll read them if you say you will respond to any comments I might have. I'm here for discussion, not reading assignments. I could refer you to about one hundred posts of mine here. Would you read them?

https://www.amazon.com/Convicting-Avery-Bizarre-Broken-Murderer/dp/1633882551